The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
General Discussion & Feedback
Radio Show & Podcast Feedback
Has male sperm count fallen since 1950?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Has male sperm count fallen since 1950?
2 Replies
2715 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
thedoc
(OP)
Forum Admin
Moderator
Hero Member
510
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 21 times
Has male sperm count fallen since 1950?
«
on:
19/04/2016 15:18:56 »
tim asked the Naked Scientists:
I once read that the male sperm count has fallen a lot since 1950. The reason was then not known. That was 15 yrs ago. Perhaps it was pesticides some thought. Do we know any more now?
What do you think?
«
Last Edit: 19/04/2016 15:18:56 by _system
»
Logged
thedoc
(OP)
Forum Admin
Moderator
Hero Member
510
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 21 times
Hear the answer to this question on our show
«
Reply #1 on:
19/04/2016 17:21:21 »
We discussed this question on our show
Kat Arney put this question to Dr Chris Smith...
Kat - Chris Smith, you’re a medical doctor. How much has the sperm count been declined by since the 1950s? And do we know why?
Chris - This story originates from a study by the Danes in the early 90’s and they compared sperm counts collected around the time of the Second World War with contemporary sperm counts, and they reckoned there had been a 50% decline in the samples they were looking at.
A subsequent French study, coming about a decade later, suggested that not quite 50% but there was a similar big reduction in sperm counts. Some studies in Italy bucked the trend and they didn’t find any decrease in their population but then the Italians, they like to be a little bit different don’t they, the Italians. So, on average, we think there might be something in this.
Also, if we look in the animal world, we see that there are reports of fish in waterways being exposed to human hormones and also other chemicals changing sex and we can see male fish developing female sexual characteristics. We’ve also got studies of shellfish on beaches, which have been exposed to sewage outflows and you see some of these shellfish developing some other evidence of being sort of transgender.
Now this appears to be because of exposure to various hormones and things. The evidence for that is that, between about the 1950s and the 1970s, there was a trend to give women after they had babies or while they were pregnant a chemical called diethylbestrol (DES). This was a synthetic form of oestrogen and it was done to do various things, including reduce the amount of milk that the breasts made to avoid mammary engorgement which could be uncomfortable. But when those women had children grew up and they looked at those children, some of those children had genital abnormalities, if they were boys. And this suggested that if you were exposed as a boy during development to oestrogen or oestrogenic-like chemicals, it can have consequences for your fertility.
So, what the scientists are speculating is that we don’t know why, but there may well be sources of oestrogen-like chemicals coming at us from the environment. Tests on drinking water don’t show the levels are very high in Britain - that’s not necessarily true in other countries. But certainly food, because of the exposure to animals to the environment they live in, the packaging of food - plastic is in lots and lots of packaging and plastics do release chemicals that can have molecules in them that look like the oestrogen molecule, and they can bind onto the receptor that oestrogen would stimulate - that could well be having this effect.
So the jury is out. We think that the effect and the observed effect is real. We don’t know the chemical reason exactly, but we suspect some kind of environmental exposure that everyone is succumbing to because we are living in this world where these plastics are ubiquitous.
Kat - Have we still got Tim on the line. Does that answer your question Tim?
Tim - Yes. Fascinating, yes. I shall go and make sure that my cheese is packed very carefully in the fridge.
Kat - I think the safest thing to do is just eat it all. That would be my scientific advice. Thank you very much for calling in.
Tim - Okay. It was very interesting. Thanks, bye.
Click to visit the show page for the
podcast in which this question is answered.
Alternatively, [chapter podcast=1001336 track=16.04.19/Naked_Scientists_Show_16.04.19_1005013.mp3]
listen to the answer now[/chapter] or
[download as MP3]
«
Last Edit: 01/01/1970 01:00:00 by _system
»
Logged
Prasad S
Guest
None
«
Reply #2 on:
02/05/2016 09:51:15 »
Listened to this and now I am sh.. scared for people in the third world who not only still might be using DES, but using all sort cheap plastic as a fashion statement and convenience😂
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...