0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Einstein’s special relativity is both valid and invalid. It was based upon the Michelson-Morley experiment, which was invalidated by the Earths gravitational field, which equalized the light speed in all directions. Since all the photonic corrections occurred before the photons entered the Earth’s surface, we had a constant speed of light Ce. Thus the basis of the experiment was destroyed before the photons reached the test instrument.
Quote from: jerrygg38Einsteins special relativity is both valid and invalid. It was based upon the Michelson-Morley experiment, which was invalidated by the Earths gravitational field, which equalized the light speed in all directions. Since all the photonic corrections occurred before the photons entered the Earths surface, we had a constant speed of light Ce. Thus the basis of the experiment was destroyed before the photons reached the test instrument.I think that Einstein claimed he used two postulates. From these he derived the Lorentz Transformations, which were already known. Einstein didn't mention the Morley experiment until a year or so later. These postulates were:(1) the speed of light is the same in all inertial frames of reference and (2) the physical laws of nature are the same in all inertial frames of reference.I'm trying to understand your dot waves. Can you elaborate. And do you think relativity phenomena is real? You seem to be intimating that it might not be.
Einsteins special relativity is both valid and invalid. It was based upon the Michelson-Morley experiment, which was invalidated by the Earths gravitational field, which equalized the light speed in all directions. Since all the photonic corrections occurred before the photons entered the Earths surface, we had a constant speed of light Ce. Thus the basis of the experiment was destroyed before the photons reached the test instrument.
Oh well perhaps in another hundred years or two hundred years people will understand that a photon coming from one part of the universe at C and another coming from an opposite direction at -C approach each other at 2C. Einstein made it C and this is ridiculous. I cannot understand how people can believe such things. Scientific brainwashing!!!! Einstein was just a good salesman. The sad thing is that we should have produced new energy source with unlimited power by now and we are still stuch with oil and coal. No doubt other planets in the universe are far ahead of us in their scientific knowledge. We need to catch up.
H. Ziegler: If one thinks about the basic particles of matter as invisible little spheres which possess an invariable speed of light, then all interactions of matter like states and electrodynamic phenomena can be described and thus we would have erected the bridge between the material and immaterial world that Mr. Planck wanted.
Quote from: jerrygg38; I do think that the Lorentz version does. The first unambiguous hypothesis for the causes of relativity phenomena that I have seen was H. Ziegler in Einstein's Development of Our Conception of theNature and Constitution of RadiationHere's the quote: Quote from: ZieglerH. Ziegler: If one thinks about the basic particles of matter as invisible little spheres which possess an invariable speed of light, then all interactions of matter like states and electrodynamic phenomena can be described and thus we would have erected the bridge between the material and immaterial world that Mr. Planck wanted.Basically Ziegler was saying that if the final irreducible constituent of all physical reality is the electromagnetic field relativity phenomena develops naturally in flat space-time. The reason is that the basic component of mass must constantly move at the invariant speed of light so mass must distort in order to move. All relativity phenomena happens because of these necessary distortions of matter according to Lorentz.What Ziegler said sounds interesting to me.I never heard of him. I have the material world of mass. And I have the electrical world of charge. The electrical world operates at light speed C. Thus it is massless. Does Ziegler mean that the immaterial world is massless? I will have to look him up. Where would I find his work?
; I do think that the Lorentz version does. The first unambiguous hypothesis for the causes of relativity phenomena that I have seen was H. Ziegler in Einstein's Development of Our Conception of theNature and Constitution of RadiationHere's the quote: Quote from: ZieglerH. Ziegler: If one thinks about the basic particles of matter as invisible little spheres which possess an invariable speed of light, then all interactions of matter like states and electrodynamic phenomena can be described and thus we would have erected the bridge between the material and immaterial world that Mr. Planck wanted.Basically Ziegler was saying that if the final irreducible constituent of all physical reality is the electromagnetic field relativity phenomena develops naturally in flat space-time. The reason is that the basic component of mass must constantly move at the invariant speed of light so mass must distort in order to move. All relativity phenomena happens because of these necessary distortions of matter according to Lorentz.
Quote from: Vern on 01/02/2009 18:24:17Quote from: jerrygg38; I do think that the Lorentz version does. The first unambiguous hypothesis for the causes of relativity phenomena that I have seen was H. Ziegler in Einstein's Development of Our Conception of theNature and Constitution of RadiationHere's the quote: Quote from: ZieglerH. Ziegler: If one thinks about the basic particles of matter as invisible little spheres which possess an invariable speed of light, then all interactions of matter like states and electrodynamic phenomena can be described and thus we would have erected the bridge between the material and immaterial world that Mr. Planck wanted.Basically Ziegler was saying that if the final irreducible constituent of all physical reality is the electromagnetic field relativity phenomena develops naturally in flat space-time. The reason is that the basic component of mass must constantly move at the invariant speed of light so mass must distort in order to move. All relativity phenomena happens because of these necessary distortions of matter according to Lorentz.What Ziegler said sounds interesting to me.I never heard of him. I have the material world of mass. And I have the electrical world of charge. The electrical world operates at light speed C. Thus it is massless. Does Ziegler mean that the immaterial world is massless? I will have to look him up. Where would I find his work?
Quote from: jerrygg38; I do think that the Lorentz version does. The first unambiguous hypothesis for the causes of relativity phenomena that I have seen was H. Ziegler in Einstein's Development of Our Conception of theNature and Constitution of RadiationHere's the quote: Quote from: ZieglerH. Ziegler: If one thinks about the basic particles of matter as invisible little spheres which possess an invariable speed of light, then all interactions of matter like states and electrodynamic phenomena can be described and thus we would have erected the bridge between the material and immaterial world that Mr. Planck wanted.Basically Ziegler was saying that if the final irreducible constituent of all physical reality is the electromagnetic field relativity phenomena develops naturally in flat space-time. The reason is that the basic component of mass must constantly move at the invariant speed of light so mass must distort in order to move. All relativity phenomena happens because of these necessary distortions of matter according to Lorentz.