Podcast Transcript

The Naked Scientists: Science Radio & Science Podcasts

Superhero 3D X-ray vision

Med diet prevents major disease

Back in July, Greek researchers working as part of EPIC,Olive Oil the largest study of diet and cancer ever undertaken, showed that the more Mediterranean a person’s diet is, the lower the risk of cancer. That’s a diet that contains lots of fruit, veg, grains, nuts and fish, along with a splash of olive oil, but is low in red and processed meat, alcohol, dairy and animal fats.

Now an analysis of 12 international studies of diet and disease published in the British Medical Journal has shown that a strict Mediterranean diet can help to reduce deaths from other diseases as well as cancer, including heart disease, Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s.

Collectively, the studies covered more than 1.5 million people, whose diet and health were tracked from three to 18 years. All the studies used a score, to work out how “Mediterranean” a person’s diet was.  The researchers found that people sticking strictly to a Mediterranean diet had a 9% drop in overall death rate, including a 9% cut in deaths from heart disease, a 13% drop in the incidence of Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s, and a 6% cut in cancer incidence.

The researchers suggest that a tool to help people to “score” their diets might be an effective way to help people cut the risk of these diseases and live longer. 

14th Sep 2008


Tackling post-natal depression in poorer countries

Researchers from Liverpool working in rural Rawalpindi in Pakistan have found a simple and effective way to cut depression in mothers in poorer countries.

BabyReporting their results in a special edition of the journal The Lancet this week, the researchers trained local village-based health workers in delivering the “Thinking Healthy Programme” to mothers in the final third of their pregnancy. The programme is based on cognitive behavioural therapy and involves listening techniques, guided questioning, and enabling mothers to practice techniques between sessions.  The researchers then measured the levels of depression in the mothers on the programme at 6 and 12 months, as well as monitoring the babies’ heights and weights.

In the trial, 463 mothers from 20 villages were given the programme, while 440 from another 20 villages acted as a control.  The team found that mothers in the control group were more than four times likely to be depressed than those given the programme. They also found that babies of mothers on the programme were less likely to have had diarrhoea, and were more likely to have had all their immunisations. They also found that mothers and fathers in the group on the programme played with their babies more often, and were also more likely to use contraceptives.

14th Sep 2008


Robotic Carrier Pigeons

As rural areas especially in developing countries are very spread out and often have an awful transport infrastructure clinics can be many hours if not days away from the nearest hospital with a lab able to do tests.  This means that any treatment that depends on the results could be delayed by days, which is obviously not good for the patient.

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Barry Mendelow of the South African National Health Laboratory Service has a solution to this problem – spy planes...  Not the big ones costing millions of pounds, but the small Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) that have been developed for soldiers to be able to see over the next hill.  These are like radio controlled planes with a computer and GPS system so that they are essentially autonomous and able to fly a preprogrammed course of over 50km at 45km/hr and report back on their progress by mobile phone.

The first UAV they developed had a payload of 500g and is able to carry up to 20 blood or saliva samples or 2 units of blood or even life saving drugs such as rabies vaccines.  It can be given coordinates to drop off the samples and then instructed to fly back to base.  It is then landed manually by remote control.

While they developed this UAV, technology for doing tests has moved on and molecular diagnostics techniques have been developed that only need a spot of blood or sputum on a piece of paper.  This has lead the team to develop a much smaller and cheaper UAV with an only 10g payload which is small but still enough to carry 10-20 paper spot samples.  It only weighs 800g but can be launched and retrieved by hand and has a range of over 50km.

In tests they have sent a sample by UAV to a lab and got the results back to the clinic by SMS within 6 hours.

14th Sep 2008


Molecular help for heart attacks

Researchers in the US have discovered a chemical that could become a new treatment for heart attacks, as well as helping to protect the heart during open heart surgery or other traumatic events.

A HeartWriting in the journal Science, the researchers from Stanford and Indiana universities describe how jump-starting a particular enzyme called ALDH-2 using a compound called Alda-1 can reduce the amount of cell death caused by a lack of blood flow to the heart  - as is seen during heart attacks.

The key to the research was the team’s discovery that ALDH2 activity correlates with reduced levels of cell damage in heart attacks. ALDH2 is better known as an alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme, responsible for breaking down alcohol in the body – and it’s well known that small amounts of alcohol can help to protect the heart. So the scientists set about finding a molecule that could switch on ALDH2 without the need for booze, and that turned out to be Alda-1.

At the moment, the experiments have only been done in rats, so several more years of work will be needed, to turn the chemical Alda-1 into a drug that’s safe and effective in humans.

Millions of people of East Asian origin aren’t suitable for the most common heart treatments, such as nitroglycerin, due to their genetic makeup – around 40% of people from that background have a faulty version of ALDH2. But the team found that Alda-1 was particularly effective at kick-starting this form of ALDH2, which offers hope for a treatment for this group of people.

14th Sep 2008


Are glow-in-the-dark watches a radiation hazard?

I was just wondering, is there any radiation that would come from a glow-in-the-dark watch that would be harmful to the wearer? Sandra, Melbourne

Philip Clark, University of Edinburgh, Experimental Particle Physics Group:

It depends very much on the type of dial that you’re considering.  By far the most common watch that you come across that’s glow in the dark is called a phosphorescent watch.  Essentially the watch is coated in a paint which absorbs light and then re-emits it.  These watches are completely harmless. 

Rolex submarinerThe second type of watch is called a tritium watch.  The modern way to do this is you have the same phosphorescent paint but this time it’s mixed with small tubes filled with tritium.  Tritium is radioactive and emits beta particles.  These have the same effect of exciting the phosphorescent paint.  This time tritium has got a half-life of 12 years.  The beta particles that are emitted are not very energetic so if anything they couldn’t even penetrate the outermost skin layer. 

The third watch I’d like to mention is a radium watch.  They have very much the same design but this time instead of tritium they’re mixed with radium.  The half-life is sixteen hundred years.  However, they may not seem to be as radioactive because the phosphor in the paint gets eaten up by the radium.  I’ve got a small demonstration here so I’ve got an old watch that I’m going to hold a Geiger counter to.  If I turn the Geiger counter on you’ll hear it clicking:

<click>

That’s when I hold it slightly close to the watch.  If I hold it really close to the watch:

<much more rapid series of clicks>

And the take it away from the watch then the background count – you can hear the occasional count just now is much lower than if you hold it closer to the watch.  These watches are extremely radioactive.  However they’re still not too harmful unless you were to break the watch and inhale it or somehow ingest the watch.

 

September 2008

I assume the question relates to those watches that have hands which absorb and re-emit light, rather than the electro luminescent kind. Early examples of these used radioactive materials, I believe it was radium, which was harmful. However, there is no harm from the materials used in watches today.
- rhade - 12th Sep 08


I haven't heard the podcast yet, but if it's an old watch more than 40 years old then it might contain a radioactive isotope. A radioactive glow-in-the-dark would continue glowing even if left in the dark for many hours.

Modern non-radioactive glow-in-the-dark materials are "charged up" by visible and ultraviolet light, but their glow becomes weaker over many minutes so that once they've been in the dark for half an hour barely glow at all.
- techmind - 15th Sep 08
That's good information from thedoc.

I know that anecdotes may have limited value in assessing risk, but this experience sticks out in my mind. An older man was showing me his older watch, and we got to talking about how it glowed in the dark, and then he removed the watch and showed be a lump on his wrist directly under the watch. He seemed to think the radiation from the watch might have caused the lump which I'm guessing was sort of a benign cyst which he had for some time, I don't think he even told his doctor about it. Nor did he seem to feel the watch threatened him (at least, not his life), because in spite of his suspicion about the lump, he continued to wear the watch.

I'm pretty sure the watch was the radium type thedoc mentioned. Ever since I saw that guys lump in his wrist, I've never wanted to wear a watch with radium in it I don't know how rational that is based on one anecdote, but knowing what I do about radiation, it certainly seems plausible to me that the lump might have resulted from radiation from the watch.
- Arbitrageur - 20th Jun 11
As a boy 75 years ago I scraped some of the Radium paint from an watch dial and I have often wondered if I ingested any, if I did it has not as yet had any life shortening effect.
- syhprum - 21st Jun 11
I wear a watch with tritium tubes - and after 40 years it is still bright enough to read in the pitch dark (although maybe the previous owner had them replaced). 

The watch picture above has luminescent paint - either Luminova or Super-Luminova;  in the early 60s Rolex changed from Radium to Tritium, but dials with Tritium are marked with a T either side of the SWISS / SWISS MADE underneath the 6.
- imatfaal - 21st Jun 11
See the whole discussion | Make a comment

The Super Solar Power Tower

Christina Scott, Science and Development Network

Meera -   Providing the cities and villages of Africa with a good supply of electricity has long been a challenge for African governments.  With many of the smaller countries relying on larger ones to connect them to the grid.  But a recent proposal approved by the government in Namibia could provide vast amounts of power from a natural, renewable source.  With me this week is Christina Scott from the Science and Development Network to tell me more.

Schematic presentation of a solar updraft tower.Christina -   There's a proposal to build an absolutely massive solar energy tower outside the capital of Namibia which is Windhoek.  Historically they've always got their electricity from their neighbours, only South Africa basically ran out of electricity and it's having this terrible knock on effect on all the knock on countries.  The good side is that now there's a renewed interest in renewable energy and there's this proposal to build an absolutely massive solar tower, and it's going to be one of the first ones in the world, it's one and an half kilometres high!  I have trouble actually imagining how they're going to persuade planes to go around it, it's going to be so big!

Meera -   That's extremely high, actually, and how wide is it going to be?

Christina -   Well basically it's one very boring looking chimney, straight up, straight down.  But at the base of it there's going to be a transparent disk stretching for about half a kilometre into the distance around, a bit like a doughnut.  The idea is that this will trap the solar energy and it will get funnelled into the tower into wind turbines.  At the same time, there's research that's been done here in South Africa at the University of Stellenbosch which says that you can use that transparent disk to actually at the same time create really big greenhouses and do two things at the same time.

What worries me is that there are no prototypes.  We had one tower which was a lot smaller in Spain, which was used as a test run, but between then and now there's been almost nothing else.  What's happening with this proposal is that they're arguing that because these things work so much better the bigger they are, they want to go past the intermediary steps and build what will basically be the world's biggest man made structure.  So it will be incredibly expensive to build, on the other hand it will be very, very inexpensive to run and they're particularly good for areas that don't have a lot of water because some solar power designs require water as a back-up, and quite frankly places like Namibia just don't have the water to be able to cope.

Meera -   But at the same time, you've mentioned that it's going to be very expensive to build this tower, so how much money are we looking at here?

Christina -   Well, the pre-feasibility report on it's own is $780,000 and there are other countries that are looking at it as well, so presumably the cost will come down if we get quite a lot of solar chimneys being built in countries like Australia, Egypt, India, Morocco.  But right now, they're proposing something that's going to be $900 million to construct.

Meera -   That's a lot of money, so is it actually worth that amount to go this way?

Christina -   I think the Namibian government is interested because they are situated really well for using solar power, and they are extremely vulnerable to what happens in their neighbouring countries.  We've got electricity here in South Africa but we're using it all ourselves.  They want to become more independent.  This is just one of the things that they're looking at, for example Namibia has uranium and rather than exporting it they're now considering nuclear power as well because their economy wont expand without power, it is an issue across the continent.

Meera -   Where are we, currently, with this situation?  Is it going to be built soon or is it just in discussions?  What's the current position?

Christina -   Right now they're still in discussions.  We interviewed the permanent secretary for the ministry of mines and energy in Namibia and he says that they are basically prepared to work with serious investors.  They're interested in this one because the solar tower, the tower of power, can actually work at night, which they're quite interested in.

Meera -   It is going to provide 24 hour power then?

Christina -   It can provide 24 hour power and it can provide power at peak times, which is something that doesn't always happen with other versions of solar power.  They had a study for a similar solar chimney in the Kalahari desert on the South African side of the border, and that was dropped.  That was dropped because they considered that it's power was too expensive compared with the coal power that South Africa relies on quite heavily.  But given the fact that we've got global warming, it makes a lot of sense for countries that have a lot of sun to wean themselves off oil.  I think we're going to find a lot more work going into these solar towers in the future.Quivertree forest in Namibia

September 2008



Naked Scientists Science Radio Show Home Who are The Naked Scientists Information about Naked Scientists
Naked Scientists Podcast Ask the Naked Scientists Podcast Question of the Week Podcast
Naked Science Articles Experiments to do at Home Science Discussion Forum
Science News Stories Answers to Science Questions Interviews with Famous Scientists

Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large.

Click here for the Naked Scientists PODCAST

The contents of this site are © The Naked Scientists® 2000-2012. The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks.