0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Consider a simple clock consisting of two mirrors A and B, between which a light pulse is bouncing. Speed of light constant & not additive, so when moving parallel relative to setup light pulse observed as tracing out a longer, angled path, the effect cannot be change in the consistent speed of light, therefore, according to relativity, must be accredited to effects on time (dilation).However when the relativists returned to earth & the stationary me was unexpectedly younger, it was found that I hadn't been stationary but travelling at speed of earths rotation + suns rotation + galaxies rotation etc. while they had just been travelling in a straight line.Or in other words; speed of light is not additive - including sideways - once it is emitted from its source it travels in a straight line, but is dispersed, a constant by which the movement of rest of universe can be measured.
I disagree that the complicated path travelled by earth can be calculated by people who do not know what dark matter, dark energy & dark flow are, let alone find gravitational waves.
Regarding straight lines - Light is energy liberated in one direction, 1 dimensional space.
My point was to even talk of stationary frame of reference is worthless, you only know of one constant, the speed of light in a vacuum, I am simply using it to also ascertain all other movement.I specifically mentioned Light as separate from the space that warps it & hence a constant that can be used to ascertain said warping. All experiments have shown is space can be warped, this takes energy, so for example, when a beam of light sent from a satellite to earth & the path is curved, the signal must either be sent earlier to account for longer curved path, or more energy used to fill the extra space of a curved path compared to a straight one.
My point was to even talk of stationary frame of reference is worthless,
you only know of one constant, the speed of light in a vacuum, I am simply using it to also ascertain all other movement.
I specifically mentioned Light as separate from the space that warps it & hence a constant that can be used to ascertain said warping.
when a beam of light sent from a satellite to earth & the path is curved, the signal must either be sent earlier to account for longer curved path,
Prove it.
Please tell me what experiment has confirmed the electromagnetic wave is given sideways additive momentum, as is proposed in the analogy of a spaceship flying off at nearly light speed & returning with a younger crew due to additive sideways momentum requiring the electromagnetic wave to have travelled a further distance than without the addition?
Posted by: A.J.Hodgson« on: Today at 17:33:08 »"Please tell me what experiment has confirmed the electromagnetic wave is given sideways additive momentum, as is proposed in the analogy of a spaceship flying off at nearly light speed & returning with a younger crew due to additive sideways momentum requiring the electromagnetic wave to have travelled a further distance than without the addition?"Atomic clocks of course. You are misunderstanding the basic premise of time dilation. It is time of reaction in different frames. Life being a biological clock is affected by that frames chemical reaction clock. Lets say the electron cycles. We will not argue about the path of the cycle but just that there is a cycle (distance). At the speed of light there is no energy left for cycling because all of the energy is used in inertial travel. Also this is also not a linear relationship. Half the speed of light the reaction time is 86.6% of the reaction speed at relative rest. 13.4% slower chemical reaction relative. At 86.6% of the speed of light the chemical reaction vs. being at rest is one half or 50% of the reaction speed relative to rest.Why is the reaction speed less? Because of the increased distance the electron has to travel per cycle with inertial speed. The amount of motion possible is c. Inertial speed reduces the potential cycle time at rest for the atom by increasing the relative distance through space the electron travels.The electron travel distance and the light travel distance is always relative to measure the speed of light the same in every frame.In GR space dilates by 13.4% to have an attraction of half the speed of light. When space dilates to 100% of the speed of light there is no energy left to keep atoms apart and a black hole forms void of the energy of time.In SR Inertial distance is relative to dilation of space caused by mass in GR. There is an equivalence but not equal in cause. While both are related to c. This is just what I suspect. Reality may or may not be different then this subjective interpretation.
That is frequency multiplied by distance-shortest wavelength
When distance added to c, frequency proves better constant for measurement of speed.