|
|
Science News
|
A Harvard-based research team have successfully produced a miniature movie of the generation of platelets, the key elements that allow blood to clot.
Tobias Junt and his co-workers used a fluorescent... |
|
Scientists have worked out why it is so difficult to mix ingredients into a cake. Emmanuelle Gouillart and a team from CEA Saclay near Paris have been studying how things mix together in a bowl. He ad... |
|
Researchers in Tbilisi, Georgia, have uncovered the oldest human remains ever found outside of Africa, a species of Homo which might even have returned to Africa to spawn modern man.
The Georgian Na... |
|
Scientists in Japan have discovered that thunderstorms act as huge particle accelerators. Harafumi Tsuchita of Japan's RIKEN research institute and collegues installed a directional gamma ray detector... |
|
Scientists have solved a long-running conundrum connecting high levels of air pollution with an increased risk of heart attacks and strokes.
Writing in the Journal of Clinical Investigation, Gokhan ... |
Kitchen Science
Make yourself an electromagnet powered by a small battery and find out some of the mysteries of magnetism.
|
Question of the Week
|

|
Diana finds out how sea birds can see both underwater and in the air, and we learn how you can train yourself to do so too!
|
| Interviews
|
Professor Noel Sharkey, Sheffield University
|
Sarah Sims & Jonathan Davies, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute
|
|
Professor Jim Little and Dr Per-Erik Forssen, University of British Columbia
|
|
Professor Nigel Shadbolt, University of Southampton & President of the British Computer Society.
|
Questions

|
Do you get wetter if you run or walk through the rain?
|
|
|
The simplest answer is it depends on the rain, but if we assume that the rain is falling constantly and is falling straight down and you don't change shape as you walk, you will get wetter if you walk.
This is because the rain can hit you in two ways, it can hit all your horizontal surfaces by just falling on them, or it can hit your front by you walking into it. If there is no wind, the amount of rain that hits you on the front is just dependent on the amount of space you walk though, so how far you walk. If we assume that this is a constant the only thing that will change is the amount of rain that actually falls on your horizontal surfaces which is just dependent on how long you are in the rain for, so running probably does make sense.
Of course in the real world everything is a bit more complex, if there is a wind moving with you it may pay to move a little slower as you can get to where you are going without walking though any rain, just have it fall on your head by walking at the same speed as the wind.
Also if you are in a very short thunder shower that will finish quickly it may pay to move slowly during the shower as you won't run into any rain while it is at it's heaviest.
Although I still think in general running is your best strategy, unless you trip up and twist your ankle...
|

|
I accidentally put a cast iron le crueset pot in my microwave oven for 20 seconds, It flashed - nothing cracked and there was a burning smell.
My question is - would it have contaminated the food in the pot?
|
|
|
I guess the cast iron pot had a cast iron lid as well. Microwaves cause electric currents to flow through metal, so you would get a current flowing through both the pot and the lid. If the pot and the lid were insulated from each other, and there was enough voltage, you would get a spark as the current jumped between the pot and the lid. This would explain the flash, and it may have damaged the enamel on the surface. The spark is incredibly hot, and so this could have vapourized some of the enamel, which may be the cause of the smell.
It's unlikely that cookware manufacturers use anything too toxic in the enamel, as you may scrub bits loose and they could wind up in the food. So although there may have been some enamel in the food, it should be relatively safe and in such tiny quantities that the food would not have been dangerous.
|

|
This summer I've taken up playing guitar. Unfortunately, all I have is a steel-stringed guitar and it is forming some pretty wicked calluses on my fingers. I've noticed that the little mouse pad on my laptop no longer responds to the tips of my callused fingers. It responds perfectly with the fingerprints of all fingers and with the tips of my right hand. The click-wheel of my ipod responds to my callused fingers. What gives? What is it about the mouse pad on my computer that leads it to no longer acknowledges the existence of my left finger tips?
|
|
|
I think that trackpads on laptops work by having two sets of wires, one running horizontally and one vertically, and they they look at the capacitance between the two of them - so if you make a voltage with one of them, how much is that voltage picked up by the other one. If you put your finger near it, this changes quite considerably, in fact if you put anything conductive near it it will change. The problem is that if you've got thick, dry, calloused skin on the tip of your finger, this acts as an insulator and stops this effect from happening. The ipod click wheel is either more sensitive, or possibly pressure sensitive.
|

|
Re the effect of calloused finger tips caused by metal guitar strings does this account for the fact that when I tried to teach an old friend to use a laptop she couldn't make the cursor move although I could ? Does this mean that with an ageing population computer designers may have to produce more sensitive touch pads geared to the changed skin in older finger tips?
|
|
|
As you age, your skin tends to get thinner, so it's unlikely to be the same effect as with the guitar string callouses. In fact, thinner skin should be picked up more easily by the trackpad system. Obviously, it depend on your life history - maybe your mature friend is a thrash metal guitarist?
|
| Robots and Artificial Intelligence - More about this podcastI, Robot
This week on the Naked Scientists the robots are taking over! And no, we don’t mean a robotic version of Dr Chris. We’ll be finding out from Professor Noel Sharkey about the current capabilities of our metal minions, while Professor Nigel Shadbolt will reveal the future of Artificial Intelligence. Could the Naked Scientists ever be replaced by robots? We also hear from the winners of an exciting challenge for robot builders, and how machines are being used in labs to push forward the frontiers of genetic science.

Are our friends electric?
Professor Noel Sharkey from the University of Sheffield is a leading expert on robotic technology – as well as being chief judge on the TV programme Robot Wars. On this week’s show Noel will explain what today’s robots are capable of. Far from being a sci-fi dream, robots are now involved in many aspects of our lives, and we even have automaton soldiers on the front line in Iraq. We’ll be asking Noel where he thinks robotics science is heading. Are we going to see fleets of programmed metal killing machines, or will robots make life easier and better for the rest of us?
"Free Thinking Machines or Murderous Intellects?”
This controversial topic was the title of Professor Nigel Shadbolt’s talk on artificial intelligence at the recent BA Festival of Science in York. Nigel, who is from Southampton University, joins us to mull over our fears and hopes for AI, as well as explaining the reality. Will we ever see our own Dr Chris replaced by a shiny, emotionless robot – or has it already happened?
Desperately seeking robots
Lost your specs? Or maybe you’re looking for a Charlie Chaplin poster? Professor Jim Little and Per-Erik Forssen tell us about a competition to develop robots that can track down unseen objects. The Semantic Robot Vision Challenge gets teams to build robots capable of finding an object using image searching and analysis. Jim and Per-Erik are members of the University of British Columbia team that built this year’s winning robot – Curious George.
Robots in lab coats
Finally, our roving Naked Scientist Meera Senthilingam will be heading over to the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute outside Cambridge to find out how robots are helping out in the lab. They may not have to wear lab coats, but they’re making a big impact on genetic research. They’re also cheaper and more accurate than human scientists, although they won’t buy you a drink in the pub after work.
Are robots really taking over the world? Find out on the Naked Scientists this week.
Kat Arney |
|
|