0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
english: "No offense, but it's obvious you're explaining your ideas using big words for concepts that are unclear to yourself."Reactants have nothing to do with capacitance, inductance, emittance, entropy, or mass. They are substances consumed in a chemical reaction.Light is, in the strictest sense, a stream of photons (a type of boson) moving within the visible wavelength of 400nm to 700nm.Light has nothing to do with communications protocols.The difference between parallel and serial communications channel has nothing to do with the number of electrical conductors. Serial communication channels simply operate on multiplexed data.Lastly, light does not keep anything in time. In fact, light itself is out of time if it's not measured in a vacuum. We measure things in terms of light because light is the fastest thing we know, and thus with we can assert the shortest distance and shortest time with it as a Planck length and Planck time.
Light is not a communications method. It can be used as a method of communication; but that's not just a property of light, you can do that with anything.For example, just the other day I was pondering mechanical computers and designed this simple mechanism for data storage using a spring, a ratchet, and a gear with a needle attached to it that pointed to 1 or 0. When the gear rotated counterclockwise, the ratchet would lock it in place and a write operation would occur that points the needle to 1. When the ratchet was released, the spring would reset the gear back to it's default position, and an erase operation would occur that points the needle to 0.Let's decide on a 2-bit encoding for communication. Here's a specification:00 - subtract 101 - add 110 - multiply by 211 - execute and reset to 0Now, let's make the device say "HELLO" (in ASCII encoding):0110101010101001010101010101011101101010101010010101010111011010101010010101010101101101101010101001010101010110110110101010100101010101011001010111
I repeat, light is not a communications medium, it can be used as a communications medium.
No, it's not. It's analogous to the statement, "guns don't kill people, people kill people with guns.". Take away the guns and they'll use knives. Take away the knives and they'll use sticks. Take away the sticks and they'll use fists. In any case, not the guns, nor the knives, nor the sticks, nor the fists have the intrinsic property of killing people.
Now see, if you had explained it like that to begin with instead of writing a novel filled with irrelevant and questionably incorrect statements, we wouldn't have been going around in circles.From what I can tell, what you're trying to explain has absolutely nothing to do with light or communication. I'm guessing that you're saying: - Light is a form of electromagnetic radiation. - Gravity interacts with electromagnetic radiation - Objects interact with electromagnetic radiationTherefore: - Electromagnetic radiation (a subset of which, being light) acts as a medium through which gravity and objects interact with each other.I'd say this is actually pretty logical.
And, now you're back to speaking complete grandiose nonsense... Anyhow, I understand your basic point now and accept that there is some logic to it.