Question of the Week

The Naked Scientists: Science Radio & Science Podcasts

Science Questions RSS Feed

How many objects can you instinctively count?

Say you had three eggs on the table, by simply looking at them you can tell that there are three eggs (without counting one, two, three etc...). My question is, how many eggs or any other objects does there have to be until you have to start counting them? Chemistry4me

We put this to Dr Roy Allen, School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen:

He’s talking about subitising and subitising is our apparent ability to instantly apprehend the quantity of a small group of objects without needing to consciously count each one individually. Unfortunately this is a research topic which has quite a heated debate about it. A Chinese AbacusA lot of people argue that subitising as such doesn’t exist at all and that really is some form of fast counting which is conscious. It’s very difficult to research into subitising simply because you have to eliminate conscious counting. The only way to do that is to present stimuli very quickly, very short periods of time. Something like 50ms and then ask people to give their impression of the quantity of objects that they actually see. This particular person’s question is quite difficult to answer because as long as the objects are present for a long length of time there’s always the possibility that they might also be counting as well as subitising. The answer to the question is probably 3 or 4 in the true sense of subitising. We probably do this by some form of pattern recognition. There’s some correlation between quantity and particular shape. For example, a triangle – three objects is always a triangle or almost invariably a triangle; two objects always form the ends of a straight line.

 

January 2009

- syhprum - 20th Jan 09
- DoctorBeaver - 20th Jan 09
- Chemistry4me - 20th Jan 09
- dentstudent - 21st Jan 09
- chris - 21st Jan 09
- BRValsler - 21st Jan 09
- dentstudent - 21st Jan 09
- dentstudent - 21st Jan 09
- raghavendra - 21st Jan 09
- Chemistry4me - 21st Jan 09
- DoctorBeaver - 23rd Jan 09
- RD - 24th Jan 09
- DoctorBeaver - 24th Jan 09
- RD - 24th Jan 09
- RD - 24th Jan 09
- DoctorBeaver - 24th Jan 09
- Chemistry4me - 25th Jan 09
- RD - 25th Jan 09
- Chemistry4me - 25th Jan 09
- Chemistry4me - 25th Jan 09
- RD - 25th Jan 09
- DoctorBeaver - 25th Jan 09
- amaterasu - 25th Jan 09
- RD - 26th Jan 09
- Chemistry4me - 27th Jan 09
- DoctorBeaver - 27th Jan 09
- Chemistry4me - 27th Jan 09
- SETF - 3rd Feb 09
- Chemistry4me - 4th Feb 09
- erickejah - 13th Feb 09
- Chemistry4me - 13th Feb 09
- wannabe - 27th Feb 09
- Chemistry4me - 27th Feb 09
- erickejah - 8th Mar 09
- yor_on - 17th Mar 09
- Chemistry4me - 17th Mar 09
- yor_on - 17th Mar 09
- Farah jarjous - 24th Mar 09
- gurpal - 22nd Jul 09
See the whole discussion | Make a comment



Naked Scientists Science Radio Show Home Who are The Naked Scientists Information about Naked Scientists
Naked Scientists Podcast Ask the Naked Scientists Podcast Question of the Week Podcast
Naked Science Articles Experiments to do at Home Science Discussion Forum
Science News Stories Answers to Science Questions Interviews with Famous Scientists

Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.

Click here for the Naked Scientists PODCAST

The contents of this site are © The Naked Scientists® 2000-2012. The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks.