Dr Peter McGrail, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Chris - Now we heard about old coal mine being used as a place to dump our old CO2 but how about old volcanoes? Our next guest on is Peter McGrail and heís from the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in Washington State and heís been looking at the carbon catching properties of flood basalt. Thatís a type of rock thatís left over from when lava flowed out of volcanoes. Hello Peter...
Peter - Good evening.
Chris - Thank you for joining us so whatís the basis to this technique? How does it work?
Peter - Basically we would be looking at capturing CO2 from a stationary source like a coal-fired power plant and then injecting that CO2 deep underground (2000ft-3miles). That CO2 would then enter into a special structure in the continental flood basalt. You have to think of these things the way they were produced. There were these massive cracks that were in the Earthís structure and these massive lava flows extruded out of those massive cracks and extended out over many hundreds of miles. These individual folds would have been separated by hundreds of thousands or millions of years. What happens is that contacts between these individual flows there were cracks, crevices and bubbles that are present. This is where the porosity and permeability exists in these continental flood basalts for injections and movement of fluids including CO2.
Chris - So what would you do? Would you put the CO2 down as a gas or would you dissolve it into the water first and then pump the water through those holes in the lava?
Peter - It would go down the injection wells as a liquid. That liquid CO2 would then enter into the formation displacing the water that was present in the pore space and fracture spaces in those interflow zones. Eventually the water would then absorb the CO2. The thing that we found is quite intriguing about these flood basalts is that once the CO2 dissolves in the water we have a very rapid reaction that occurs between the CO2 saturated water and the basalt. CO2 gets converted back into a solid rock: calcium carbonate is the end product.
Chris - Quite literally itís turning the CO2 into stone.
Peter - Absolutely. With no additional energy input required of then getting the CO2 into the basalt formation.
Chris - Hereís the killer question: does it work?
Peter - Thatís a question that weíre attempting to answer through some pilot studies that weíre just about ready to start. We plan to drill our first pilot well here in Eastern Washington State in March or early April this year. Then about the summer of 2008 we would be injecting 3000 tonnes of CO2 into this Columbia River basalt route, here in Washington State.
Chris - That sounds like a lot, 3000 tonnes but putting that in perspective that must be the output from a big, coal fired station over the course of a couple of hours?
Peter - Depending on size, yes that would be a few hours to maybe one shift in terms of CO2 production.
Chris - How are you going to trace where the CO2 goes once itís in the ground?
Peter - A variety of ways: monitoring techniques that we use. There are techniques that we extract fluid samples from depth and so looking at the change in water chemistry around the injection well. We also use what we call geophysical techniques so these are seismic techniques that allow us to look at an image of the CO2 in the subsurface.
Chris - Are there any possible negative effects to doing this?
Peter - One of the things that has to happen in any geological sequestration project is the containment of CO2 and so in these deep flood basalts one of the research areas that we want to investigate is whether the CO2 is staying in the place that we think it will. That is we donít want to have cracks, crevices and fractures that would allow that CO2 to migrate a significant distance vertically. Computer simulations donít suggest thatís possible but of course theyíre just computer simulations. The fieldwork is critical to proving what weíre seeing in our computer models.
Chris - Finally, how much CO2 do you think the world realistically could lock away in this way, assuming youíre successful?
Peter - Well, one of the things weíve done is taken advantage of geological data. The department of energy in Washington State has spent almost a 1/2 billion dollars characterising the Columbia River basalts here. That information database has been extremely valuable to allow us to continue to compute these numbers. What we see is that conservative estimates would be about 20 gigatons to 50 gigatons of CO2 capacity in just the Columbia basalt rift which, in perspective what that means is about 10-20 years of all the CO2 emissions from all the coal fired power plants in the United States. The capacity is actually quite significant.
Chris - Well, we wish you luck and I guess weíll be talking to you in a year or so to see if it worked.
Peter - Iíll be happy to join you again!