0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: DonQuichotte on 10/11/2013 18:11:03Once again , you are confusing the image of the process with the cause of the process ,in relation to the old-new mind-body issue + emergent phenomena do occur only at the biological, material physical levels , and they cannot give rise to the mental or to the non-physical that's entirely different in its kind , not just in its genre , from its alleged biological original processes that did allegedly gave rise to it .You are making an assertion. Making an assertion is not evidence. RD specifically asked for evidence to support your refutation. Simply repeating your assertion does not constitute evidence. It is only an opinion, and a highly questionable opinion. Will you now provide evidence to support your assertion, or concede that what you are talking about is not science?
Once again , you are confusing the image of the process with the cause of the process ,in relation to the old-new mind-body issue + emergent phenomena do occur only at the biological, material physical levels , and they cannot give rise to the mental or to the non-physical that's entirely different in its kind , not just in its genre , from its alleged biological original processes that did allegedly gave rise to it .
So, in summary you believe that evidence means hand-waving, word salad, ambiguity and further unfounded assertions. I'll afford you one more opportunity to provide evidence. Here, this may help.Evidence is not a belief.Evidence is not a desire.Evidence is not an opinion.Evidence is not dogma.Evidence is not a suspicion.Evidence is not writings of undemonstrated provenance.Evidence is not a passionately declared statement.Evidence is not an idea.Evidence is not what someone told you in a pub.Evidence is not a You-Tube video.Evidence is not a majority opinion.Evidence is not a minority opinion. Evidence is measurable, repeatable observation consistent with a hypothesis. So what is your evidence? Remember, it must take heed of the above.