0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Keep an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls out
I i where to suggest a theory i pet-created three years ago, concerning i very lamen terminology, will you laugh, joke, remain silent?
Quote from: FeynmanKeep an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls out
QuoteI i where to suggest a theory i pet-created three years ago, concerning i very lamen terminology, will you laugh, joke, remain silent?I like to see new hypothesises about nature and how it works. I look for the extent to which they rely upon magic for their outcome.For example, in the Big Bang, we have the magical inflation period and the magical expansion of nothingness. So I discount those because of their reliance upon magic.
The final authority must rest in the logical understanding of the mind, without such an understanding, the information we glean has no relationship or purpose relative to our existence, and in truth, borders on madness!
Regardless of your hypothesis, we would appreciate you gave your thread a relevant title.
My theory also answers that ''magical'' property vern, where whenever a particles polarized particles eigenstate is measured - ''why that up spin'', for arguements sake over the other solution? It's because it was when the electron tunnels at instantaneosity it reduced a fermi-dirac ghost particle in the vacuum, the two cancel out so the resulting observables (which in this case would be the incoming field \psi* from the past. This removes that ''why-question'' where some physicists thought it depended on some mental expectation.
where whenever a particles polarized particles eigenstate is measure
I have never felt a compelling need for virtual particles. To me they are like magic. We use them so we don't have to get to the real answer. When you take away all the magic you are left with Reality Theory. []BTW, you do know that you can open your Opening Paragraph and change the title, don't you?QuoteMy theory also answers that ''magical'' property vern, where whenever a particles polarized particles eigenstate is measured - ''why that up spin'', for arguements sake over the other solution? It's because it was when the electron tunnels at instantaneosity it reduced a fermi-dirac ghost particle in the vacuum, the two cancel out so the resulting observables (which in this case would be the incoming field \psi* from the past. This removes that ''why-question'' where some physicists thought it depended on some mental expectation.I have trouble understanding this. Quotewhere whenever a particles polarized particles eigenstate is measure I didn't quite get the meaning.
Quote from: Vern on 16/11/2009 18:17:24I have never felt a compelling need for virtual particles. To me they are like magic. We use them so we don't have to get to the real answer. When you take away all the magic you are left with Reality Theory. []BTW, you do know that you can open your Opening Paragraph and change the title, don't you?QuoteMy theory also answers that ''magical'' property vern, where whenever a particles polarized particles eigenstate is measured - ''why that up spin'', for arguements sake over the other solution? It's because it was when the electron tunnels at instantaneosity it reduced a fermi-dirac ghost particle in the vacuum, the two cancel out so the resulting observables (which in this case would be the incoming field \psi* from the past. This removes that ''why-question'' where some physicists thought it depended on some mental expectation.I have trouble understanding this. Quotewhere whenever a particles polarized particles eigenstate is measure I didn't quite get the meaning. Ok. Give us a moment, and i will edit with an exlnation
BTW, you do know that you can open your Opening Paragraph and change the title, don't you?How?
Okay; I understand what you're saying. I guess you're pretty well smitten with the notion of wave function collapse based upon observation. [] I can hypothesise that way but for experimental evidence that it might actually happen, I never find an instance where the observed states could not have existed before observation.I don't mean multiply existed, as in super imposed. I mean they could have existed in the observed states all the time since they were created.