The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side
Science Experiments
Relative Molecular Masses in Thermite
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Relative Molecular Masses in Thermite
2 Replies
6207 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
wr2202
(OP)
First timers
1
Activity:
0%
Relative Molecular Masses in Thermite
«
on:
20/06/2014 15:15:24 »
Hi! I'm new here, so I don't know if I've posted this in the correct place, please tell me if I haven't!
Okay, so I was making some nice homemade thermite for a bit of fun, and I've got my atomised aluminium powder and iron III oxide. Google tells me that the ratio of iron oxide to aluminium most people stick to is 8:3, so I thought I'd do the equations myself to check the chemistry behind this. These are the relative atomic masses that I got from Wikipedia, rounded to 3 decimal places:
Fe: 55.845
O: 15.999
Al: 26.982
The equation for the thermite reaction is Fe2O3 + 2Al --> 2Fe + Al2O3. Which makes the relative formula masses:
Fe2O3: 159.687
2Al: 53.964
Total reactants: 213.651
So if I'm right so far, surely that makes the percentages:
Fe2O3: 74.74% (159.687 / 213.651)
2Al: 25.26% (53.994 / 213.651)
This ratio is almost exactly 9:3 (3:1), which makes me wonder why the recognised ratio is 8:3. Have I missed something? I just wondered if anyone could clear this up for me, because I hate not knowing why I'm wrong!
Thanks!
«
Last Edit: 20/06/2014 15:18:46 by anonymous_moron
»
Logged
chiralSPO
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum King!
3739
Activity:
0.5%
Thanked: 529 times
Re: Relative Molecular Masses in Thermite
«
Reply #1 on:
22/06/2014 18:22:48 »
There is a reason that the experimentally determined optimum is more "aluminum rich" than you would find by calculation. The exact best proportion depends on the particle size and purity of the aluminum powder, but it is a pretty safe bet that each particle is not entirely aluminum. In the case of "pure" atomized aluminum, there will be a small coating of aluminum oxide at the surface (where the aluminum has reacted with air)--this increases the mass of the aluminum, and decreases the available fuel, as compared to what you would calculate. One can also find aluminum that does not have an oxide coating, but is instead coated in plastic or wax--this has the same effect on the calculations.
Logged
fishmicon
First timers
2
Activity:
0%
Re: Relative Molecular Masses in Thermite
«
Reply #2 on:
02/02/2015 10:46:02 »
that does newbielink:http://www.mmovegas.com/fifa-15-coins.html
[nonactive]
not have an oxide coating
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...