0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I see that your comments on the patents world have been misconstrued!Quote from: jerrygg38 on 08/06/2009 23:20:43 Did you pay these labs to do the work? Did your lawyer ask for the additional payment? I am afraid that people are willing to mislead you for their financial benefit. Did a friend help you? Some of the people here are rough. I do not think any want to hurt you. Vern is especially a kind person.
Did you pay these labs to do the work? Did your lawyer ask for the additional payment? I am afraid that people are willing to mislead you for their financial benefit. Did a friend help you? Some of the people here are rough. I do not think any want to hurt you. Vern is especially a kind person.
Quote from: sophiecentaur on 09/06/2009 16:57:13I see that your comments on the patents world have been misconstrued!Quote from: jerrygg38 on 08/06/2009 23:20:43 Did you pay these labs to do the work? Did your lawyer ask for the additional payment? I am afraid that people are willing to mislead you for their financial benefit. Did a friend help you? Some of the people here are rough. I do not think any want to hurt you. Vern is especially a kind person. Sophiecentaur - your comments regarding the misconstruction of JerryGG38's reference to patents. I was specifically referencing this. I don't think it's ambiguous. He was clearly concerned that attorneys were co-operating on something they did not take seriously simply to enrich themselves at my expense. He doesn't clarify who it is that he thinks is rough.
His comments are quite correct. It is a business and they will take your money if they think there is the remotest chance of producing a valid patent. They're not interested in whether the invention can make you money - it's not their job. Are they likely to turn away good business?
I was assuming that the 555 timer / oscillator could have been fed from elsewhere.I don't subscribe to Magic, any more than you, jg38!I think I made the suggestion way back that, suitable ways of drawing current from a battery could make it function as a primary cell, delivering more energy than it was originally charged with. That could only be ascertained after thousands of hours of operation and a completely flat battery.However, I think, as you do, that it is far more likely that there is some measurement flaw which might be glaringly obvious if we actually played with the system. But I couldn't be naffed to go to all that effort to try to reproduce a fault on a circuit which is of very little interest in the first place.There is a big snag that witsend's descriptions and the use of some terms are so non standard that it is difficult to determine exactly what to think. Some necessary information seems to be jealously guarded and without it it's even harder to spot the flaw. I really don't think she actually wants anyone to find a flaw. I must say that, If I were her, I would be incredibly relieved when someone found it. I have been, in the past, when I've seen 'Magical' results in my own experiments.
That's why I put this circuit together.
As I have said before, you hypothesis needs to explain everything else too, if it is correct. SophiecentaurAt the risk of attack. I believe it does.