The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
General Discussion & Feedback
Just Chat!
Not another UFO?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Not another UFO?
3 Replies
2890 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Don_1
(OP)
Naked Science Forum King!
6889
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 15 times
A stupid comment for every occasion.
Not another UFO?
«
on:
10/04/2012 17:36:14 »
Take a look here:
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/ufo-video-seoul-south-korea.html
Looks a bit like flying hat to me.
«
Last Edit: 10/04/2012 17:39:21 by Don_1
»
Logged
If brains were made of dynamite, I wouldn't have enough to blow my nose.
RD
Naked Science Forum GOD!
9094
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 163 times
Re: Not another UFO?
«
Reply #1 on:
10/04/2012 17:51:54 »
A flying hat which goes see-through @ 0:22 ...
[ Invalid Attachment ]
Logged
CliffordK
Naked Science Forum King!
6596
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 61 times
Site Moderator
Re: Not another UFO?
«
Reply #2 on:
10/04/2012 22:13:22 »
It looks like an inverted ceramic bowl.
Your see-through bowl is likely a compression artifact.
If we assume the film was intentionally made to follow the "UFO", then why isn't the UFO centered at the beginning of the film?
Later in the film, the photographer seems to zoom in on the object just before the object departs to the top left. Yet, there is no attempt to search for the UFO in the direction it disappeared.
Logged
RD
Naked Science Forum GOD!
9094
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 163 times
Re: Not another UFO?
«
Reply #3 on:
11/04/2012 11:54:07 »
Image persistence, rather than compression artifact, can cause a double-exposure see-through effect.
http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=25113.msg271320#msg271320
However if there was a persistence problem the landscape would be smeared by the camera movement,
and the image of the UFO (if a real moving object) would leave a trail.
«
Last Edit: 11/04/2012 11:55:47 by RD
»
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...