Naked Science Forum

On the Lighter Side => That CAN'T be true! => Topic started by: Atkhenaken on 11/09/2016 06:47:50

Title: Archaic ideas pre constant light speed theory.
Post by: Atkhenaken on 11/09/2016 06:47:50
The Hafele–Keating experiment clearly shows that there is an aether which causes the clocks to slow down or speed up due to aetheric pressure and wind and has nothing to do with Einsteins's relativity theory.

MOD EDIT: This is a new theory, please discuss in the appropriate part of the forum
Title: Re: Archaic ideas pre constant light speed theory.
Post by: Atkhenaken on 11/09/2016 12:11:20
I have reintroduced an OLD THEORY. I have not introduced a "NEW THEORY". Thus, the reason for moving my reply the the official 'site dungeon' is a non sequitur. The experiment clearly states that the both aircraft were travelling a exactly the same velocity. For relativity theory to be correct; it would require some time dilation to occur. But, for time dilation, you need one of the craft to be travelling faster than the other craft. This wasn't the case. Thus, relativity can't be used as the reason for the time difference. Thus, a spinning aether is the only other possible explanation. Note - You can't bury the truth that easily!
Title: Re: Archaic ideas pre constant light speed theory.
Post by: Colin2B on 11/09/2016 14:08:19
You can't bury the truth that easily!
You are the one trying to bury the truth.
Title: Re: Archaic ideas pre constant light speed theory.
Post by: Atkhenaken on 11/09/2016 14:30:40
My ideas can't be both archaic and new? Make up your mind which one first. Relativity can't be used to explain why there was a time difference in the two planes which went in two different directions. Relativity requires that one of the planes was flying faster than the other to justify Einstein's time dilation theory. But, the experiment clearly states that both planes traveled at the exact same speed. Thus, you will be forced to come up with some other explanation other than relativity. Note - There is no scientific proof of a space /time continuum either. Yet, I am sure you accept its existence.