0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Ok, I now understand what you are saying.From a probability point of view all the games are equal. I would view the 100 decks as following probability rules when they were dealt and equal to the individual shuffled deck. Over a large number of games they are equal. Probability deals with what is most likely to happen under various circumstances and degree of knowledge.Your theory involves predetermination, which is not part of probability. You are dealing with individual events.If you want to develop a maths for your theory you have to stop using probability terms as it will only confuse people.I don't know how you can handle this with maths. Will have a think, but not hopeful.
ColinI think I am trying to describe this - SL(n, Z) → SL(n, Z/N·Z)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congruence_subgroup
86400/86400=152/86400=0.0006018518551/86400=0.0005902777750/86400=0.00057870371/86400=0.00001157407this seems connected somehow?added - 52*2/86400=0.001203703752*100/86400=0.0601851851852*1661.53846154/86400=1
Can you explain why you think that and how you link the variables to your problem?because of what this says,In mathematics, the special linear group of degree n over a field F is the set of n × n matrices with determinant 1, with the group operations of ordinary matrix multiplication and matrix inversion. This is the normal subgroup of the general linear group given by the kernel of the determinant I don't know why you are dividing 52, 51, 50 etc. we agreed that you are not looking at probability but at what is 'written' so you need actual values as what is written is no longer random but fixed. Also your problem has more to do with orientation of the decks that individual cards.I have to repeat however that for me what is written is irrelevant, it is how it was written that is important and that is what defines the distribution of the cards over a large number of games. Thus until we know the outcome, the rules of probability apply and P(X)=P(Y).And yes, in your view of the game P(X) cannot =P(Y) because the card values are a single, specific outcome.
presently looking at this.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_periodic_function
because of what this says,In mathematics, the special linear group of degree n over a field F is the set of n × n matrices with determinant 1, with the group operations of ordinary matrix multiplication and matrix inversion. This is the normal subgroup of the general linear group given by the kernel of the determinant ...presently looking at this.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_periodic_function
Anything of block randomness is predictable to a degree, I can accurately predict that if you continued to spin a roulette wheel and spin the ball, turn after turn for 24 hrs, I will predict that zero will always make an appearance within 24hrs.
Quote from: Thebox on 07/09/2015 19:17:56because of what this says,In mathematics, the special linear group of degree n over a field F is the set of n × n matrices with determinant 1, with the group operations of ordinary matrix multiplication and matrix inversion. This is the normal subgroup of the general linear group given by the kernel of the determinant ...presently looking at this.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_periodic_functionThese are moving you further from understanding your problem.You need to concentrate on understanding why P(X)=P(Y). Then you will have your answer.Let us know when you have done that.
In algebra would this be correct A+B=AB?
This equation is satisfied in the case of A =2 and B = 2. Also A = 0 and B = 0. In General: for any value A, there is a value B = A/(A–1) which will satisfy your equation.
you asked if A+B=AB makes sense algebraically. I understand that statement to mean: "there are two numbers, A and B, for which A plus B equals A times B."This is a perfectly valid algebraic statement, and can be rearranged to show that every number A has exactly one value of B such that A plus B equals A times B. We can even solve for what B must be for any A, which was I meant to show as B = A/(A–1), which you should understand to mean: "B must equal the ratio of A and A minus one."
so if I put x+y=xythat would mean the same as a+b?
I have been playing around with something, and wish for an opinion, X^100=XY=10cm²XY^100=XYZ=10cm³E=XYZ-^XYZ=0cm³would this make any sense to you?
Quote from: Thebox on 08/09/2015 21:45:02so if I put x+y=xythat would mean the same as a+b?x+y=xy is the same as A+B=AB, which is the same as g+q=gq (unless you have defined the letters or added other relationships to them--for instance, if your equation is also accompanied with x+y=6, then it is assumed that the x in one equation is the same as the x in the other, and then numerical values can be found for both x and y)Quote from: Thebox on 08/09/2015 21:45:02I have been playing around with something, and wish for an opinion, X^100=XY=10cm²XY^100=XYZ=10cm³E=XYZ-^XYZ=0cm³would this make any sense to you?I don't think it makes much sense. I don't know how you're using the ^ symbol. It is also odd to put units (cm) on one side of an equation, but not the other...
^ to the power of and if you notice I was subtracted the power of contracting XYZ.Time begun XYZ-^XYZ=0
Quote from: Thebox on 09/09/2015 07:13:48^ to the power of and if you notice I was subtracted the power of contracting XYZ.Time begun XYZ-^XYZ=0You can't raise a - sign to a powerAlso, how can you say 'time begun' = 0cm3When you write things like this it looks as though you are just pulling our legs (polite version) or trolling.If that is not the case you really do need to concentrate on learning basic maths, it would make your life, and ours, less frustrating.
I am not raising , I am tasking the power of away. I am contracting space, or expanding it, try it , it works for me.
You can correctly state it as XYZ^-XYZ or . So that if XYZ = 10 then XYZ^XYZ then equals 10000000000. This then is 1/10000000000
Is JefferyH's answer what you are trying to do?Also, you still havent explained how can you say 'time begun' = 0cm3
Because time is a measurement based on another measurement, i.e 24 hrs = 0.0288m/s