moonlight is 1/50,000 the intensity of sunlight, so is not strong enough to enable plants to photosynthesise. At night, plants survive by using the oxygen left over from the daylight photosynthesis or takes the oxygen from the air surrounding it.
Perhaps this is not the full story, or even the correct one...Colleen...anyone.
- paul.fr - 10th Nov 07
Apparently we would need a universe with a Density of ten million times more stars to produce reflectivity from planets or stars to allow a bit of photosynthesis. Even this is only theoretical however.
- Sarah Elizabeth - 17th Dec 07
I used to work on Antarctic phytoplankton and many Antarctic aquatic plants do photosynthesize at very low light intensities. Often however the rate of carbon loss by respiration is greater than carbon fixed by photosynthesis. Paradoxically at very low temperatures they can show positive carbon fixation because respiration is depressed more by reducing temperature than photosynthesis.
- Terry Whitaker - 14th Dec 08
This is interesting when considering human sensitivity to moonlight and the sudden leap and subsequent drop in intensity of light reaching the earth (on clear nights!) a day either side of the fullmoon - about 30%. Apparently it's due to lunar dust acting like Scotchlite reflective tape in hi-viz vests. Those three days of 'lunar opposition effect' have been known (from only one source, I'm afraid. Hence this note!) to re-regulate irregular menstrual cycles in women. So, perhaps people 'photosynthesize' too in moonlight! Even if hormonal synthesis is simply triggered by this phenomenon.
- Fred - 27th Feb 10
it's difficult for me to believe that any plant that is receiving direct moonlight- wether waxing, waning, or full- doesn't feel it just because photosynthesis isn't happening.
- matty - 10th Dec 11
See the whole discussion |
Make a comment