|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Thirst for KnowledgeImagine you've been told you've won a prize. But you don't know how much. It could be pennies or it could be millions. Most of us would be itching to find out about the size of the prize. Now researchers in the States have discovered that uncovering information about future rewards is actually rewarding in itself, and uses the same pathways in the brain as our response to very basic rewards such as food or drink. 19th Jul 2009 Jockeys Stance Shaves SecondsDr Andrew Spence, Royal Veterinary CollegeChris - And also this week, there’s a paper in the Journal Science that explains how jockeys have been able to shave up to 7% off their race times in the last 100 years and it turns out that it’s all down to the way that jockeys sit in the saddle. They don’t sit like that in that uncomfortable looking posture just for fun. There is some method to their madness and Dr. Andrew Spence form the Royal Veterinary College is here to tell us why. Hello, Andrew?
Chris - Welcome to the Naked Scientists. So, what did you do? Andrew - Well, so it started with the sort of a group discussion about this paper in humans where people had found that when you put a backpack on humans, it’s allowed to slide up and down, they use less energy and… Chris - So you mean bounce up and down? I think that was a Nature paper few years ago, wasn’t it? When the rucksack, when a person’s taking a step, the rucksack bounces up and down on an elastic band and they use less energy under those circumstances. Andrew - You got it. Yes, it’s a nice paper by Professor Larry Rome at UPenn. Basically, we thought, maybe the crouch posture allows the jockey to do the same thing and physically, what happens is that the jockey’s legs act like shock absorbers and it turns out that if you’re a horse, it’s much easier to just keep the jockey off the ground, but not have to jiggle them up and down with each step that you take. Chris - I get it. So, if the jockey is sat both upright in the saddle like a guardsman at Buckingham Palace, changing the guard then the horse with every step would have to lift the jockey up and down, whereas if the jockey stands up in that strange and bizarre posture, the “Martini Glass” posture… Andrew - Yes. Chris - Then the horse isn’t physically lifting the jockey up because the jockey is basically countering the movement of the horse by bending his legs up and down? Andrew - You got it. That’s exactly right and it’s hard for a human to imagine what that feels like, but I think, the closest we could get is probably to these Nepalese porters who carried big jugs of waters on these bamboo poles that can flex up and down, you know? It’s easier to carry something if you don’t have to accelerate it up and down each time. Chris - How did you actually do the work? Andrew - Well, so that was interesting. There’s this whole new class of sensors coming out and basically, they're the kind of thing that’s in your Nintendo Wii controller. So, it’s the same chip that’s in the little controller that it allows you to play Wii tennis. It’s a little chip that can measure when it’s being accelerated. And so, we put those in the saddle and on the jockey and we took measurements and we compared them and we saw that yup, presto! The horse moves up down a lot; and the jockey moves up and down a lot less. Chris - Can you take that learning and make differences or changes to jockey’s technique to train them so they’ll make their horses to go even faster? Andrew - Well absolutely, I mean that’s, so – we don’t even know. I mean, this is the tip of the iceberg really. So what would be really, really cool to do right is to get Frankie out there, get Frankie Dettori out there and then put some gadgets on him and then make some measurements on novices. You know, some of these are collaborators of the British Racing School take these. You know, they’re really interested. They’re young kids. They’re 14, 15-year-old boys and girls who want to be jockeys and we, you know go out there and measure them, and you could compare and see how close Frankie is to perfect and who knows? You know, we could really use it as a training tool. Chris - Sounds terrific. Thank you very much, Andrew. That was Andrew Spence who’s from the Royal Veterinary College, explaining how jockeys actually move their bodies effectively, doing some of the work for the horse. That means the horse has got more energy to put in, to running fast and in fact, since 1900 when they started to adopt that posture. They’re going about 7% faster. July 2009 A Message from our Cat OverlordsIt's a well-known fact that humans don't own their cats – rather the cats own us. This is why I, Dr Kat, am a dog person. And now a report in this week's Current Biology reveals how our feline overlords manage to persuade foolish humans to do their bidding.
Most animals, including humans, have an innate sensitivity to needy cries – which is why we respond to crying babies or mewling puppies or kittens. If an adult cat just meows, we tend to get annoyed, but by hiding a high-pitched cry inside a low-pitched purr, it helps to send the signal that they're hungry and need feeing, without the human owner realising they're being manipulated.
19th Jul 2009 The Future of Scientific JournalsEmilie Marcus, Editor-in-Chief, CellChris - The way that scientific discoveries get presented and published is about to undergo a big change: this week, in fact. For hundreds of years scientists have been writing up their findings and then publishing them in journals. These were effectively big science magazines and when the internet came along, many journals began to publish the material online that they were also putting into the printed edition. The problem is that the online environment isn’t necessarily the same as the printed environment. So now Emilie Marcus, the Editor-in-Chief of Cell, one of the world’s biggest science journals, is this week going to launch what they’ve dubbed ‘the article of the future.’ It’s effectively a whole new way of presenting information and she’s with us now. Hello, Emilie.
Chris - Welcome to the Naked Scientists. Why do we need to change what we’re doing at the moment? What’s wrong with just putting up a facsimile edition of your printed papers on the web for scientists and doctors to download? Emilie - Well, I guess, there’s not necessarily something wrong with it. I think the current format, as you said, was developed for a print environment and is very effective for that at communicating information. But the bottom line is now we do have all the functionalities that an online environment can add to what one can do in print and really enhance the usability of the article. It’s kind of like going to a movie these days and all the previews are in colour and with sound and full surround and then you get to the movie and it still a silent [black and white film]. I mean, there’s nothing wrong with the silent black and white films but you can really use the new technologies that you have to improve the article, structure and form of online environments. Chris - Indeed. I mean, when I’m trying to read papers that I’m going to talk about here on the Naked Scientists, the scroll wheel on my mouse does get a lot of use going up and down in the papers. What are you going to do to make your papers much more engaging and user-friendly on the internet then? Emilie - Yes, so the two main points that we’re trying to address with this first release of the article and feature prototypes are - one; helping users more quickly identify which papers they want to read. So, for that, we’ve added in the front more forms of summary of the papers. So, in addition to the traditional text abstract that’s there, there is now also a graphical pictorial summary of what’s in the paper and there are audio-visual interviews with the author that summarizes what’s in the papers. So, depending on what you’re preferred mechanism of figuring out which papers you want to read is you now have more options in going to the paper… Chris - So the days of having to actually buy a second computer monitor, so you can display them more without going keep flicking backwards and forwards. You’re saying those were over? Emilie - Yes. Chris - But talk us through the interface a little bit more because I know you started but- so, as I’m reading through the paper and I see, say, a little bit of information that I think very interesting. I’d like to drill down a little bit more about say, a particular reference. Can you do that? Emilie - Yes, so all of the information now hyperlinks to the references and likewise, you can start from a the reference then go back to figure out where in the paper that reference is discussed. So the entire text is much more interconnected in the entire layouts is more interconnected and there is also a way to navigate through it based on, basically, a picture. So, you can look at a picture, an illustration and say, “Okay, this is a part of the paper I’m interested in,” and click on it and it will take you directly to that part of the paper. So you no longer have to sort of start at the beginning as you did in the print environment and read from the beginning through, to find what you want. Chris - Now presumably, you’ve tested this out on volunteer guinea pig scientists and another potential users. What do they say about it? Emilie - Yes, we have had our team of guinea pigs. So far we’ve done user-testing and all of the responses have been incredibly enthusiastic. They liked the idea of trying to rethink from scratch how to present the information and the scientific article online. We really took a sort of bottom-up approach, let’s figure out this is the information you want to get across, you have all this ability online, what’s the best way to structure it and not just take what work can print and transfer it? They really liked that approach, they liked what we’ve come up with. They had some very good suggestions for additional features we could add. So it will be an ongoing evolving project to continue to develop an article for an online environment that has more functionality than in print. Chris - Now obviously, this must involve additional investment on the part of your journal, in order to make this much richer online experience. So, how are you going to make it pay? Emilie - Well, actually the investment comes up, I think, in designing the prototypes. Today, scientists put a huge amount of effort into preparing articles for publication in a print format, both in terms of the text itself and the creation of all the figures. So there already is a lot of effort that goes in to producing a paper. I think with this new type of presentation, what types of information the authors have to provide to us will change but the total amount and workload involved won’t. So I think now that we set up the expectations and guidelines for what we need as publishers to be able to present the articles this way, the authors will supply us with some different types of figures etcetera, but once the transition is through the actual workload won’t change. There should not be any net increase in cost to produce it in this way. Chris - So we can all look forward to a much better online environment and we understand Emilie, it’s your birthday as well today. So, thank you very much for joining us on your birthday. You can go and have that glass of champagne now. Thank you very much. That was Emilie Marcus who’s the Editor-in-Chief of Cell, where they’re rolling out a whole brand new way of putting information onto the internet in a much more engaging fashion, so that it should be much easier to get access to that information and then learn from it. July 2009
Dropping EggsHow to stop an egg from breaking when dropped without any padding, and what it has to do with a womb. What you need
What to DoFirst try protecting the egg using just a strong box. Cut the bottle open around the widest part. Put an egg in the bottle and tape the bottle back up. Try dropping it from about waist height. Now try filling the bottle with salty water. Keep adding salt until the egg starts to float. Try dropping the bottle from waist height. Do you get the same result? What may HappenThe egg just in the bottle will smash, but in the salty water it should mostly survive. What is going on?If you drop an egg on the floor its speed changes from about 3m/s to stopped in a very short period of time, this means that is accelerates (decelerates) very rapidly. A large acceleration requires a large force and because this force is concentrated in one place the eggshell isn't strong enough to support this force and it breaks.
If you put the egg in a bottle the egg still stops rapidly and the force is still concentrated in one place so the egg still breaks.
However if the egg is floating in a fluid then the force that slows down the egg is upthrust, the same force which was making it float in the first place, which gets larger the larger the acceleration of the bottle.
This is one of the reasons that an unborn baby is surrounded by salty amniotic fluid because the baby is a similar density to the amniotic fluid it is floating, so if there are any impacts to the mother the forces are evenly transferred to the baby not doing it any damage.
Improving IVFDr Dagan Wells, Oxford UniversityKat - This is the Naked Scientists with Dr. Chris and Dr. Kat and we’re talking all about the science of pregnancy and conception. Now, many people manage to get pregnant doing it nature’s way, when mummy and daddy love each other very much. But some people need a little bit of medical help and that’s when they turn to in vitro fertilization. For some people, this is the only they're able to have their own children but at the moment, it is far from perfect and there’s quite a high failure rate. This can leave people obviously very distraught and out of pocket and sometimes, because often multiple embryos are put into women, people who just want one baby can end up to slightly more than that. Now, in a few minutes, we’ll be hearing how blood test could tell whether or not you’re suitable for IVF. But first, we’re joined Dr. Dagan Wells from Oxford University. Hello.
Kat - Hello. Just for a start, talk us through the IVF process. What’s it basically all about and what’s going on there? Dagan - Sure. Well, it’s been an enormously successful technique since it was developed in a little over 30 years ago now. It’s essentially a way that you can get around problems where maybe the egg is having difficulty making it through to the womb or sperm having difficulty making it to the egg or fertilizing the egg, and what happens is the woman actually undergoes a course of a hormonal treatment which allows her to generate multiple eggs in a single cycle, rather than the usual one that you would get in a typical monthly cycle. Those eggs are then taken out and outside the body their fertilized with her partner’s sperm and so that’s get around any possible difficulty that the sperm would have, reaching the egg and after that, several embryos are usually produced from these eggs and then the real challenge, and what we’ve really been working on, is trying to work out which of those embryos should actually be then transferred back to the mother. The idea is, ideally, that you transfer one back and then get one pregnancy and hopefully, one healthy baby out at the end. But the problem of is that actually multiple embryos are generated but they’re not all equal. They don’t all have an equal chance of making a baby and so, what we’re trying to do now is to find out which we should transfer. At the moment it’s bit of a luxury and just to increase the odds of success, it’s not unusual for an IVF centre to transfer several embryos and certainly, in other countries, in the U.K. it’s rarely more than two. Kat - So, tell us a bit about some of tests that you’ve been developing because I’ve actually, in my previous life as a scientist, worked on human embryos and I am sometimes amazed that any humans get pregnant at all. How can you tell what are good embryos and what are bad ones?
Kat - So, tell us a little bit about the way you’ve been testing because at the moment, they do a pre-implantation, genetic diagnosis on embryos when they’re just, you know, a few cells. Tell us about the technique that you’ve been developing. Dagan - Yes, that’s exactly right. There is an existing technique where a single cell is removed from the embryo, three days after fertilization. At which point, it usually is only consisting of about six to eight cells. So, at that point, you can take one cell and you can test it and you can look at about half of the chromosomes that are in there. And people have used that for a number of years. Some people have said that it’s helped considerably with pregnancies, but other people have said it doesn’t work at all and may actually would reduce the chance of the embryo making a baby. Now, the difference of what we’re doing now is we’re waiting an extra two days. Might not seem like much, but in those two days the embryo goes from just a handful of cells up to over a hundred cells. And that means that at that point, we can actually take several cells. Now, the effect of that is that we get a much more reliable test. Kat - And that doesn’t presumably do too much damage to the embryos. So if you’ve got a woman that the test says it’s all right, you are not going to be hideously harming it?
Kat - And how are you actually looking on the chromosomes? What’s the technique that you’re using? Dagan - Well, we’re using a method that was originally developed for looking at chromosome abnormalities in tumors which are of course, very common. They have a similar problem to what we have and that is very hard to actually get a cell, to show you its chromosomes from some cancers and certainly, from the cells of the embryos. So what we do is we actually take the DNA that makes up the chromosomes out of the cells and we actually colour it in, we label it with a fluorescent colour, and usually, we label the embryo cell DNA green. We then take some DNA from someone who we know has a normal set of chromosomes, they're exactly the right number and label their DNA with a red colour. We’ll mix those green and red DNAs together and we apply them to some chromosomes that are stuck on a microscope slide. Now what happens is the red and green DNAs kind of fight it out to stick down to these chromosomes. If they fight it out equally, all of the chromosomes get equally covered with red and green DNA, and you get kind of yellow colour from the mixing of those two colours. But if our embryo for example had one chromosomes too many, it’s going to have relatively more green DNA than it should, just because it’s got one chromosome more than it should. And so, one of chromosomes on the microscope, down on the microscopic slide, will end up looking more green than they ought to and that’s what gives away that there’s been an abnormality. Kat - Fantastic and so, just very briefly, are you actually using this to get successful pregnancies? What’s the success rate like when you do this test? Dagan - Yes, it’s a great question. That’s the real acid test at the end of the day. Well so far, we’ve done a prospective trial of this and this is in association with a centre in America called the Colourado Center for Reproductive Medicine. Now this isn’t a randomized trial, so it’s not really the gold standard study, but what it is, is a prospective trial which I think, is indicative. We’ve done about – well, over a hundred cycles now and the pregnancy rate is actually about 90% which is way higher than you would ever normally expect in IVF. Now, that has to now go ahead and be verified in a well controlled study which is what we’re going to be initiating actually in London in September of this year. July 2009 Blood Tests for IVF SuccessDr Cathy Allen, Rotunda Hospital, DublinChris - We've now heard how you can test embryos for vital clues as to which ones are probably the healthiest and therefore likely to result in a successful pregnancy, but what about testing mothers directly so that you can predict who's got the best IVF prospects? Well Dr Cathy Allen is at the Rotunda Hospital in Dublin where she's been working on just that sort of idea. Hello Cathy, welcome to the Naked Scientists, can you first of all tell us, what are you doing about this test, what have you actually discovered?
Chris - So Cathy, you're basically comparing healthy outcomes; In other words, IVF that’s successful and looking at whatever spectrum of markers get turned on with less good outcomes, in order to work whether there is a combination of markers that predict a good outcome? Cathy - Yes. Well one of the areas that we learn or one of the time points that we took was just before the potent drugs of IVF were given. So usually, in an IVF cycle, the first thing to do is to control the innate or natural hormonal cycle of the woman undergoing the treatment because you don’t want her own hormonal cycle to ovulate all of the stimulated eggs that are still in the ovary at the time point when you are not ready. Everything has to be very, very controlled. So basically, the pituitary gland in the brain is suppressed and this is usually as in a lot of centres, it’s about two weeks of the nasal spray before that the IVF proper begins. And at that time point, we were able to see in the bloods, in the characteristic gene profiles of the women who went on to become pregnant and those who were unsuccessful, we were able to see a very characteristic difference at that point. So, this is then something that we find very interesting and very exciting.
Cathy - Well, you know the, trying to manipulate genes and gene pathways is further down the line but first is to understand, this is all very new. So, we were able to kind of look as well what are the genes and what processes in the body are being involved in and the key areas that we found at the most prominent genes that were acting differently, that they were making, you know, biologically plausible sense. So, there were key areas like new blood vessels formation and inflammation, and oxidative stress and interestingly, our group has a lot of work on cancer and stem cells, and then it was the same source of profiles that you got from the early stem cells. So obviously, there’s a lot and more work to be done on this, but certainly, the two patient populations, those who went on to become pregnant, and those who didn’t, were very, very different indeed. So, it will be interesting to see if this could be developed into a sort of a profile or a signature of success or failure that could help people when they are on the IVF trail and then trying to see if they’re chances are good. Because at the moment, the prognostic tools that we have to guide patients, making these difficult decisions are really blunt basically. Female age and the past reproductive history and anything else and obviously, Dagan’s work is very exciting. But at the moment, we still use very broad statistics to guide our patients.
Cathy - Well, I don’t see that in the earlier or in the near future. I would hope that and this information may be useful really for people who have done IVF maybe once or twice and have, you know, for no good reason or knowing explicable reason and had to have no success, and I think these are the people that I would see where it’s extremely difficult for them to decide whether to, you know, throw the dice again, have another go of IVF or to call it a day. So, I think really, I think clinically, this sort of test would be probably useful for those individuals who have, you know, disappointment after disappointment. Chris - I’ve got an email here from Matthew who says, “I have a question that is related to this. Is it true that a woman’s degree of fertility or the amount of oestrogen that she produces depends on her genes? I’d be grateful if you could consider this.”
Chris - So, is your work suggesting then that some people are effectively genetically predestined not to get pregnant? Cathy - Well, I don’t think it’s in the genome that we inherit. I think it’s in the way that the genes themselves activate or are expressed. I mean basically, we all inherit our genes. We’re stuck with them whatever they are, but they don’t just stay static, you know during our lives. Genes are and are activated, upregulated and downregulated according to the different physiological process they're undergoing. For example, if you're recovering from an illness, certain genes will be turned on, certain genes will be turned off and really, you know, it’s the expression is differently controlled in the appropriate way and who knows what affects that. May be it’s our lifestyle, maybe it’s in the environment, maybe it’s just our physiology. But I think it’s not just predestined forever, you know, from the time you we’re born, no. Chris - Which is encouraging news. Thank you, Cathy. We have to leave it though. That was Dr. Cathy Allen. She’s based at the Rotunda Hospital in Dublin, where she’s been working on what blood tests can tell us about the possible prospects of a course of IVF. July 2009
Stress During PregnancyProfessor Vivette Glover,Imperial College LondonVivette - Well, we’re interested in how the emotional state of the mother during pregnancy affects the development of the foetus or the future child and what we’re finding is that quite a wide range or different sources of stressors; the mother’s more anxious, she has quarrels with her partner, can affect fetal development.
Vivette - Well, we recruit pregnant women and we ask them all sorts of questions about themselves, quite often we ask them to fill in questionnaires or we interview them. So, we find out different aspects of their emotional state. Meera - So what effect does their emotional state have on their foetus? Vivette - Well, we then follow up the child and what we find is that there’s quite a wide range of different effects it can have on the child. It could increase the risk of symptoms of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, ADHD, can increase the child’s level of anxiety, it can have an effect on their learning abilities, so they have a lower IQ and it can make them have a high level of conduct disorder of generally being hard to control. Different children are affected in different ways. So, we think this is probably an interaction with their genetic vulnerability. So, say if they are genetically vulnerable to anxiety that increases the risk of them becoming anxious children. Meera - And so, what is the actual connection between this so what happens as a result of the mother of being stressed to then have this effect on the baby?
Meera - It’s thought that the increase in the amount of cortisol reaching the baby could be perhaps be to do with an enzyme that isn’t functioning quite correctly, is that right? Vivette - That’s right what we think is happening is that the placenta usually has a very high level of the enzyme that breaks down cortisol and it has been shown in animals, and we are just studying now because we think it’s probably happening in humans, that the enzyme gets what’s called down regulated, it becomes less effective, so the barrier to cortisol becomes weaker, more cortisol goes through the placenta, but we’re studying on that right now. Meera - Well now, as part of your stand here at the Royal Society, you’ve actually got some human placentas on show. So I must admit it’s very intriguing to look at. So, could you take me through this placenta? Vivette - Well, this was delivered about a week ago. We’ve got it encased safely in a vacuum-packed bag bit like you might get meat in the supermarket so you can see the actual structure of the placenta, you can see the cord, you can see the foetal side and the maternal side. Meera - That’s quite a difference in colour between the foetal and the maternal side. Vivette - Yes, the placenta is actually made from the foetus and you might not know that the placenta has a sex. So, if the foetus is male the placenta is male and actually, male and female placentas behave in different ways. Meera - How do they behave differently? What do they do? Vivette - We’ll, we’re just starting to look at that, but for example, if the mother has asthma, the response of the placenta is quite different whether it’s a male or female placenta. Meera - And so, this difference in the male and female placenta, could that change if the mother is then stressed, so could that then have a different effect on the child?
Meera - And just lastly I guess, what is it about this increase in cortisol entering the child that has an affect on the child? What does it do to a baby? Vivette - Well it does a lot of things. It causes it to grow more slowly, so it can help to contribute to the baby, being born small for its gestational age, but it also affects how the brain develops. It depends on the time of exposure but different bits of the brain, the part of the brain that controls fear or controls memory come to be developed in different ways because it’s exposed to high levels of cortisol. Meera - And so once this is fully understood, is this just going to increase advice for mothers to basically trying to stay stress free? Vivette - Well I think that should be part of what’s more generally known in society. Mothers there’s a limit to how much they can do for themselves and I think, they should be advised to try and look after themselves and take time off and relax. But I think it’s also very important there should be more help given to pregnant mothers. I think the physical care in our country of pregnant women is very good. The emotional care of pregnant women has hardly started and I think if we could provide more emotional support, the appropriate kind, depending what the problem is, we could help the outcome and health, not just of the mother but of her child as well. July 2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The contents of this site are © The Naked Scientists® 2000-2010. The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||