Nick Lacey, Garuda, Australia asked:
My question of the week is about the acoustics of the didgeridoo. Could you please explain the science behind the cubic capacity of the internal chamber of the didgeridoo, in relation to it's length? Also, if they are tuned to a western key, are they louder than an off-key didgeridoo?
Neville Fletcher, Australia National University:
Over the past few years we’ve been doing a nice research project on the didgeridoo. It’s the trunk of a small tree that’s been hollowed out by termites, cleaned out, and somewhere between 1 and 1.5m long typically. It can either be pretty much cylindrical or flaring a bit depending on the sort of tree it’s come from. It’s played by blowing it very much as you would blow a trumpet or a trombone by vibrating your lips. The longer the didgeridoo the lower the note it will make. If it’s about 1.5m long it makes a drone which is about 2 octaves below middle C. That’s about 65 vibrations per second, if it’s cylindrical. If it’s conical so that it flares out at the far end then it plays a higher note. And if it’s shorter it also plays a higher not rather like the fact that a trumpet plays a much higher note than a trombone, for instance.
The main thing about a didgeridoo is that you can change the actual sound quality and doing that the player changes the shape of his mouth by moving his tongue: very much as you would if you’re saying vowels. If you go, “aaaeeeiiiuuu.” In addition people have developed a technique called circular breathing where you fill up your cheeks with air to keep the drone going and then you quickly snatch a breath through your nose. You can keep the sound going for minutes and minutes at a time.
Physics will be similar to organ pipes ...
McGonagall? Why bring the worst poet the British Isles has ever produced into it? DoctorBeaver, Sat, 31st May 2008
I doubt it because your couplet actually rhymes. McGonagall was unaware of that concept. DoctorBeaver, Sun, 1st Jun 2008
Returning to the original topic...
I heard it said by a well-informed person that an aboriginal is never more than 20 minutes from water. In other words, wherever the aboriginal is, he can find water within 20 minutes. If that is true then it would seem to negate the need for a water vessel. Aboriginals wander far & wide, and water is heavy. In that heat, you would want to carry as little weight as possible. And have you ever felt the weight of a didjeridu?
The point of the beeswax is to improve the embouchure. It is tailored to suit the player's lips so that they vibrate 'just right' whilst losing as little breath as possible. This make circular breathing much easier and stops you falling over after a few minutes of playing. lyner, Sun, 1st Jun 2008
In the same way stringed musical instruments originated from the bow* (of "bow and arrow"),
RD - it's an interesting theory, but for reasons I gave earlier I don't believe it to be the case. In addition, there are much better natural vessels for carring water available in Australia & I don't see using a didj as being preferable or even particularly practical.
The large diameter of the didgeridoo would make it a very poor blowpipe.
I wasn't saying the didj would make a good blowpipe. When using a conventional blowpipe, the user may have gotten an interesting, flute-like noise from it & wondered if other, similarly-shaped items could also produce that sound. He may have noticed that a larger capacity pipe made a deeper, more resonant sound. Keep going & you end up with a didj, or something akin to it.