MRI Scanning the StarsProfessor Alyssa Goodman, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for AstrophysicsChris - That’s exactly what Professor Alyssa Goodman from Harvard University is doing. She’s taking some of the systems that have been geared up to do better body scans with MRI and applying them to images of the night sky to enhance those pictures and she’s with us now. Hello Alyssa. Thank you for joining us. Tell us a bit more about this work.
Chris - Why is it such a problem, compiling images into three-dimensions like that? Alyssa - It turns out it’s less of a problem in other fields and in astronomy people are just not used to having that kind of information. They were starting to try to build their own software and then we realised that a lot of other people have faced this ad done a good job of, for example, making animated movies. You may know that Pixar and companies like that have some of the most powerful computers around. It turns out that 3D animations, moving 3D pictures is rather computationally intensive to do high resolution. People in other fields, as I mentioned before – notably medical imaging and in film, movies and Hollywood – had figured that out quite well. We’re trying to borrow on what they already learned. Chris - When you start doing this do your images literally come alive? Can you see things that, can you identify details that have previously been overlooked? Alyssa - One of the things that we’re interested in, in my own work which has to do with star formation, is what the impact of jets of material and expanding shells from stars have on the clouds that the stars are forming in. Imagine terrestrial clouds and you set off a bomb in it and you want to see if the expansion wave, some kind of sphere expanding from that bomb looks like. You’d really love to be able to see a 3D image of that. When stars set off either supernova explosions of just powerful winds from stars the same kind of thing happens to these clouds that they’re in. It’s very important for us to understand what that looks like. In a lot off cases it’s difficult to see that happening. It’s important to view what happens to these clouds over millions of years as they evolve. This software has let us, among other things, see the outflows and shells that come from these stars in a 3D way that the human brain understands which was very hard to see when looking at just slices of the images before. Chris - Can researchers begin to speculate that, in fact, our own solar system (in other words, the sun and our clutch of planets) actually get buffeted into existence by a big star nearby that was doing something similar to what you’re describing? It was putting a jet of material out which pushed a cloud of gas to make it fall into itself, which then formed us?
Chris - What are you looking at, at the moment? What’s the prime focus of study? Alyssa - Right now we have something we’ve been doing over the past five or six years called the COMPLETE Survey of Star-Forming Regions. That’s a long, funny acronym you can look up online. What it does is it looks at some of the nearby star-forming regions using every technique we can use from the ground. Optical wavelength and radio wavelength. Radio is where we can make these three dimensional images. With the Spitzer Space telescope, which is the infrared part of the Hubble telescope, has also looked at these same regions. They’re essentially targeted regions where we essentially want to understand the whole process of star formation. What we’ve been able to do with this 3D imaging project that we call astronomical medicine is to be able to give people 3D views of what these very large regions of space look like, to be able to put back together in our minds a picture of what’s going on. From that picture we make hypotheses. Recently our work is about the details of the role of self gravity, how likely little bits of this gas are to collapse over time on themselves and to understand whether our theories are right. The best way to do that is to see a picture of what they mean. We’ve been able to convince people that we think we’re on the right track. Chris - And you have some spectacular pictures on your own website. If anyone listening on the radio wants to check it out, where’s the web address so they can take a look at those pictures? Alyssa - The best way to do it is to just type my name: Alyssa Goodman in Google and I think it’s the first link that comes up. Alyssa's website can be found here, and there are some fantastic pictures, movies, virtual reality objects and even a 3d pdf available on the Harvard IIC Websites. February 2009 The Post Prandial Proceedings of the Cavendish SocietyDr Jeff Hughes, Manchester UniversityJeff - The post-prandial proceedings of the Cavendish Physical Society were a collection of after dinner songs that the research students sang at the annual Cavendish dinner every year. Some of the students were very good singers so they sang favourite songs of theirs. Some of them were very good aspiring lyricists and they re-wrote the words to some of the songs to reflect the events and personalities of the Cavendish Laboratory. They just told stories in their songs about what was going on in the lab.
Jeff - At the annual dinner the professor would be there, the head of the laboratory. There would be guests who would have been former students of the laboratory who had gone on to jobs and scientific eminence elsewhere. They'd be invited back and that would create a very nice sense of tradition and continuity with the past with the current students. The former laboratory members could be held up as role models for them as to what they might aspire to. Ben - A very good opportunity to meet some of the era-defining scientists of the time and, at the same time, have quite a lot of fun. Jeff - Absolutely. Could you imagine being in a dinner where you would see your head of department and a well-known Nobel prize winner standing on their chairs, linked arms singing Auld Lang Syne at the top of their voices. Ben - This sounds like a very casual thing. It happened at a yearly dinner but how do we know about it? This sort of thing usually would be a bit of an inside joke that would pass by unnoticed. Jeff - This was a very serious informal tradition. The students were so pleased with their own songs that they kept them. In 1904 they published them in a pamphlet and that was republished in six editions up to 1926. That's how we know about these songs. We know something from diaries and letters and so on about how they were actually performed. Ben - Could you give me an example of the sorts of lyrics that they were coming up with?
Of dons we can offer a charming variety All the big pots of the Royal Society Still there is no one of more notoriety Than our professor, the pride of us all. Here's to the health of professor JJ May he hunt lions for many a day And take observations and work out equations And find the relations which forces obey. When the professor has solved a new riddle Or found a fresh fact he's as fit as a fiddle. He goes to the tea room and sits in the middle And jokes about everything under the sun Then if you try to look grey at his jest You'll burst off the buttons that fasten your vest For when he starts chaffing though tea you'll be quaffing you cannot help laughing along with the rest Ben - This evening, we've seen some of them performed by the HBS choir, do you think this might be the first time they've been performed in, maybe, 100 years? Jeff - As far as I know, this is the first time that these, the three songs we've heard tonight, have been performed since probably the 1930s. Ben - So really, it's quite an historic event that we've been involved in? Jeff - Absolutely! Historians of science these days are really interested in re-creating historical experiments, what we've heard tonight is the recreation of historical songs, and I'm, absolutely thrilled.
March 2009 The Teslathon - High Voltage Fun!David Woodroffe, TeslathonBen - This week also saw the annual Teslathon, held at the Cambridge Museum of Technology. The Teslasthon sees enthusiastic amateurs get together to show off their home made tesla coils – high voltage devices based on the same principal as an electric transformer.
Derek - Teslathon is a group of people who are interested in high voltage electronics, Tesla coils and pretty much anything to do with high voltage, current, static electricity: all sorts of technology-related stuff like that. Ben - So really anything that can make a nice big spark. Derek - That’s very much part of it. Some of us try and make the biggest spark possible. Some of us try and do it in more interesting ways. Of course we try and push the modern technology to do something that couldn’t be done 18th century-wise by Tesla himself. Ben - How do Tesla coils work? They seem a very simple principle. Derek - They are a very simple principle. Effectively it’s a standard transformer with a primary and a secondary. What Tesla did was he also introduced resonance so the primary has an associated capacitance. The secondary has an associated capacitance. The two synchronise with each other and form a resonant coupling, very much like a young child pushing somebody on a swing. You can get a very small movement that can be made into a very large movement just by the process of resonant rise or multiplication. Ben - And this enables you to have huge voltages and this is what gives you these lightning-like forks that seem to be flying across the room behind us. Derek - That’s right. Some of the coils start at about 240 volts. They quite often cheat and go up to 10,000 volts or so into the primary of the coil. Then, due to resonant rise in the way the Tesla coil is constructed we’ll get 100,000 volts or 200,000 volts from the top. But because it is high frequency AC that means we can then push quite a lot of power into a spark or an arc which will then grow much longer than the 100,000 volts sounds. Ben - And that’s why they do seem to be reaching out and fingering their way across the room. There are some really huge forks of lightning across here. Is it actually safe? Derek - No. Is the simple answer. Like most things that are interesting or fun it isn’t safe. You have to be very careful. Most of the people in this room have been doing it for very many years. They know their equipment because they’ve had to build it from scratch. It’s not something you can just go out and buy. There is inherent safety: we all abide by a set of rules for the safe running of these sorts of events. People have to stand back from the equipment. The equipment has to be able to be made safe but obviously there is that inherent danger. Any high voltages, high currents, unpredictable equipment you’ve got to view with a degree of distrust. Ben - I’d imagine that the element of distrust you have means you have to be fairly reserved in public. The people who come along to the Teslathon this weekend won’t really see the full power of what your devices can do. Derek - They will see a limited amount. There are some things certainly that we wouldn’t do in a public environment that we would do in private. Obviously there’s the safety of the public and the people who are watching the Tesla coils here today is absolutely paramount. We don’t want to hurt anybody. It would really ruin the enjoyment of the whole event for everybody. Ben - Cambridge Industrial Museum, where we are today, seems like a very appropriate setting for this. I understand you come back each year to do another Teslathon here. Does it feel like home? Derek - Certainly for me. I’ve been doing this for about seven years now and the actual Teslathon has been here to my knowledge for 9 or 10. It’s usually on the same weekend every year, which for some reason happens to be Halloween. I don’t know whether that’s by planning or by accident! We’ve always been very welcome here and obviously with the connection to 18th century technology we seem to fit in very well with the other machines and equipment at the pumping station. Of course, we all like to go and have a look round that sort of technology too. October 2008 Fruit FireballsYou may think that oranges seem are a fairly boring sort of fruit. Discover their more exciting side in this simple experiment. What you need
What to DoIf you bend a piece of orange peel you often get a spray of orange oily stuff coming out. The idea is to direct this spray upwards into the side of a candle flame. Be careful, this can be more effective than you expect. Make sure that your hands and anything else easily damaged by flame is below the candle flame!What may HappenYou should be able to produce an impressive fireball as the spray hits the flame.
. What is going on?Oranges have a peel which includes little compartments full of oily substances. When you bend the peel the outer layer of skin is stretched, and these compartments are flattened. This squashes them until they eventually fail squirting out their contents in the form of a spray.
The oils which spray out are hydrocarbons - a bit like petrol - and are highly flammable, and you have sprayed them out of the orange, so they are very well mixed with air. This means that the oxygen from the air can get to the oil in many places at the same time, so it burns very quickly in a fireball. Why do oranges have such flammable skins?Oranges are a fruit, they are designed to get a large animal to eat them, then move somewhere else and to deficate the undigested seeds in a nice blob of fertiliser somewhere distant from the parent plant where it won't be competing for resources. So an orange tree wants its fruit to be eaten by large animals, but not by insects and fungi. The oily skin is waterproof, so it is difficult for fungi to get a hold, and the oils are both poisonous and repellant to insects - this is why citronella is such a good mosquito repellent. It just so happens they are also very flammable. Written by Dave Ansell How useless is a Chocolate Teapot?You have heard the saying, but it is meaningless unless you know exactly how useful a chocolate teapot actually is. We try to find out how thick the walls of a chocolate teapot would have to be to let you brew tea... What you need
What to DoPart of the reason that chocolate is so irresistible is the way that it is made up of a variety of fats, both from the cocoa bean and in many cases milk or even vegetable. These fats happen to melt at just below body temperature so the chocolate melts in your mouth. This is why chocolate is so obviously a bad material for making teapots, hence the phrase "as useless as a chocolate teapot"!
So we got several short pieces of perspex tubing and poured various amounts of molten chocolate into the bottom to form a plug of chocolate in the bottom of each tube. We then added boiling water of a similar depth to a teapot. We then waited to see when the chocolate plugs would fail. As we had no idea how thick the chocolate would have to be, we made a series of chocolate plugs ranging from 10mm to 80mm. We also used dark chocolate to give the teapot the best chance possible, as this has a higher melting point than milk or white chocolate. We also left all the chocolate in the fridge until a few minutes before the experiment. As it turned out only the 10mm thickness of chocolate failed and even that took about 3 minutes - almost as long as it takes to brew some tea! Armed with this knowledge we set out to manufacture a chocolate teapot. Manufacturing the teapot
As 10mm of chocolate wasn't quite enough to brew tea properly and a real teapot is larger than our model and so would undergo larger forces, we decided to make the walls approximately 20mm thick. The teapot was made by melting down about 1.3kg of chocolate, pouring some into the bottom of a bowl and allowing it to set to form a base. We then put a smaller bowl in the middle to form an inner mould and pouring chocolate in between the two bowls. Removing the bowls was quite easy once you heated them up with boiling water. We then made a spout using two cylinders of grease proof paper which chocolate generously splurged in between. We then drilled a hole into the side of the 'bowl' using a potato peeler and welded the spout back on using some more molten chocolate. We also made a handle using more chocolate and welded that on, though this was more for appearance rather than any real practical purpose! We then used the leftover chocolate to make a rather insubstantial lid, to complete the appearance of a genuine teapot. The moment of truth then arrived and we tried to brew a pot of tea, so we put in a couple of (earl grey) teabags, added some boiling water, put on the lid, and waited... What may HappenAfter only about half a minute the lid started to melt, but otherwise the teapot survived its experience in one piece if not entirely unscathed. The tea was slightly unusual and sweet, but not unpleasant.
The teapot survived, but not completely unscathed...
ConclusionSo a chocolate teapot is really not very useful, but slightly more so than you would expect, which is an interesting reinterpretation of the old adage! Now all we have to do is work out what to do with 1.3kg of chocolate, and enjoy our tea!
What is going on?When chocolate melts it doesn't become totally liquid immediately, it remains quite viscous. Unless you apply a fairly large force to the melted chocolate, it seems to sit there. Chocolate is also mostly made of fat, which is a good thermal insulator (whales use blubber as a form of insulation). This means that the molten chocolate near the hot water protects the less molten chocolate below it, insulating it from the heat of the water. Also, it takes a significant amount of energy to melt chocolate, so it will take a significant amount of time to move heat into the solid chocolate, thus slowing its melting.
Light Bulbs in Liquid NitrogenWhat would happen if you put a light bulb in a bucket of liquid nitrogen? And would it still work if it were just a filament? What you needWhen Dr Hal came to visit us he brought a lovely exeriment along. First he put a lit light bulb in liquid nitrogen and then a bare filament.
What is going on?
Liquid nitrogen is non conductive so having the electrical contacts surrounded with liquid nitrogen is no more dangerous than the gaseous nitrogen, which they are normally surrounded by in the air. So when the power is turned on the filament can heat up to white heat as normal and glow as you would expect in the open air. What is more surprising is that the filament still lights up when it is directly in the liquid nitrogen. This is because conventional light bulbs produce a huge amount of heat energy. This goes into evaporating the liquid nitrogen which forms an insulating bubble around the filament, allowing it to heat up and glow. Nitrogen is very unreactive so despite the fact that the filament is at about 2000°C the nitrogen doesn't react with it. However, if the filament is taken out into the open air it reacts very quickly with the oxygen surrounding it to form tungsten trioxide (WO3), which forms the cloud of smoke around it and the filament rapidly breaks and dies.
Written by Dave Ansell Dry Ice Experiments and BombsDr Hal showed us some things to do with dry ice; including the highly dangerous dry ice bomb. What you needSomething you will have probably seen in every cheesy film involving anything slightly scientific is bubbling pots producing huge quantiites of smoke. These all use dry ice, that is CO2 cooled below its sublimation point of -78°C (194K). This causes it to crystallise directly to form a solid known as dry ice. If you put this very cold solid in water it rapidly heats up above -78°C and sublimes straight back to being a gas. This warms up to room temperature very quickly and expands by a factor of 750. If the dry ice is put into warm water, the water evaporates on the surfaces of the bubbles forming water vapour. When this meets the cold carbon dioxide gas it condenses forming billions of tiny water droplets which make up a small cloud. Because this cloud is in carbon-dioxide, and as gas denser than air, it sinks. So it can form a cloud sitting on the floor, an effect often used theatrically on stage. It is possible to use the expansion of dry ice as it boils and a strong pressure vessel to produce what is known as a dry ice bomb. This works on the same principle as the Liquid nitrogen bomb we did a few months ago. These are very very dangerous, they are extremely violent and go off very quickly. Do not even think of doing this at home.
Dr Hal demonstrated this by putting a lot of dry ice in a lemonade bottle. He then added lots of boiling water to supply it with plenty of heat, put the bottle behind a blast shield and screwed on the lid. The dry ice keeps subliming producing carbon-dioxide gas and the pressure builds up. Despite a lot of the gas dissolving in the water eventually the pressure builds up enough to make the bottle fail. Lemonade bottles are very strong and often fail at over 10 atmospheres, so the resulting explosion is very violent. Written by Dave Ansell Chemistry in its Element - ThalliumHenry Nicholls, Freelance Science JournalistDuring World War I, Agatha Christie worked in a hospital and then a pharmacy, an experience that could explain the presence of poisons in many of her plots. In The Pale Horse, a thriller published in 1961, the star of the show was thallium, also known as “the poisoner’s poison” because many salts of this soft, silvery metal is soluble in water, producing a colourless, odourless and tasteless liquid with a delayed effect on the victim. Here’s an excerpt from the dramatic climax in which the novel’s narrator Mark Easterbrook solves the mystery of several unexplained deaths.
“Listen,” I said, “is Ginger’s hair coming out by the roots in handfuls?” “Well – as a matter of fact I believe it is. High fever, I suppose.” “Fever my foot,” I said. “What Ginger’s suffering from, what they’ve all suffered from, is thallium poisoning. Please God, may we be in time...” Christie may have got the idea for her plot a few years’ earlier in 1957, when the KGB attempted to assassinate Nikolai Khokhlov, a former KGB assassin himself who had defected to the United States. In turn Christie’s dramatic and detailed description of the symptoms of thallium poisoning in The Pale Horse is thought to have saved at least two lives and led to the arrest and conviction of a British factory worker who had used thallium to kill his stepmother, two work colleagues and nauseate around 70 others. It is so dangerous because thallium has similar biological properties to potassium ions, hijacking the ubiquitous sodium/potassium membrane pump to smuggle itself into cells throughout the body interfering with the important roles played by potassium. Thallium is pretty abundant in the earth’s crust, found in several selenium-containing minerals. Indeed, it was whilst cooking up one such compound in 1861 that British chemist William Crookes noted that “suddenly a bright green line flashed into view and quickly disappeared.” He knew he was onto a new element and called it thallium after the Greek for green shoot or twig – thallos. The following year, he succeeded in isolating small quantities of the element, but nowhere near the quantities obtained by French chemist Claude-Auguste Lamy who was working away independently with a greater bulk of raw material. When, in 1862, Lamy was awarded a medal at the International Exhibition in London For the discovery of a new and abundant source of thallium, Crookes had a fit and it was only with his election to the Royal Society in 1863 – largely on the back of his thallium work – that the cross-channel spat for priority died down. Subsequent work on the chemistry of thallium showed it to have similar properties to several other elements, including silver, mercury and lead. So much so that French chemist Jean-Baptiste Dumas later dubbed it the “ornithorhyncus, or duck-billed platypus of the metals.” The raw material on which both Crookes and Lamy worked came from waste products deposited during the manufacture of sulphuric acid. The commercial production of thallium today is not dissimilar, with the metal mostly recovered as a by-product of smelting iron, zinc or lead sulphides to make sulphur dioxide. The resulting thallium contains the two naturally occurring stable isotopes, with around 30% of it made up of atomic mass 203 and the remaining 70% comprised of atomic mass 205.
Alongside the two stable isotopes, there are a further 23 radioisotopes, though most of them with fleeting half lives. One of them, thallium 201, is useful in nuclear medicine. Its injected into the bloodstream and will find its way into all tissues with the help of the sodium/potassium membrane pump. This can then reveal to the clinician any part of the body not bathed in blood or where the membrane transporter is not working properly. In particular, it is used to image the blood flow to heart muscle in patients suspected of coronary artery disease. Thankfully, with a suitably short half-life of just 72.5 hours, Thallium 201 disappears from the body long before it can cause the lethal damage of the more stable isotopes. In The Pale Horse, Agatha Christie was not as explicit about the treatment for thallium poisoning as she was about its symptoms. “Do they know how to treat thallium poisoning?” asks the narrator Mark Easterbrook when he reaches the hospital where the hair-shedding Ginger has been taken. “You don’t often get a case of it,” the investigating officer Inspector Lejeune tells him. “But everything possible will be tried.” It was, and for those who like their happy endings you’ll be pleased to know that Ginger makes a full recovery from the thallium poisoning that had stricken her down. For more Chemistry in its Element, or the latest in Chemistry news from Chemistry World - visit the Royal Society of Chemistry's Website. August 2009 Cool Chemistry with Dr HalDr Hal, Brighton UniversityThis week, Dr Hal showed us the following cool chemistry experiments:
August 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Information presented on this website is the opinion of the individual contributors and does not reflect the general views of the administrators, editors, moderators, sponsors, Cambridge University or the public at large. The contents of this site are © The Naked Scientists® 2000-2012. The Naked Scientists® and Naked Science® are registered trademarks.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||