Naked Science Forum

General Discussion & Feedback => Just Chat! => Topic started by: blakestyger on 12/01/2009 09:00:29

Title: Which is better, hedge or bush?
Post by: blakestyger on 12/01/2009 09:00:29
This is what fallen hedge fund billionaire J Ezra Merkin could well be asking himself. According to today's Guardian he faces lawsuits to the tune of £66m for squandering investors' money in Bernard Madoff's Ponzi scheme.

Whatever happened to nominative determinism? Perhaps Merkin should have shunned hedges and stuck with bushes. [:I]
Title: Which is better, hedge or bush?
Post by: RD on 12/01/2009 09:57:01
Will Mr Merkin be up before Judge Judge (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_Igor_Judge) ? (sic).
Title: Which is better, hedge or bush?
Post by: Chemistry4me on 12/01/2009 10:19:31
RD: How do you do that thing where you have a link highlighted but it's not the actual name of the website? Like how you have 'Judge Judge' instead of the actualy website name http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sir_Igor_Judge
Title: Which is better, hedge or bush?
Post by: Karen W. on 12/01/2009 13:21:41
Very good question MIL!!

I have often  wondered  that myself !
Title: Which is better, hedge or bush?
Post by: DoctorBeaver on 12/01/2009 14:28:40
I'll use round brackets instead of square.

(url=whatever.com)PUT YOUR TEXT HERE(/url)

If you use the Quote facility on a reply that has that type of link then you can see it quite clearly.

(https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fbestsmileys.com%2Fdoh%2F2.gif&hash=fef6931e562a6dc5fd0fd29a97202c70) Now why didn't I think of that!
Title: Which is better, hedge or bush?
Post by: RD on 12/01/2009 19:51:50
I was attempting to riff from Blakestyger's reference to nominative determinism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominative_determinism#Examples):
people having surnames which match their job, e.g. Dr Brain the neurologist (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Brain).
 
Title: Which is better, hedge or bush?
Post by: Chemistry4me on 13/01/2009 02:11:50
Let me try:
Who likes cricket (http://www.cricinfo.com/)
Title: Which is better, hedge or bush?
Post by: Chemistry4me on 13/01/2009 02:16:02
Okay, thank you [;)], now I know! [:)] [:)]
Title: Which is better, hedge or bush?
Post by: Chemistry4me on 13/01/2009 02:22:05
How do you get that image onto the screen? Before you deleted your post? [:)]
Title: Which is better, hedge or bush?
Post by: RD on 13/01/2009 02:34:44
. [ Invalid Attachment ]


                It's a jpeg of a "screen grab" attached to the post.
Title: Which is better, hedge or bush?
Post by: Chemistry4me on 13/01/2009 03:19:12
Where is it? [???] I can't find it [???]
Title: Which is better, hedge or bush?
Post by: RD on 13/01/2009 04:01:39
You need something like "Snipping tool (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snipping_Tool)" or some other image capture programme which allows "frame grab" :
to copy what is on the screen.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screenshots
Title: Which is better, hedge or bush?
Post by: Chemistry4me on 13/01/2009 04:06:10
Like this:
 [ Invalid Attachment ]
Title: Which is better, hedge or bush?
Post by: Chemistry4me on 13/01/2009 04:07:04
Hey, alright, I've got it. Thank you! Any other cool tricks you know?
Title: Which is better, hedge or bush?
Post by: RD on 13/01/2009 04:08:40
You'll have to scale the width of the image to 900 (or less) so it doesn't run off the screen.

If you don't have an image manipulation programme there's a free one called GIMP (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GIMP) (it's a photoshop-type programme)

GIMP allows the creation of animation : here's one I made earlier ...

 [ Invalid Attachment ]


there goes my chance of a knighthood  [:)]
Title: Which is better, hedge or bush?
Post by: Chemistry4me on 13/01/2009 04:19:13
Why does it go fuzzy when I resize it?
 [ Invalid Attachment ]
Title: Which is better, hedge or bush?
Post by: Chemistry4me on 13/01/2009 04:20:17
GIMP allows the creation of animation
Hmm...very cool trick indeed!
Title: Which is better, hedge or bush?
Post by: RD on 13/01/2009 04:39:14
I meant scale the image width to 900 pixels, not resize the jpeg file.
Your resized (down sized) fuzzy image still runs off the screen: it is over 900 pixels wide.

BTW a jpeg of that size will have to be at least 30Kb to be readable (not fuzzy).

A programme like GIMP or similar photoshop-type programme will allow you to scale an image: change its dimensions in pixels, and change the size of the file it occupies: i.e. change the amount of memory it occupies, i.e. alter the amount of compression.

Your image is fuzzy because it is too compressed.