Science News Archive

The Naked Scientists: Science Radio & Science Podcasts

News Story from our Archive
Get the feeling that you like someone...
27 Jun 2010
Science News RSS Feed

Copper-powered carbon sequestration

We’ve heard about carbon sequestration, deep beneath the Earth, but now here’s another way of dealing with the CO2 problem - with copper.

Part of the reason that CO2 is a problem is that it’s quite tricky to extract it from the air as it’s quite a stable molecule, at least compared with oxygen. And so most of the time gaseous oxygen will bond to a metal, for example, before carbon dioxide does.

But this new copper complex, reported in the journal Science this week, can ignore boring old O2 and go straight for CO2.

A team of researchers, led by Elisabeth Bouwman at the Leiden Institute of Chemistry, say that typically, the problem with oxygen is that it will gain an electron more readily than CO2. Copper coinsBut this copper complex will happily donate electrons to carbon dioxide instead.

So, to extract CO2 from the air, they put this copper complex into solution. Atmospheric CO2 to which it’s exposed is then absorbed. Next, to remove the captured carbon, they just added a lithium salt solution, apply a low voltage - 0.03V - across it, and the carbon precipitates as an organic compound.

As a bonus, this by-product can be converted into useful compounds which can be used in cleaning products and things like wood preservation.

But what’s really useful is that the copper complex can be cleaned at the end of the reaction and re-used. The researchers report that they managed to do this six times in seven hours.

Also, compared with other methods of sequestration, it’s actually quite cheap although there is a possibility that accessible copper ores might run dry not too far into the future!

17th Jan 2010

Discuss in Forum

An interesting article. Here's a bit more detail from the Nature website.
http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100114/full/news.2010.12.html

From what I've read this is really a way to reuse CO2, rather than to lock it away almost indefinitely (as with other sequestration methods).

I did wonder whether forming oxalate salts from the output of the process would allow further CO2 to be locked up permanently, but I have no idea how much extra energy this would require.


Another process for reusing unwanted CO2 (in this case from smoke stacks, etc) caught my attention a month ago:
http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/ucla-researchers-engineer-bacteria-149726.aspx


Looking forward to the webcast...
- peppercorn - 18th Jan 10
See the whole discussion | Make a comment




Naked Scientists Science Radio Show Home Who are The Naked Scientists Information about Naked Scientists
Naked Scientists Podcast Ask the Naked Scientists Podcast Question of the Week Podcast
Naked Science Articles Experiments to do at Home Science Discussion Forum
Science News Stories Answers to Science Questions Interviews with Famous Scientists

Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.

Click here for the Naked Scientists PODCAST

The contents of this site are © The Naked Scientists® 2000-2012. The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks.