0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
how can you believe NASA about anything.
Quote from: truthseeker67 on 15/09/2013 22:01:56By the way buddies Airplanes use less fuel at high altitude than they use at low altitude, because the air is thinner at high altitudes and therefore produces less air resistance to slow the airplane down thought i would explain that using my useless physics, so airplanes are more efficient at higher altitudes.So does a jet aircraft become most efficient in space where there is no air resistance at all?What about propeller driven planes? more efficient or less? What do you think is the main difference between rocket engines and jet engines?
By the way buddies Airplanes use less fuel at high altitude than they use at low altitude, because the air is thinner at high altitudes and therefore produces less air resistance to slow the airplane down thought i would explain that using my useless physics, so airplanes are more efficient at higher altitudes.
how can you believe NASA about anything. when a flag blows in a breeze on the moon and so many other things that are simply not correct, too many inconsistencies for my liking and a Luna module that looks like an activity scene made by primary school children and not to mention no blast crater from that all powerful rocket thrust,that didn't even leave dust on the feet of the lander how strange could that be.
I'm begining to feel like a school kid by arguing with him since that's the way he argues, don't you a bit?
He's got all the information he needs now; I suggest we leave him to it.
We went to the Moon to at the height of the cold war so the Russians were keeping a close eye on those rocket launches. The radio transmissions from the Moon to Earth could not have been faked. They had to be coming from the moon. Had we tried then the Russians would have pointed out to everyone in the world that the transmissions were not comming from the moon.He won't be able to explain that, that's for sure. And he won't even bother trying (since he never does).
Quote from: truthseeker67 on 15/09/2013 22:01:56By the way buddies Airplanes use less fuel at high altitude than they use at low altitude, because the air is thinner at high altitudes and therefore produces less air resistance to slow the airplane down thought i would explain that using my useless physics, so airplanes are more efficient at higher altitudes.So presumably a rocket-powered aircraft, which doesn't need air to burn its fuel, would became increasingly efficient as the air got thinner, until....oh bugger, this is leading towards common sense. Obviously all the world's airlines have got it wrong, or are being paid by NASA to fly at uneconomic altitudes in order to cover up the global conspiracy about space flight. The interesting thing is that not only the USA but Russia, the EU, China, India, Japan, and Korea are all part of the same conspiracy. Why? Because they recognise that Isaac Newton was the Antichrist.
Call me a sicko, but man I find these threads entertaining!Quote from: truthseeker67 on 15/09/2013 22:01:56By the way buddies Airplanes use less fuel at high altitude than they use at low altitude, because the air is thinner at high altitudes and therefore produces less air resistance to slow the airplane down thought i would explain that using my useless physics, so airplanes are more efficient at higher altitudes.If there's less air and therefore it is closer to being a vacuum, wouldn't the jets start to fail? After all, "thrust does not work in space". []I like the way that rockets need something to push against and therefore wont work in a vacuum, but when you push a large metal construction against something as solid and tangible as, oh, I don't know... air!, you can break the sound barrier several times over!I guess, truthseeker, that if you admitted to the truth, you'd have to change your username.
It turns out that truthseeker67 is really an economist
who claims that his hobby is cosmology.
This page might be of some interest: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Moon_landing_hoax#Evidence_for_a_conspiracy
It turns out that truthseeker67 is really an economist who claims that his hobby is cosmology. His site is here http://www.eioba.com/niebieskieucho/articles
truthseeker67 M'man. I love the doo!
I hope you're not on his side and believe that rocket's need air to push on? That's quite wrong. It makes no sense for the gases to know that they're going to push on air before they leave the combustion chamber and not reflect off of the interior walls and thus exchange the momentum of the gas with the momentum of the walls of the chamber? truthseeker67 is unable to grasp science or engineering, I hope you don't think the same way? It looks like you're joking but I wanted to make sure.
The experiment is demonstrated every time a rocket fires in space - which happens often. Satellites, probes, space labs - they all do it.
Even if he did understand Newtonian physics, he still asserts that high orbits and free flight are the products of conspiracy and fakery, not real engineering achievements. He is clearly deluded. Any proper scientist knows that astronauts are borne aloft by noble thoughts and good fairies. I just wish he could convince my flight examiners, who always demand a very mundane demonstration of classical physics.
Forgive me for not paying close attention (LOL!) but I haven't been following him in detail. Where did he make such claims?
Look have you ever asked yourself why all the satalites and space station included are all only in orbit, there is not one item of any sort further than orbit because they cant get there. they call something a space station but in fact it is not in true space it is still in the earths boundarys which we call orbit and guess what thrust works there and guess why?
Quote from: truthseeker67 on 04/09/2013 00:13:29Look have you ever asked yourself why all the satalites and space station included are all only in orbit, there is not one item of any sort further than orbit because they cant get there. they call something a space station but in fact it is not in true space it is still in the earths boundarys which we call orbit and guess what thrust works there and guess why? My bold