Naked Science Forum
Life Sciences => Physiology & Medicine => Topic started by: thedoc on 08/07/2014 17:57:10
-
Cycling fans were devastated when Lance Armstrong was found guilty of systematic doping. But how can we prevent this in future?
Read a transcript of the interview by clicking here (http://www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/content/interviews/interview/1000780/)
or [chapter podcast=1000743 track=14.07.08/Naked_Scientists_Show_14.07.08_1002468.mp3](https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thenakedscientists.com%2FHTML%2Ftypo3conf%2Fext%2Fnaksci_podcast%2Fgnome-settings-sound.gif&hash=f2b0d108dc173aeaa367f8db2e2171bd) Listen to it now[/chapter] or [download as MP3] (http://nakeddiscovery.com/downloads/split_individual/14.07.08/Naked_Scientists_Show_14.07.08_1002468.mp3)
-
Many substances could potentially be tested for by taking hair, toenail, or fingernail samples, which would give a much longer period of testing. Say, if you could recover 6 months of data from a toenail scraping, then it would be harder to fool the tests.
Natural "steroids" are a problem, and much harder to test for. Perhaps one could convince manufacturers to make 13C substituted testosterone, then come up with a test to screen for it. However, that would undoubtedly significantly increase the manufacturing cost. Such a substitution would likely have no effect on those individuals with legitimate use of the drug. Of course, somewhere there would be a rogue manufacturer making human equivalent testosterone without the marker.
-
The biggest problem is people competing with an inherited genetic advantage. If we could eliminate that, then the racing could be a lot more fair.