Science Interviews


Mon, 3rd Nov 2014

Where did werewolves come from?

Deborah Hyde

Listen Now    Download as mp3 from the show Supernatural Science

Debra Hyde is the editor of Skeptic Magazine, and an expert in the history of folklaw. She is particularly interested in 'supernatural predators', like vampires and werewolves, which crop up in stories from a variety of cultures, as she outlined to Chris Wolf HowlingSmith...

Debra -  Scepticism includes a lot of areas.  It can include cryptozoology for example Ė people who believe theyíve seen something like the beast of Bodmin Moor or Big Foot. Perhaps people who feel that theyíve been abducted by aliens or even fairies as wouldíve been more fashionable a hundred years ago.  Weíre interested in an evidence base for things.  Weíre interested rather than in our perceptions which I think weíve seen this evening can be so frequently faulty.  Weíre interested in the evidence to see what's real and what isnít.

Chris -  What about these consistent stories of Beasts of Bodmin and vampires and all that kind of thing?  Where do they come from?

Debra -  Vampires were probably a misunderstanding of normal processes of decomposition.  They just happened at a specific time in history.  It was a couple of centuries ago really and the reason that the stories came out when they did was political.

Chris -  What is a misunderstanding of the process of decomposition?

Debra -  Our ancestors, for very, very good reason didnít understand decomposition the way we do.  We can study these things scientifically and safely, but years ago, you wouldnít keep corpses around for the very good reason that they were a hygiene problem.  So, for example, when a body goes into rigor mortis, as is perfectly normal, leaving it out for a little while, you would realise that actually, the flexibility comes back.  So, if people saw a body that had regained its flexibility, they might think that it was actually still quite life-like, that it hadnít passed over to the other side.  What if it had failed to decay?  What if you didnít have bones in a coffin anymore?  What if you actually had flesh?  And if youíve got somebody buried in winter for example, the ground is very hard and itís very cold.  You can in effect, put people in a freezer for 6 months.  Itís not necessarily that unusual that they wouldnít be a skeleton yet.  But it would be quite unusual and quite scary for people who didnít understand this, that there were other variables at work.

Chris -  But where did this whole idea of this fetish for sinking your teeth into someoneís neck come from?

Debra -  That was much later and we understand it, we understand that if a creature has its blood taken out, that it dies.  It was thought that there was a life force attached to it.  Literally, the blood being taken out is a bit more of a literary trope that comes later with all of the romantic literature.

Chris -  What about werewolves?  I've seen the Were-rabbit Ė Wallace and Gromit.  Thatís really good but what about the werewolf?

Debra -  Well, thatís a really interesting thing that you should mention a were-rabbit because when I do a slideshow, I show a list of all of the animals that can potentially turn into were-animals in folklore, commonly throughout the world.  I have creatures like hyenas and tigers, and cats and jackals.  Is there anything that you can think that actually unites those types of creatures?  What's a similar theme?

Freddie -  Freddie from Little Downham.  They're all four-legged and they're all sort of, in the same, sort of , cat family, with maybe few exceptions.

Debra -  There are cats.  They're definitely a lot of cats.  Are there any other similarities between those kinds of things, the habits of those creatures, the kinds of things they do?

Charlie -  Charlie.  I'm from Caldecott.  They all have big teeth, sharp teeth.

Debra -  They do.  They have big teeth and big teeth are for hunting.  Thatís the thing about all of these creatures is they're apex predators.  They're incredibly powerful. And it seems that if people want in their minds to think of somebody turning into an animal that nobody would take that great power and turn into a were-hamster.

Chris -  What is the sort of modern day equivalent because obviously, those things came along because obviously, those things came along because people were troubled by not actually understanding the basis of the science that was going on?  Have people now reinvented new threats and new sorts of equivalents based on their more modern understanding of the world around them?  Has the interpretation moved on?

Debra -  I think it would be a mistake to assume that just because we live in a technologically based society that people still donít have these kinds of beliefs.  There are very prevalent New Age beliefs, people who believe in angels and things like that.  The thing thatís interesting to notice, if you go into history, that so many of these creatures are very dangerous and they're quite random.  And so was life.  An awful lot of people died prematurely in historical times.  Itís very easy for us to forget the effect that antibiotics and vaccinations, and safe midwifery processes have had, that itís had on human death rates.  In medieval times, there was about a 1 in 10 chance that you would die giving birth.  Itís very, very unusual now.  These days, if you talk to people about supernatural creatures, they're quite often likely to believe in lovely things that help them out because our lives are benign and safer.

Chris -  Any questions?  GeorgiaÖ

Georgia -  Do you think these beliefs are good for people to have or do you think they're more damaging?

Debra -  It varies.  Itís very noticeable in history that when there are random environmental factors, when there are wars, when there are epidemics, when there is mad inflation or something like that, that people get very panicky and they're likely to scapegoat other people.  It seems to be tremendously satisfying for groups of people to look to blame one person and then to perform a ritual to get rid of that person or to get rid of that effect thatís happening.  Now, it doesnít actually work, but it makes people feel better temporarily.  You can see that with witch hunts and things like that.  So, sometimes itís not particularly nice, but it makes people feel temporarily better even though they can be wrong and they can do very terrible things.  In some ways, I think that belief in the supernatural has been very useful for hygiene type purposes Ė keeping corpses separate from people.  We donít bury the dead under the house.  With a few exceptions, we bury them in graveyards and things like that.  So, the sense of contagion that we have which can feed into supernatural constructs is also actually very good at avoiding disease.

Chris -  Ginny and HannahÖ

Hannah -  Can we have a final volunteer to help us make some ectoplasm?

Callum -  I'm Callum from Streatham.

Hannah -  Wonderful!  Thank you very much for joining us on the stage, Callum.  Ginny, youíve got here a lovely perspex bowl which is nice and clean for the moment and youíve also got some PVA glue, so the kind of glue that you get in your school art class.

Ginny -  Okay, so Callum, what I need you to do is just put a little blob of that in the bottom of the bowl.  So, this is just standard PVA glue.  Just tip some into there.  Yeah, that will do.  Stop there.

Hannah -  So, thatís probably about half a tablespoon, would you say, Callum?

Callum -  I would say that.

Ginny -  Good.  Now, just because itís a bit more fun, weíve got some green food colouring.  Do you want to tip just a little drop in there and give it a stir around?

Hannah -  Callum, what's it looking like now?

Callum -  Itís looking like snot.

Ginny -  Itís a nice bright green colour isnít it?  I'm just going to add a little dash of water. And can you stir that in for me?  Have a feel of the kind of texture of it.  What does it feel like?

Callum -  Itís quite runny, but still quite thin.

Ginny -  Yeah, sort of gluey but quite runny glue because weíve stirred in a load of water.

Hannah -  Itís kind of dripping off your fingers there wasnít it Callum?

Callum -  Yeah.

Ginny -  So now, what I have here is spray starch.  Have you ever seen this before?

Callum -  No.

Ginny -  Do I take it you donít do a lot of ironing at home?

Callum -  That is correct.

Ginny -  Those of you who do do ironing may have seen this before. You spray it on your shirts and then you iron them and then it makes it nice and crisp, and fresh.  So, itís just the sort of stuff you might find in laundry cupboard at home.  I'm going to spray some in the bowl and I need you to stir it in for me.

Hannah -  So, what's happening as weíre stirring in the starch?

Callum -  Itís starting to thicken the liquid.

Ginny -  I'm going to put a bit more in, give that a good stirÖ

Callum -  Itís starting to thicken even more.

Ginny -  Can we see itís almost going kind of stringy as I pick it up?  Letís put some more in,  keep going.

Hannah -  Wow!  Thatís transforming before our very eyes.  Callum, whatís happening there?

Callum -  Itís starting to combine together and become stronger and harder.

Ginny -  So now itís started sort of pulling away from the side of the bowl, hasnít it?  Weíve got a big oozy lump.  Do you want to get your hands in there now?

Callum -  Yes.

Hannah -  Itís now coating Callumís hands and just stringing down.  Callum, how does that feel?

Callum -  Quite cold!  Quite soapy.

Ginny -  Sort of slimy, isnít it?  But look, if you pick it up really, really quickly and sort of roll it around between your hands, you can actually almost get it to form a sort of ball and then as soon as I let go, it goes back to being liquid.  Can you see that?  Okay, letís try adding a bit more.

Callum -  Itís kind of jelly-like.

Ginny -  So, the more starch weíve added, the more solid itís become and itís gone from being entirely liquid to being this kind of stringy gloop that you can actually sort of roll around in your hands.  Itís almost like flubber.  If we kept spraying the starch in, it would get firmer and firmer, and firmer as you go.  If you try this at home, you can experiment with adding different amounts of starch to make a firmer or a wetter slime.

Hannah -  Callum, can you come up with some idea for why you think this might be happening?  Why do you think adding starch to glue might make it more solid and slimy-like?

Callum -  Is it something to do with the chemical reaction that is taking place?

Hannah -  Ginny!

Ginny -  Very good answer!  What you have is PVA glue.  Itís a long chain molecule.  So, if you imagine every row in this room, if you held hands with the people next to you then each of you would be a polymer, long chain molecule like PVA.  What's happening when weíre adding starch is that itís joining those molecules up.  So, then if you imagine, you're still holding hands with the people next to you, but if a few of you reach back and grab the hand of the person behind you so that all the lines are joined up Ė now originally, when you were just holding the hands of people next to you, if Iíd ask you to move, you could quite easily have moved Ė one row couldíve gone left and the next row couldíve gone right.  Thatís why the PVA can move around.  The molecules can slide over each other.  When we add the starch and it causes those molecules to join up like when you joined hands with the person in front or behind you, the molecules can't slide over each other as easily.  They're what we call cross-linked and that makes this harder, stretchier material.  Now, they can still slide a bit because they haven't cross-linked all that much.  But the more starch we add, the harder itíll get for them to move around because the more of you would be holding hands with the people in front of you.  That makes a harder, firmer, mixture.  Thatís actually the same thing they do to rubber.  To make the rubber for your tires and things, they add sulphur and that crosslinks the rubber molecules, making it firmer so you get nice hard bouncy tires.  You wouldnít want tires that were made out of something like this slime.


Subscribe Free

Related Content


Make a comment

The Mountain Gorilla existed in legend for years before it was actually "discovered". 

I doubt we have a Sasquatch or Big Foot living among us.  However, there was a time in the not too distant past when Europeans co-existed with Neanderthals.  They likely were the topic of stories as the numbers slowly dwindled to none.  How long would these stories endure?  Could the stories spread from continent to continent? 

Of course we have both grizzly bears and black bears in America.  The grizzlies would be easy to anthropomorphize.  And, likely there have been humans that are best described as "wild men".  And, of course, religion has been frequently tied to animals.

Stories get embellished over time.  Ever play a game where everyone gets in a circle and successively repeats the story around the circle until a very different story makes it around the the beginning?  Nonetheless, people like to use superlatives in their stories, the biggest, worst, meanest, smartest, most cunning, etc. 

It is not surprising to see human and animal characteristics merged in stories. CliffordK, Tue, 4th Nov 2014

See the whole discussion | Make a comment

Not working please enable javascript
Powered by UKfast
Genetics Society