0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
that's your way of science, no my way.
anyone agree with you?
please be friendly.
you guys say calculate and then logic will follow.calculate what?
Pete, is light gravitation wave produced by exited atom?is light photon particle/wave emitted by electron?what's your opinion? Thanks.
Pete, if there is a clear logic, why can't you simply state it? what's the secret?
anyway, this thread is about light.
is light gravitation wave produced by exited atom?
is light photon particle/wave emitted by electron?
Quote from: chiralSPO on 27/04/2015 03:01:15If I may speak for Pete, the problem is that QM is fairly straight forward for someone who can do multivariate differential and integral calculus and simple differential equations (though it still takes a lot of effort to make sure it all makes sense), and nearly impossible to "prove" anything to someone who lacks those tools.The "logic" of quantum mechanics is totally at odds with what we observe in the macroscopic world, but totally in line with (fairly) simple mathematical equations.It may have been Feynman who said "shut up and calculate" (though some attribute it to Mermin)i am not seeking the prove of the equations. i want to learn the logic to make those equations.how many equations to support the big bang theory? is the big bang theory correct?maybe, tomorrow, big bang will become flat earth. maybe not.are you sure there is orbital? are you sure there is photon and graviton? based on what fact? isn't we all science lovers and good thinkers? can we help each other to uncover truth/science instead of compete known knowledge?
If I may speak for Pete, the problem is that QM is fairly straight forward for someone who can do multivariate differential and integral calculus and simple differential equations (though it still takes a lot of effort to make sure it all makes sense), and nearly impossible to "prove" anything to someone who lacks those tools.The "logic" of quantum mechanics is totally at odds with what we observe in the macroscopic world, but totally in line with (fairly) simple mathematical equations.It may have been Feynman who said "shut up and calculate" (though some attribute it to Mermin)
Dear Brother,are you sure about this?they got laser guns and we got rusty swords, they are many, we are 1*1=0.
i am not seeking the prove of the equations. i want to learn the logic to make those equations.
Inductive reasoning (as opposed to deductive reasoning or abductive reasoning) is reasoning in which the premises seek to supply strong evidence for (not absolute proof of) the truth of the conclusion. While the conclusion of a deductive argument is certain, the truth of the conclusion of an inductive argument is probable, based upon the evidence given.
1 electron * 1 proton = 0 charge.he'll agree.
i call them proton, electron and enertron. no one openly agree with me yet.
Quote from: jccc on 28/04/2015 18:06:52i call them proton, electron and enertron. no one openly agree with me yet. because you are wrong, selfdeluded, muddleheaded and arrogant beyond belief. Where is your experimental proof?
An atoms force field does not end at atom radius, but extend to infinity. In whole, an atom or planet maybe electrically neutral, but Every charge within has its own force field beyond distance, those forces overlapped to produce chemical bonding, magnetism and gravity.
Ever wonder why is Fe=q1q2/r^2, Fg=m1m2/r^2, and mass proportional to proton numbers within it?
there is only 1 force in nature, the force between charges. without charge, there is no matter, no force, nothing will ever happen.
gravity is net electrostatic forces between all charges within matter. or between matters. in contact, it acts as chemical bounding, in distance, it acts as gravity. i explained earlier in this thread.