The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
General Discussion & Feedback
Just Chat!
Can inanimate objects carry expressive meaning?
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Can inanimate objects carry expressive meaning?
5 Replies
4552 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
coberst
(OP)
Sr. Member
292
Activity:
0%
Can inanimate objects carry expressive meaning?
«
on:
29/06/2009 10:41:33 »
Can inanimate objects carry expressive meaning?
“Expression resides in perceptual qualities of the stimulus pattern”—Rudolf Arnheim
In achieving great quantifying skills we have seriously damaged our ability to focus upon the qualities of our surroundings and the effects of those qualities upon our worldview. With a little thought we can readily recognize that “we do not do justice to what we see by describing it only with measurements of size, shape, wavelength, or speed. The dynamic qualities of shapes and events have proved to be an inseparable aspect of all visual experience.”
When we consciously open our eyes to the dynamic qualities conveyed by any object we will inevitably see these objects as carrying expressive meaning. “All perceptual qualities have generality. We see redness, smallness, remoteness, swiftness, embodied in individual examples, but conveying a
kind
of experience, rather than a uniquely particular one…The dynamic differences between Romanesque and Gothic architecture translate themselves automatically into states of mind characterizing the corresponding cultural periods.”
Arnheim defines “
expression as modes of organic or inorganic behavior displayed in the dynamic appearance of perceptual objects or events.
In a narrow sense
expression
is said to exist only in confluence with mind wherein facial muscles give rise to structures that relate to what is going on in mind. In this narrow view non animate materials have expression only in a figurative sense.
Theodore Lipps’ “theory of empathy” was developed to explain how we find expression emanating from our vision of inanimate objects. When I see the columns of a temple I feel the physical forces sustained by that column because of my past experience. I project my stress feeling onto the columns. I have the capacity to project such things as “my pride, my courage, my stubbornness, my lightness, my playful assuredness, my tranquil compliance. Only thus my empathy with regard to nature becomes truly aesthetic empathy…expression resides in perceptual qualities of the stimulus pattern
“One aspect of the wisdom that belongs to a genuine culture is the constant awareness of the symbolic meaning expressed in a concrete happening, the sensing of the universal in the particular…There are people who cannot swallow because there is something in their lives they “cannot swallow” or whom an unconscious sense of guilt compels to spend hours every day on washing and cleaning.”
All perceptual, as well as expression, qualities have generality. This is why it is correct to say such things as Picasso’s picture can symbolizes gentleness or that Michelangelo’s
Creation of Man
, on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel, is generally understood to be a symbol of Genesis.
Quotes from
Art and Visual Perception: Psychology of the Creative Eye
by Rudolf Arnheim
Logged
Don_1
Naked Science Forum King!
6889
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 15 times
A stupid comment for every occasion.
Can inanimate objects carry expressive meaning?
«
Reply #1 on:
29/06/2009 18:03:17 »
Would you care to ask Rudolf Arnheim if he would like to post on the forum?
If he would, that's fine by me, otherwise,
YOU
make your own post for a change.......
No, on second thoughts, maybe that wouldn't be such a good idea!
Logged
If brains were made of dynamite, I wouldn't have enough to blow my nose.
Bored chemist
Naked Science Forum GOD!
30351
Activity:
13%
Thanked: 1217 times
Can inanimate objects carry expressive meaning?
«
Reply #2 on:
29/06/2009 19:33:20 »
Q "Can inanimate objects carry expressive meaning?"
A yes. I assure you that smacking someone with an inanimate object such as a cricket bat can carry meaning. Not, perhaps with the subtlety of language, but meaning nevertheless.
So that's that question answered.
Next.
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
Don_1
Naked Science Forum King!
6889
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 15 times
A stupid comment for every occasion.
Can inanimate objects carry expressive meaning?
«
Reply #3 on:
30/06/2009 09:08:51 »
Logged
If brains were made of dynamite, I wouldn't have enough to blow my nose.
Bored chemist
Naked Science Forum GOD!
30351
Activity:
13%
Thanked: 1217 times
Can inanimate objects carry expressive meaning?
«
Reply #4 on:
30/06/2009 19:02:21 »
This computer is an inanimate object. I seem to have communicated and expressive meaning to Don_1
Logged
Please disregard all previous signatures.
Madidus_Scientia
Naked Science Forum King!
1451
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 1 times
Can inanimate objects carry expressive meaning?
«
Reply #5 on:
30/06/2009 20:28:50 »
Can coberst receive expressed meaning from others?
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...