Naked Science Forum
General Science => General Science => Topic started by: thedoc on 29/11/2011 15:11:11
-
Changhuei Yang explains his design for a lensless microscope...
Read a transcript of the interview by clicking here (http://www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/content/interviews/interview/1877/)
or
-
Interesting.
Interpolated resolution by moving the light source.
What about a time delay? Lots of pixels would be an advantage, & great for looking at static stained slides.
However, if it takes... say 5 seconds to take an image, then it would be difficult to get a good image of living tissue like one gets when looking at a drop of pond water.
They also don't really list the interpolated resolution.
The average eukaryote cell may be 10 microns, so 4 microns would allow it to be visualized, but with limited detail.
The average prokaryote cell is about 2 microns... so that would give you about 4 cells per pixel. Not too good.
Of course, technology will improve over time.
A traditional light microscope is limited to about 0.2 microns, or about 1/20th of the non interpolated lensless microscope above, but some techniques push them down into the nanometer range.
Perhaps there is a way to merge some of the technologies.
-
Any scanner that examines an image thru a small aperture can be regarded as a lensless microsope, with a sufficiently bright light source and a small enough aperture resolution of less than the wavelength of the light used can be achieved.
An early use was the Farnsworth image dissector used by J L Baird in his early 240 line TV transmissions from Alexander Palace.