Listen Now Download as mp3 m4a or Subscribe Free

• 

  02:03 - Gecko Glue

• 

  04:56 - Banned drug gives clues to depression treatment

• 

  06:58 - Molecular billiards

• 

  09:45 - The eyes have it – or do they?

• 

  11:57 - Lemon-Powered iPod - Fruit batteries

  There have been various spoof films showing how to charge your ipod using fruit and vegetables. But is it actually possible? Find this out along with how a battery works.

• 

  16:04 - Guess your Age

• 

  23:14 - The Painting Fool

• 

  29:58 - Second Life

• 

  38:47 - Data Recovery

  Is that file you deleted really gone? Could someone retrieve your passwords from an old hard disk? We ask Graham Henley...

• 

  45:55 - Size of Smell Sense

  When I hear a musical note, my perception of its loudness is directly related to how loud it actually is. No matter whether it's a high note or a low note or a trumpet or a piano, something that's loud sounds loud and something that's quiet sounds quiet. Does it work the same ...

• 55:39 - If I get sunburnt easily will I get skin cancer easily too?

  I'm pale skinned, red headed and I burn very easily. Since I'm prone to sunburn am I therefore more likely to get skin cancer?

Related Content

Comments

Deletion of a hard drive does nothing.  It is the overwriting of the hard drive that actually physically removes the data.  There is some talk that one can still detect residual signals from the original data even when new data has been written over it, but I would have thought that even if you could technically detect some residual signal, trying to seperate the residual signal from the new data that you have overwritten it with would be next to impossible.

The bigger risk is if overwriting the data does not overwrite every track of the original data (e.g. if some of the original data has been subsequently marked as a bad track, and prohibits you from writing over it, but still allowing somebody who can bypass the electronics of the drive to read most of the original track).

Nonetheless, the only people likely to be doing this are going to have very specialist equipment, and if you are not doing anything criminal, and are not managing particularly sensitive data, then few people with that level of sophistication of equipment are likely to be that concerned about what you have on your hard drive.  This is not to say that you should not be careful about the data, only that the degree of care has to take into account just how much effort it is worthwhile for others to undertake to obtain the data from your drive. another_someone, Sun, 2nd Mar 2008

Which is what the above programme does. Overwriting, erasing...tomato, tomato paul.fr, Sun, 2nd Mar 2008

Graham and I did discuss the chance that data could be recovered after just one overwrite, due to a 'magnetic resonance' effect which may indicate what position each bit had previously been in.  Sadly, we had to remove this from the interview due to time constraints.

One overwrite will stop the vast majority of people from retrieving data with easily available software, but the determined could get something out of it.  Apparently with early hard drives they recommended wiping 32 times, but with modern discs you shouldn't need more than 6-7 wipes. BRValsler, Mon, 3rd Mar 2008

Blimey, that's a shock. Thanks for that bombshell Ben; I'd never have believed it.

Chris chris, Sun, 9th Mar 2008

In the Computer Forensics part of the show, it seemed (to me)to be implied that erasing your hard drive just once was good enough to prevent people recovering your data. If I heard right, then that is false. You need to erase the drive multiple times to even stand a chance.

I wipe my drives routinely 35 times using the gutman method, this free piece of software is what i use.
http://heidi.ie/eraser/download.php paul.fr, Thu, 5th Nov 2009

See the whole discussion | Make a comment