0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Einstein never said anything about beds, large and small balls. And nobody has ever said that there are holes in spacetime. If you got that from the term Black Hole then that term was coined using terms which are to be understood only by analogy. I.e. if an kind of object moves towards the event horizon then it will eventually disappear from the universe, i.e. there will be no way at all to detect it's existence. The object will never even cross the event horizon because it slows down and comes to a stop before it gets there. Therefore the event horizon of the black hole behaves like a hole in space, but it's not physical hole.The change in mass of your weight is due to experimental error and not due to an actual increase in mass. The attraction of objects by the earth is independent of the magnetic field of the gravitating bodies and of the objects which are in free-fall in them. I.e. in flat spacetime an object which as a super strong magnetic field will fall at the same rate as an object with the same proper mass but which carries no magnetic field. In a curved spacetime it's a bit different since the field couples to the spacetime curvature. However the effect is so small that it can't be measure with instruments that we have today.You have ignored the fact that all objects fall at the same rate regardless of their mass or magnetic field. In fact, as explained above, objectd with no magnetic field at all will fall at the same rate as one with a strong magnetic field. For example: Venus doesn't have a magnetic field yet it orbits the sun as describe by Newton's and Einstein's theory, the later being more accurate.
This theory is really clever. The positive and negative things in atoms attract each other, while the positives repel each other and the negatives repel each other, so we can have the forces that attract causing gravity while the ones that repel cause the dark energy that accelerates the expansion of the universe.
An atom has positive and negative, so one atom attracts and repels.
The attraction of my theory is general, the energy is which attracts.
For example, if you give energy to a fan, it will turn on, and if you turn it off, will not turn.
Everything has energy and the that not has energy, will not attract.
But if we give energy to the mass, become magnet.
By the way, each color emits its wave.
According to my experiment, …
…the planet Earth has a magnetic field and the planet Earth not has gravity neither spacetime.
I will perform experiments with water.
My conclusion is: planet Earth attracts by magnetism.Why placing a magnet on iron, iron acquire more weight?
Science is the systematic enterprise of gathering knowledge about the world and organizing and condensing that knowledge into testable laws and theories.The success and credibility of science is anchored in the willingness of scientists to:1) expose their ideas and results to independent testing and replication by other scientists: this requires the complete and open exchange of data, procedures and materials2) abandon or modify accepted conclusions when confronted with more complete or reliable experimental evidence.Adherence to these principles provides a mechanism for self-correction that is the foundation of the credibility of science.
Quote from: VictorEliasEspinozaGuedez on 24/10/2014 22:07:53My conclusion is: planet Earth attracts by magnetism.Why placing a magnet on iron, iron acquire more weight?Your conclusion is absolutely wrong. Worse than that you've ignored everything I've said to you demonstrating otherwise. That kind of behavior goes against the very foundations of what science is. I.e. fromWhat is Science by Panel on Public Affairs of the American Physical Society, Am. J. Phys., 67(, Aug. (1999)http://link.aip.org/link/ajpias/v67/i8/p659/s1I uploaded it onto my personal website athttp://home.comcast.net/~peter.m.brown/ef/what_is_science.pdfQuoteScience is the systematic enterprise of gathering knowledge about the world and organizing and condensing that knowledge into testable laws and theories.The success and credibility of science is anchored in the willingness of scientists to:1) expose their ideas and results to independent testing and replication by other scientists: this requires the complete and open exchange of data, procedures and materials2) abandon or modify accepted conclusions when confronted with more complete or reliable experimental evidence.Adherence to these principles provides a mechanism for self-correction that is the foundation of the credibility of science.Everything you've said so far is contrary to what science is.