0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
jerrygg38,If you wanted to describe your own theories about aether, you should have opened your own thread.My Thread was at a point where posters would reply to my claim of how my aether model can account for Quantum Entanglement, which was where your description of a whole different model of the aether cut in. It's been called hijacking someone else's thread.
I don't consider my complaint to have been picayune. Quantum Entanglement (Q.E.) is a major mystery in Science.In 1935 Einstein took note of this effect and called it "spooky action at a distance." Because of it, he called into question the very foundations of quantum mechanics, an opinion he never really changed.Today, there is no theoretic model of any kind that accounts for Q.E. rationally and in detail, not in relativity theory, not in quantum mechanics, and up to now not ether theory either.My ether model presents a neat and concise explanation for Q.E. The idea is that Ether basically consists of a matrix of elemental ether units which, being elemental, are matching and uniform, and that these units are in a state of constant vibratory resonance with each other, as their outward vibrations form loose connections. Such resonances would be perfectly linear, and would be what would account for the build up of larger energic units, up to the observed quantum-scale units which make up our atomically-structured world.The ether-scale resonances occur between the elemental units themselves, and also include their resonances with the elemental "building blocks" that quantum units are made up of. In Q.E., the so-called "entangled" quantum units are, themselves, kinetically walled off, representing "cool arms" of a quiet, purring ether mechanism that can turn itself on and off, by itself, at any time.Again, I think this model merits serious, close, careful consideration
..............In 1925, another experiment was done, the Michelson-Gale-Pearson Experiment (MGPX), which was designed to investigate whether an "ether drag" effect could be measured. (This was intended to refine the MMX, which looked for a stationary ether, by seeing if a non-stationary ether, which is being "dragged" through space by the earth, could be shown to exist.) By the time of the MGPX in 1925, it was possible to measure the velocity of the rotation of Earth, and by also applying measurements of the Sagnac effect as another experimental refinement, it was believed that a drag-effect ether could be accurately tested for. (In the Sagnac effect, two separate light sources located on the equator of a rotating sphere are observed for any effect on the times of arrival of their light beams by the observer.) -The MGPX also showed a negative result, this time for a drag-effect ether...........................
In my Ether Model, the key error made by Michelson, Morley, and the others who used optical measurements to detect an ether, was that they had falsely assumed that any kind of ether would have to be acting as an energically- inert "carrying" medium for light (photon transmissions.) -Whereas, in my ether model, the ether acts via vibrational resonances between elemental ether units. (Although it does also happen to act as a physical "medium" through which larger units like photons pass, through transmission "channels.") The vibratory resonances also extend from the elemental ether units to the much-larger energy units such as quantum units and photons. (Although we observe light via the photons, resonating with quantum/atomic energy systems such as our eyes, and although these energy effects occur via other kinds of mechanisms involving vectors, and spin effects, there still remains a very fundamental major other energy process going on which is the vibratory resonances that the elemental ether units are exerting upon the photons. -The photons, like everything else in the world, are ultimately made up of the elemental ether units.) -This fundamental vibratory electrical effect is the "other" force acting upon light transmission that the nineteenth and early twentieth century optical experiments failed to include. So in my Ether Model, those experiments, which physics to this day rely on to dismiss the theory of an ether, were using a false assumption which invalidated their null results for the existence of an ether.
The basic idea of my ether model is that the ether is a universal matrix which acts via vibratory contact, or resonance, between a pair of elemental ether units, and between an elemental unit band a larger unit such as a photon. (This would be the most rational model to explain Quantum Entanglement, for example.)There would not be any direct correlation between the ether and the kinds of observations you cite, which arise from quantum energy systems, which operate via different dynamics, involving vectors and spin mechanisms. -Etheric forces are simple and act linearly. You can't observe their dynamics directly, because the ether is so rarified that we don't detect them directly by observation. Their effects can only be observed indirectly, such as by observing an etheric effect, such as levitation.
mad aetherist,Your and my models of an ether differ. -As an example, the way you referred to "waves," as a thing or property photons "have," differs from how waves are seen in my ether model.In my model, elemental ether units interact through vibratory resonance between themselves, or between elemental ether units and a larger unit such as a photon. Photons themselves act to transmit the light we visualize, via field, vector, spin, and such quantal energic mechanisms, familiar to quantum physics. However, in my model, again, there is what can be called a "cutoff" zone, where etheric-type vibratory energy transitions to the quantal type of energy. This "zone" is where a vast "sea" of etheric vibratory units gradually are transitioning to the quantal world of energic dynamics, where photons and other quantum units interact via their own (non-vibratory) mechanisms. This transition zone is viewed, in my model, as where what we see as "waves" represent a "shoreline" effect, where a sea of ether units are transitioning to quantal units.In my model, that ether world, of perfectly-linear vibrational energy, is not perceptible to us, because it is so rarified we can't detect it directly. -One observation might be mentioned that indirectly demonstrates how the more-fundamental ether form of energy does interact with our quantum/atomic world, would be Quantum Entanglement. -In my model, quantum entanglement represents radiated packets of etheric energy which have the same vibratory pattern. Elemental ether units are the only actual participants in this phenomenon, with the "entangled" quantum units being kinetically "walled off," like cool "arms" of a quiet, purring, universal, ether mechanism.I claim this is the only rational way to account for quantum entanglement.