0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
At least some matter has no spin.
The universe is a simple place
Quote from: Atkhenaken on 30/08/2016 15:26:10The universe is a simple place If that were true, why are so many credible physicists still struggling to understand it's complexities? Frankly, after scrutinizing your explanation, the only thing I see spinning are the heads of those credible physicists.
Quote from: Ethos_ on 01/09/2016 04:34:41Quote from: Atkhenaken on 30/08/2016 15:26:10The universe is a simple place If that were true, why are so many credible physicists still struggling to understand it's complexities? Frankly, after scrutinizing your explanation, the only thing I see spinning are the heads of those credible physicists.Most physicists don't want the universe to be simple because you can't make a living out of explaining how a simple universe works because it is simple. On the other hand, a complex universe with hundreds of sub-atomic particles is a far more attractive a proposition, with lots of complications and lots of explaining to do and research grants in finding out how these particles behave.
..... what you need is the evidence in support of this "simple" theory.
Quote from: Ethos_ on 01/09/2016 13:30:11..... what you need is the evidence in support of this "simple" theory. You have offered conjecture that this single particle exists in the forms you describe. To have your ideas taken seriously you will need details of experiments you have performed and show how the results support your ideas. There is a lot of advice on the net regarding methodology and examples from the work of Faraday, Newton, Galileo etc.Good luck in your venture.
My theory is based on logic and observation.
Quote from: Atkhenaken on 01/09/2016 17:48:21My theory is based on logic and observation. Really?Shaver plugs have 2 pins, 3 phase plugs have 4for a sphere I can think of at least 9 movements, not counting movement through spaceDon't understand the cogs bit, that's only 2 directions!
Quote from: Colin2B on 01/09/2016 23:05:28Quote from: Atkhenaken on 01/09/2016 17:48:21My theory is based on logic and observation. Really?Shaver plugs have 2 pins, 3 phase plugs have 4for a sphere I can think of at least 9 movements, not counting movement through spaceDon't understand the cogs bit, that's only 2 directions!My theory requires a little common sense.
My theory requires a little common sense.
I would say yes. I put your view into a mechanical form of relativity where the observations of Relativity fit the mechanics described. I suspect this is possibly what you meant as a common sense approach. But I would not want to speak for your interpretation without knowing your full understanding. Mechanical Relativity in new theories.
Quote from: GoC on 02/09/2016 16:09:18I would say yes. I put your view into a mechanical form of relativity where the observations of Relativity fit the mechanics described. I suspect this is possibly what you meant as a common sense approach. But I would not want to speak for your interpretation without knowing your full understanding. Mechanical Relativity in new theories.The concept of time changing with speed is illogical. I can't accept relativity in this case. It would be more logical for the measuring clocks to change but not for time itself to change. Thus, relativity is just a measurement of aetheric compression due to speed. Note - Its the compression that causes the clocks to slow down. This is another aspect of my theory which does away with all magical forces and fields and replaces it with mechanical actions. Thus, the universe has no fields or forces but only has mechanical actions. This is the Simple Universe Theory.
I honestly don't know why I bother sometimes. There is a wall to my immediate left that I could easily bang my head against.