robert riley asked the Naked Scientists:
Hi Chris
I run on my local sports track a few times a week -- I have been for years trying to beat my personal best of 2.40 but to no avail -- yet last month on a whim I decided to run it barefoot and run 2.34 smashing my pb --
I tried it again a few times and run in low 2.30s again. As an experiment I ran my next few times in trainers again and run low 2.40s as I used too do.
My question is, if running barefoot is so much faster for me, why do athletes bother with trainers in the first place?
thanks, great show
Rob
What do you think?
- robert riley - 10th Jul 08
Some tracks are not made of grass - suggest you avoid these.
- blakestyger - 10th Jul 08
Are you talking about your 800 time? I my pr is 2:11 and I was just a freshman :) haha anyways.
I myself, never tired running out of shoes on a track and timed myself. It all does depend on the surface. On our rubber track I could probably run without them, but I don't think it will improve or decrease my pr.
- Simulated - 10th Jul 08
Are you using distance shoes or sprint shoes? One implication from getting better times barefoot is that you're using distance shoes and might be better off using sprint shoes.
- LeeE - 27th Jul 08
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zola_Budd
- RD - 27th Jul 08
It's bad for the joints, and you can increase your chances of injury.
- TonyCap - 27th Jul 08
See the whole discussion |
Make a comment