Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side => New Theories => Topic started by: Steven Verstoep on 02/04/2016 10:35:48
-
Hello world,
I have long believed that Everything is Information. I could never make any scientific statements about it, but recently I found some relations that give results in line with other physical theories. Please review my thoughts and express your criticism about the philosophy.
Main ideas:
Electron is a qubit (spin particle)
All the other (fermionic) elementary particles are partial qubits (partial spin particles).
--More coming!--
Basically you can calculate the charge of a particle with the following formula:
Charge = "The Number of available states” minus ”The Number of occupied states”
So electrons have 1 occupied state, but 0 available states, so their charge is -1. The occupied state represents a full qubit. All other particles are fractions of a qubit, forming their charges naturally. A neutrino for example has 0.5 occupied state and 0.5 available state, giving it a neutral charge.
Ok, the ideas are on an external website, which I cannot link to (new member). maybe type it in your browser? definitionof dot info?
The website is being set-up. Use the pdf-download to read the preview nicely formatted.
Cheers!
Revaro
-
Since 04-04 it is now fully online (PDF-download).
4 Pillars of the theory:
- elementary particles are qubits. Spin and charge are quantum numbers that can be transformed to represent qubits.
- Space is the inverse of entanglement. Just as spin and the superposition, entanglement can be fractional. This leads to a notion of distance.
- To be means to change. From this it is concluded that time is a random process. Just like the inherent uncertainty in quantum mechanics.
- The 3 pillars above form the 4th pillar: Spin waves emerge when qubits start interacting. Spin waves travel at the speed of light. However the mathematics of the wave differential equation ignore the displacement wave. When in classical mechanics this is included, the Schrödinger equation is obtained and the wave mechanics suggest that relativistic corrections need to be applied for velocities near the speed of light.
An intro movie is now on youtube:
www. definitionof.info
-
Information requires context; without context, information is noise: only noise can carry information & it can only *carry* information.
-
Information requires context; without context, information is noise: only noise can carry information & it can only *carry* information.
The context is also information. There is only 1 thing I know of that can exist without information and that is logic. The concept of noise and order only have a meaning for an (intelligent) observer. They have no inherent meaning (they are the same).
-
Since spin waves travel only at the speed of light , how do you account for the faster than light expansion of the Universe, that is now being claimed by some astronomers ? How did the Universe evolve if these were the restrictions ?
-
Since spin waves travel only at the speed of light , how do you account for the faster than light expansion of the Universe, that is now being claimed by some astronomers ? How did the Universe evolve if these were the restrictions ?
I can only speculate about that. But it is not a restriction (as how you call it) in my model. It is the same as the entanglement of photons. That interaction is instantaneous regardless of distance. In any entanglement model faster than light effects and expansions are possible.
One shortcoming of the current physics is that space is taken as a postulate. Once you use space as a structure in itself as well, Hyperexpansion and Hubble expansion are no longer impossible.
About the first moments of the Universe I can only speculate (where people even debate if it happened at all, but assuming there was a big bang), I foresee it as a highly incoherent structure. It would be filled with worm holes and D-tours. depending on the path you choose, two points would be light-years apart or just next to each other. So speaking about Expansion, in itself, is asking the wrong question. Expansion has no meaning in the initial moments of the Universe.
-
Information requires context; without context, information is noise: only noise can carry information & it can only *carry* information.
The context is also information.
Unarticulated; accumulated & structured: not noise.
There is only 1 thing I know of that can exist without information and that is logic.
If you mean coherence, i can agree.
The concept of noise and order only have a meaning for an (intelligent) observer. They have no inherent meaning (they are the same).
The observer is real; information in the absence of an observer is not. "Intelligence" is a judgement call & not relevant. Maybe "entropy" is more relevant? Ever think that meaning is entangling?