0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
You could argue easily that they ocillate between the two values, attentively assorting their possible possitions until something collapses their wave functions. Could these oscillations be achieved when two points in spacetime are considered under the equations given?
I need to ask a question.Are you saying that they should be balanced or that they shouldn't be balanced in your hypothesis, because if it the first one, then equation:|(∫F_g vt)²_<A_k²>|=∫-▼²φ²(ћ(c/G))_g β²t²^(e^i ∫d^4 x(½[ξε_0(M²ψ-M²ψ]+½[ξε_g(M²ψ*-M²ψ*]) (1)is balanced, because it takes into respect the electromagnetic permittivity added with that of the gravitational permittivity with a Langrangian term for M². More interestingly enough, M²ψ is similar to the Klein-Gorden relationship. Here are some interesting reationships:M²ψ=-∂t(ψ)+ ▼²ψwhich results in plane wave solutions. By substitution, you can reconfigurate eq.(1) into:|(∫F_g vt)²_<A_k²>|=∫-▼²φ²(ћ(c/G))_g β²t²^(e^i ∫d^4 x(½[ξε_0(=-∂t(ψ)+ ▼²ψ-=-∂t(ψ)+ ▼²ψ]+½[ξε_g(=-∂t(ψ)+ ▼²ψ*-=-∂t(ψ)+ ▼²ψ])Which is very attractive as a wave equation. We could manipulate the equation even more to have nuetral components after taking ino account, from a Klein-Gorden relationship, where for manipulative convenience we can rewrite the plane wave solutions in quantized form as:|(∫F_g vt)²_<A_k²>|=∫-▼²φ²(ћ(c/G))_g β²t²^(e^i ∫d^4 x(½[ξε_0((∂²-M²)ψ*-(∂²-M²)]+½[ξε_g((∂²-M²)ψ*-(∂²-M²)ψ*])This is suppose, would cancel them out, or at least, this is my interpretation of the equation.
Vernyou require also a flat spacetime yes? - This part of relativity would need to be reformulated for photon movement:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricci-flat_manifoldWhere this math: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_manifold would be required, but i am not sure how to use that math in the link. I don't recognize the workings.
The points I refer to are the peak amplitude places in the sine curve that governs a photon's amplitude. A photon wave does not extend flat wise like a water wave. It moves as peaks, like a clown's hat. The area around the peaks drive the peaks through space. You can replace the words peaks with the word points of which I speak. When you consider that it is the surrounding fields that drive the points through space, and consider that interaction only happens in the path of peak amplitude, the slit experiments are all satisfied.
The Dirac Delta Function is a mathematical peak form
I suggest that when the straight line path of the photon is influenced by a gravitational field, it not only responds with a resultant charge, it takes on the property of mass. Mass and charge go hand in hand. Like the gyroscope, the photon wave resists a change in it's trajectory and when this wave is forced to deviate, it responds by taking on the character of mass with charge.
QuoteThe Dirac Delta Function is a mathematical peak formThanks, I did not know that.
I can visualize that. But my simplistic view is: why use an undiscovered magnetic monopole when nature screams out that it is a simple electromagnetic construct.