The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side
New Theories
Architect Theory
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Architect Theory
0 Replies
3010 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Steelycascade95
(OP)
Jr. Member
11
Activity:
0%
Architect Theory
«
on:
02/01/2013 14:48:26 »
This is a continued version of CORS. If there are multiple universi, and if CORS is correct, than it would truly solve the Hawking Paradox. It would prove once and for all that Hawking Radiation does not exist. It can't exist for several reasons, in particular the black hole would suck any radiation back into itself. The radiation would not even get past the event horizon. If you read CORS before you come here, and you try to draw a diagram of it, you'll notice the shape of the diagram is similar to the design of a high rise. The black/white holes act as wormholes connecting the universi to each other. It would bend the fabric of space slightly coopertively with each hole. If there are multiple universi, they can be connected by these holes. The bending of the fabric could be pulling apart our current universe. But there is no cause for alarm. I estimate it would take unbeleivable amounts of energy to do so entirely. And if I'm right, than black/white holes have limited lifetimes. I don't know how long, but physics dictate that in such a scenario the hole's "string" would collapse eventually sealing off the hole.
Sorry if this isn't worded well, not quite the best speaker.
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...