Naked Science Forum

Non Life Sciences => Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology => Topic started by: tsolkas-1 on 07/07/2006 09:34:26

Title: THE GREAT ERROR OF EINSTEIN (The proof)
Post by: tsolkas-1 on 07/07/2006 09:34:26
“Equivalence Principle” of  the General Theory of Relativity, is absolutely wrong!

more.....http://www.tsolkas.gr/english/document1/principle-equivalence/principle-equivalence.html

Christos  A  . Tsolkas

1234
Title: Re: THE GREAT ERROR OF EINSTEIN (The proof)
Post by: neilep on 07/07/2006 14:41:44
This is nice....but I'd like the academia here to tell me if it should remain here or be moved to the new theory section..

Ta !!!

Men are the same as women, just inside out !
Title: Re: THE GREAT ERROR OF EINSTEIN (The proof)
Post by: tony6789 on 07/07/2006 19:50:34
quote:
Originally posted by neilep


Ta !!!

Men are the same as women, just inside out !

DA!!!!

NEVER! underestimate youth
Title: Re: THE GREAT ERROR OF EINSTEIN (The proof)
Post by: thebrain13 on 07/07/2006 21:45:01
I hate math, what does that mean, and where is the experimental data that proves the equivalence principle erroneous.
Title: Re: THE GREAT ERROR OF EINSTEIN (The proof)
Post by: DocN on 07/07/2006 22:00:31
Experimental data still seems to back Einstein.
Title: Re: THE GREAT ERROR OF EINSTEIN (The proof)
Post by: daveshorts on 08/07/2006 00:41:50
Urr as far as I can see tsolkas is attempting to disprove general relativity using newtonian mechanics. Which is crazy as all he could possibly do was proove that newtonian mechanics was flawed.

 I haven't gone through it in detail as I have more important things to do, but as far as I can tell the end of his Proof section actually shows what he is trying to disprove - that the ratio of two gravitational masses is the same as their ratio of inertial masses... the equivalence principle!!!

This is all well and good, as the whole of newtonian mechanics assumes the equivalence principle is correct. It may not be, but you are going to have to show this to be the case using experiments, not newtonian mechanics.