0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Only the moderators can give you a definitive answer, but might be worth looking here for a clue newbielink:http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=8535.0 [nonactive]Threads which are just abusive, cross the legal boundaries, etc would be deleted.
The scientific method involves:1. looking at the evidence surrounding an unexplained phenomena.2. coming up with a proposed explanation for that phenomena.3. performing experiments or gathering more evidence relating to the phenomena.4. if the evidence cannot be explained by the explanation this proves the explanation is false. The explanation must either be modified to accommodate the anomaly or rejected. goto 2.5. if the evidence fits the explanation it provides more support for the explanation. goto 3.The majority of scientists reject this simple and extremely effective method. Proving that most scientists are actually science-illiterate frauds.There is a phenomena where the prevailing explanation has absolutely no evidence whatsoever. Much evidence exists that cannot be accommodated by the prevailing explanation. An alternate explanation can accommodate all the evidence but these "scientists" reject this explanation on faith alone.
Proving that most scientists are actually science-illiterate frauds.
I had posted a question and that entire discussion was deleted with no reason. Why? The question was: "Why do so many scientists reject the scientific method?".
Quote from: Colin2B on 29/05/2015 18:11:07Only the moderators can give you a definitive answer, but might be worth looking here for a clue http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=8535.0Threads which are just abusive, cross the legal boundaries, etc would be deleted.It says posts which contravene the rules can be deleted, not entire discussions. Obviously this was retaliation for exposing the scientific fraud that mainstream "science" engages in. Here is my first post, how is it abusive or cross any legal boundaries or in any way contravene the rules:QuoteThe scientific method involves:1. looking at the evidence surrounding an unexplained phenomena.2. coming up with a proposed explanation for that phenomena.3. performing experiments or gathering more evidence relating to the phenomena.4. if the evidence cannot be explained by the explanation this proves the explanation is false. The explanation must either be modified to accommodate the anomaly or rejected. goto 2.5. if the evidence fits the explanation it provides more support for the explanation. goto 3.The majority of scientists reject this simple and extremely effective method. Proving that most scientists are actually science-illiterate frauds.There is a phenomena where the prevailing explanation has absolutely no evidence whatsoever. Much evidence exists that cannot be accommodated by the prevailing explanation. An alternate explanation can accommodate all the evidence but these "scientists" reject this explanation on faith alone.
Only the moderators can give you a definitive answer, but might be worth looking here for a clue http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=8535.0Threads which are just abusive, cross the legal boundaries, etc would be deleted.
Can I be weeded out of the system? How do you know my pet doesn't have theories? Ha, sheesh, what the heck is a null hypothesis anyway, who needs em. Does a majority count as more than 50% or are there more variables then scientist, non scientist?Anyone for tea?
Well I wondered how long it would take before I encountered yourself in a thread.
And excuse me for saying but, as this is a thread then how would I make the last post?
PmbPhy, I find this debate counter productive and illogical and I also feel you are posing somewhat rhetorical questions.
Can I be weeded out of the system?...
PmbPhy, I find this debate counter productive and illogical