0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Variola on 12/08/2010 16:59:16Quote I'm just here to say bo---locks to that! Well, thanks for that. Say that alot I assume.
Quote I'm just here to say bo---locks to that! Well, thanks for that.
I'm just here to say bo---locks to that!
Quote from: Geezer on 12/08/2010 19:33:27I think it's all a load of old rowlocks.There is no such thing as "neagative freedom". Freedom can only have a positive value. Seems to me these socialist scientist types need to crack the old math books a bit more.A freedom to kill, surely would have a negative value.I was wondering actuallyAgent four: denial; There is no negative freedom.Agent five: Anger; It all rubbish- shut up!Agent six; barganing; Please stop posting about this havent we been through it all!Agent seven: Exceptance; Look just except it, its the way it is!
I think it's all a load of old rowlocks.There is no such thing as "neagative freedom". Freedom can only have a positive value. Seems to me these socialist scientist types need to crack the old math books a bit more.
Ok here I go!!!!If you put reality TV on and don't vote and remain ignorant of your rights and that you have a voice, then you have negative freedom. The present Government in Britain loves us to do all this but it is up to us to educate our children and make sure they have a voice.
Quote from: Littlestone on 12/08/2010 21:23:19Quote from: Geezer on 12/08/2010 19:33:27I think it's all a load of old rowlocks.There is no such thing as "neagative freedom". Freedom can only have a positive value. Seems to me these socialist scientist types need to crack the old math books a bit more.A freedom to kill, surely would have a negative value.Freedom ranges from total freedom (totally unconstrained) to almost no freedom.How can it be negative?
Quote from: Geezer on 12/08/2010 19:33:27I think it's all a load of old rowlocks.There is no such thing as "neagative freedom". Freedom can only have a positive value. Seems to me these socialist scientist types need to crack the old math books a bit more.A freedom to kill, surely would have a negative value.
Quote from: Littlestone on 12/08/2010 20:50:00Quote from: Variola on 12/08/2010 16:59:16Quote I'm just here to say bo---locks to that! Well, thanks for that. Say that alot I assume.Only when utterly bored of a conversation.
Quote from: Littlestone on 12/08/2010 21:23:19Quote from: Geezer on 12/08/2010 19:33:27I think it's all a load of old rowlocks.There is no such thing as "neagative freedom". Freedom can only have a positive value. Seems to me these socialist scientist types need to crack the old math books a bit more.A freedom to kill, surely would have a negative value.I was wondering actuallyAgent four: denial; There is no negative freedom.Agent five: Anger; It all rubbish- shut up!Agent six; barganing; Please stop posting about this havent we been through it all!Agent seven: Exceptance; Look just except it, its the way it is!Anarchist:1 Hey I have read this stuff and made a strawman argument against 'The System'. I am going to post it up all over the internet and when people challenge my view I will resort to more tripe to try and cover up my inadequate statements.
Quote from: Variola on 12/08/2010 22:22:56Quote from: Littlestone on 12/08/2010 20:50:00Quote from: Variola on 12/08/2010 16:59:16Quote I'm just here to say bo---locks to that! Well, thanks for that. Say that alot I assume.Only when utterly bored of a conversation. Cute- tired of trying to convince someone its ok to do such and such...
Will say here actually that its the agents that hold a lot of blame!WHY? because if this world had men in it, then when the pig said "go screw this person" the man would reply NO! Probably No pig! As always the lack of men, and the sad existence of spineless little cowards ruins it for everyone....