0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
This whole random argument is annoying to argue against because you can explain anything using a random argument. You could say gravity doesnt exist, objects have just randomnly decided to fall. I've pointed out that there is a correlation between mass, and rotation.
Considering my princple, planets rotation should be generally determined by their mass/density. So is that somewhat consistent with modern observation? Well lets consider our solar system, the largest planet, jupiter, rotates the fastest, while mercury the smallest, rotates the slowest. Also if you order all the planets in terms of mass 1-8, and then you ordered all the planets in terms of rotational speed, you would find that those two things correlate exactly.
Are you suggesting that it is electric charge that attracts massive objects together?Can you really disagree with the idea that the force of Gravity accounts for planetary, stellar and galactic motion? Gravity has only 'positives' when it comes to attraction forces - there are no negatives - unless you have different evidence.Gravity is positive when we exist in linear space-time and space pushes objects together. Once we enter areas of non-linear space time gravity can turn negative or zero. Thus once space has no ability to push objects together, gravity is non-existant. At the big bang, most everything was inside the small volume. With nothing outside the small volume,. gravity was zero for a split second. After the bang, gravity became quite positive.
Quote from: sophiecentaur on 15/09/2008 17:52:21Are you suggesting that it is electric charge that attracts massive objects together?Can you really disagree with the idea that the force of Gravity accounts for planetary, stellar and galactic motion? Gravity has only 'positives' when it comes to attraction forces - there are no negatives - unless you have different evidence.Gravity is positive when we exist in linear space-time and space pushes objects together. Once we enter areas of non-linear space time gravity can turn negative or zero. Thus once space has no ability to push objects together, gravity is non-existant. At the big bang, most everything was inside the small volume. With nothing outside the small volume,. gravity was zero for a split second. After the bang, gravity became quite positive.
Are you suggesting that it is electric charge that attracts massive objects together?Can you really disagree with the idea that the force of Gravity accounts for planetary, stellar and galactic motion? Gravity has only 'positives' when it comes to attraction forces - there are no negatives - unless you have different evidence.
Everest disproves the theory that planets are generally round due to gravity. This is a large scale thing.
I dont think the extra amount of speed added by c.o.a.m really compares to the nullifying affect of the truly ridiculously large amount of atoms you could find in an entire planet!