0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
We use an atomic clock to record the time of a car travelling around a race track, you are not measuring time with the timing device, you are recording an increment of your own time by using timing of the device to synchronise your own time, that is why there is no true time dilation.
The event of observing the car is not relative to your time, your time is dependent to solely you, your ''time dilation'' is dependent to you.
XYZ and you are the forth dimension as the observer at point 0. Time is not a dimension of space, time is dimensionless and dependent to all observers independent of each other. A random variable for all.
Time is an arbitrary creation by mankind to synchronise their everyday activities,
p.s I have decided that I am not mentally ill in any way, I am just correct on everything I have ever thought about and people fail to understand or are not smart enough to understand very simple concepts.
That's sheer arrogance. I thought you had a grasp on reality but I see now that's not true. Therefore I'm going back to ignoring you.
Time is dependent to each individual observer and time of each observers time is different to each others time.
The atomic clock on the ground is dependent to its own time, the atomic clock in the air is dependent to its own time, both times are independent having no effect on each other.
you are flying around the world you age less than an observer on the ground. Both times dependent but independent of each other
start with this Pete has shown in the Keating experiment. Evidence 1- each atomic clock is independent to other atomic clocks and dependent to its own measurement. The point is you are not measuring time with either timing device, you are recording an increment of your own time by using timing of the device to synchronise your own time, that is why there is no true time dilation. real time, space-time does not exist.
''time dilation'' is a synchronisation offset of the Caesium atom to the gravity mechanism. If you destroyed either atomic clock, the act of destroying and stopping the clocks completely will have no adverse effect on time, this I can assure you although I would not want to be in the vicinity of the atomic blast or else that would certainly destroy my ''time''.
Do you really think that if the beats of a caesium atom stopped completely that time would stand still?
QuoteDo you really think that if the beats of a caesium atom stopped completely that time would stand still?Yes
Quote from: GoC on 29/09/2015 22:36:08QuoteDo you really think that if the beats of a caesium atom stopped completely that time would stand still?YesI agree. It seems pretty obvious, although I think the tense is wrong "has already stood still" is more accurate. Although whether tense or sequence would still have any meaning is debatable. The problem is how would any of us know!
Of course that's quite wrong. For time to stop all motion, including all atomic clocks in the frame of reference in question, have to stop. One particular atomic clock stopping simply means that the clock is broken.
I do not think any of you are clear of what time is, space can only contain virtual time, there is no real time in space , time in space does not ''move''.The only time that exists is biological time and our very own biological clock count down or that of matter decay. All that is of materialistic values has a finite increment existence allowed in space. Only space has an infinite existence,
Quote from: Thebox on 30/09/2015 00:19:13I do not think any of you are clear of what time is, space can only contain virtual time, there is no real time in space , time in space does not ''move''.The only time that exists is biological time and our very own biological clock count down or that of matter decay. All that is of materialistic values has a finite increment existence allowed in space. Only space has an infinite existence,So you are saying if there is nothing then the nothing doesnt experience time? well obviously.. what is the point of say 0kg at 0m/s with 0J experiences time.. it has nothing to measure time in or for.. But time is not linked biologically, chemically, atomically, mechanically.. it just is.. and it always goes forwards.. to home time! bah but theres always work the next day! maybe I should become nothing and enjoy the timelessness..
So you are saying if there is nothing then the nothing doesnt experience time? well obviously.. what is the point of say 0kg at 0m/s with 0J experiences time.. it has nothing to measure time in or for.. But time is not linked biologically, chemically, atomically, mechanically.. it just is.. and it always goes forwards.. to home time! bah but theres always work the next day! maybe I should become nothing and enjoy the timelessness..