The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
On the Lighter Side
New Theories
The Basis for 78 Binary Laws of Physics
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
The Basis for 78 Binary Laws of Physics
1 Replies
3007 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
NCoppedge
(OP)
First timers
7
Activity:
0%
The Basis for 78 Binary Laws of Physics
«
on:
19/09/2013 17:33:56 »
Recently I wrote on my blog describing the foundation for 78 Binary Laws of Physics.
The perspective is based on a categorical 'variablist' approach, in which variables and other entities are described in terms of coherent qualities, e.g. if two words are taken to suffice for a definition of a variable, then those two words are the exclusive properties of that entity.
When two words are not seen to exclusive, even when the definition seems adequate, then it must be concluded that the definition is incomplete. By incrementing this process, I found, through inspiration, twelve definitions that I feel suffice in the near-to-long-term about twelve variables.
The binary variables of the variables are then compared in a [AB:CD and AD:BC] method called categorical-deductive quadra, yielding in this case 12! laws, for 12 defined variables.
Here is the link to the Basis for the 78 Binary Laws, consisting of 12 binary variable definitions: newbielink:http://www.hypercubics.blogspot.com/2013/09/i-have-hints-of-new-physics-principles.html
[nonactive]
.
Please comment below.
By the way, the definitions are based on an article in the New York Times, about Einstein and black holes, which described that physics may be at its limit of describing black holes in quantum terms, if there is a 'firewall paradox', e.g. that universes could differ because of a boundary between universes which we do not yet understand. My principles are meant to provide a contrarian, long-term perspective for developing new theorems of physics, in the context of coherency, combinatorics, and relativity and quantum mechanics. Maybe it's just a sample of an idea, but at least I've gone to some length to define the variables in an exclusive way. That is it's genius, if it has a genius.
Logged
alancalverd
Global Moderator
Naked Science Forum GOD!
18467
Activity:
62.5%
Thanked: 1563 times
life is too short to drink instant coffee
Re: The Basis for 78 Binary Laws of Physics
«
Reply #1 on:
20/09/2013 17:42:31 »
Quote
Mass is always definite and infinite
It is unusual to combine two untrue statements into a selfcontradiction.
The experimental evidence would be most interesting.
Logged
helping to stem the tide of ignorance
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...