The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side
New Theories
Why not design a hovercraft with rigid sides like a catamaran?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Why not design a hovercraft with rigid sides like a catamaran?
3 Replies
5414 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
CliffordK
(OP)
Naked Science Forum King!
6596
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 61 times
Site Moderator
Why not design a hovercraft with rigid sides like a catamaran?
«
on:
18/07/2011 04:45:32 »
It has been a few years since I've been to England. At that time, the train stopped in France, and started again in Dover, and there was a big gap between the two.
Anyway, I was thinking about shipping. Then about ground-effect craft. Then the hovercrafts.
I started wondering why not build a hovercraft so that it would be more or less sealed on the sides with a rigid hull, with a flexible hull on the front and back. Somewhat like a cross between a catamaran and a hovercraft.
You may or may not be able to drive it up onto a parking lot, but it would seem like you could gain efficiency in travel by eliminating the loss of air out the sides of the craft, and might not have a major loss of performance. The craft could still distribute weight on the cushion provided by the air. If designed right, it should be able to use air escaping out the back for thrust. Presumably it could be made with very low draft, or optimally could be dynamically configured for zero draft.
Logged
Geezer
Naked Science Forum King!
8314
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 8 times
"Vive la résistance!"
Why not design a hovercraft with rigid sides like a catamaran?
«
Reply #1 on:
18/07/2011 17:38:39 »
It must have been a while. The trains don't need to stop these days.
The primary advantage (or maybe the only advantage) of a hovercraft is that it can operate on water or land. I suspect a large amount of fuel is consumed just keeping the thing supported on air. If you want to build a water only craft that has a lot less drag, a hydrofoil might be a better option.
Logged
There ain'ta no sanity clause, and there ain'ta no centrifugal force æther.
namaan
Sr. Member
195
Activity:
0%
Why not design a hovercraft with rigid sides like a catamaran?
«
Reply #2 on:
18/07/2011 18:03:29 »
I'm not sure but it may simply be that the reality of driving the craft on land require something that won't break if its sides/bottom hits a hard surface. In fact I saw a small feature on it and how the inflatable panels on the largest hovercraft are removable in case one of them are ruptured.
Logged
Take it with a grain or two of salt...
CliffordK
(OP)
Naked Science Forum King!
6596
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 61 times
Site Moderator
Why not design a hovercraft with rigid sides like a catamaran?
«
Reply #3 on:
19/07/2011 06:36:08 »
I thought one of the reasons that the hovercraft was used in England was due to the speed and capacity as a ferry. The ability to drive up onto a parking lot would have been a bonus, but then it would have required special ports to be built. Are they able to dock over water?.
The military may use them as landing craft due to the ability to land on beaches, but I'm thinking of more civilian applications.
Anyway, I was thinking that one might be able to reduce drag by essentially floating a large ship on a bubble.
In a sense, a hydrofoil is similar by reducing hull area exposed to the water, or perhaps one could combine the concepts.
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...