0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Is ''light'' anti-matter?
>E = > 4/3 pi r³ = >V= <D where V is volume and D is density
QuoteIs ''light'' anti-matter?noQuote >E = > 4/3 pi r³ = >V= <D where V is volume and D is density drivel. Please study dimensional analysis and check that your ex nihilo equations at least meet the criterion of dimensional balance.
I just hope your syntactic ambiguity is up to scratch.
One observation, that might offer insight, that is overlooked and even reasoned away, is the preponderance of the universal data has the positive charge of the universe attached to the proton, while negative charge of the universe is attached to the electron. Although the opposite situation is possible and is called anti-matter; positron and anti-proton, the vast preponderance of the observed universal data is proton and electron.Does the preponderance of data, rule the day, and mean that positive charge has slightly more affinity for the heavier mass; proton, while negative charge have slightly more affinity for the lighter mass; electron? The opposite is possible but defines higher potential at the level of what binds charge to mass. In all of chemistry, when the reactants (analogy of matter and anti-matter) have several paths leading to different products, the dominate product always have more stability, even if all other combinations of products appear in smaller amounts. Are we given too much weight to lab data and not enough weight to the preponderance of natural data? As an analogy, proteins can be synthesized in the lab and will appear as equal amounts of left and right helixes. In life, where protein concentrations of the earth are dominant, we only see left handed helixes. The protein will appear as equal and opposite in the lab; optical isomers, but a distinction forms in natural systems. Only left handed helixes are chosen because only there are chemically active; base stability to go further. Would it be valid to ignore the preponderance of the natural data and assume the lab data is the final standard in terms of proteins? Why do we do this with charge?
Anti-matter should have anti-mass, perhaps. If so, light cannot be anti-matter because photons can have mass. In fact .. photonic molecules have been created. http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/167439-mit-and-harvard-create-new-lightsaber-like-state-of-matter-photonic-molecules
Quote from: Alohascope on 02/02/2016 00:22:58Anti-matter should have anti-mass, perhaps. If so, light cannot be anti-matter because photons can have mass. In fact .. photonic molecules have been created. http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/167439-mit-and-harvard-create-new-lightsaber-like-state-of-matter-photonic-moleculesAn impossibility regardless what they say or think, positive and positive can not bond together they can only expand.
Quote from: Thebox on 02/02/2016 00:28:26Quote from: Alohascope on 02/02/2016 00:22:58Anti-matter should have anti-mass, perhaps. If so, light cannot be anti-matter because photons can have mass. In fact .. photonic molecules have been created. http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/167439-mit-and-harvard-create-new-lightsaber-like-state-of-matter-photonic-moleculesAn impossibility regardless what they say or think, positive and positive can not bond together they can only expand.Regardless of what you think you should at least read what they have to say.
Quote from: Alohascope on 02/02/2016 00:46:48Quote from: Thebox on 02/02/2016 00:28:26Quote from: Alohascope on 02/02/2016 00:22:58Anti-matter should have anti-mass, perhaps. If so, light cannot be anti-matter because photons can have mass. In fact .. photonic molecules have been created. http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/167439-mit-and-harvard-create-new-lightsaber-like-state-of-matter-photonic-moleculesAn impossibility regardless what they say or think, positive and positive can not bond together they can only expand.Regardless of what you think you should at least read what they have to say.I read enough . ''These photonic molecules have been theorized to exist'' this does not mean they exist.
Quote from: Thebox on 02/02/2016 07:41:06Quote from: Alohascope on 02/02/2016 00:46:48Quote from: Thebox on 02/02/2016 00:28:26Quote from: Alohascope on 02/02/2016 00:22:58Anti-matter should have anti-mass, perhaps. If so, light cannot be anti-matter because photons can have mass. In fact .. photonic molecules have been created. http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/167439-mit-and-harvard-create-new-lightsaber-like-state-of-matter-photonic-moleculesAn impossibility regardless what they say or think, positive and positive can not bond together they can only expand.Regardless of what you think you should at least read what they have to say.I read enough . ''These photonic molecules have been theorized to exist'' this does not mean they exist.The url says they DO exist .. created in a lab so probably also have a natural existence.