0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Can you give an example of a physical equation where the speed of time plays a role?
But it hardly matters , I think my explanation is 100% axiom fact and is unarguable and undeniable.
Quote from: Thebox on 02/09/2016 14:16:32But it hardly matters , I think my explanation is 100% axiom fact and is unarguable and undeniable. That's a shame. I have a really cool thought experiment that disproves this. And I was gonna share it, but I guess you're not interested in learning. Tell me again, why are you here?
Quote from: PhysBang on 02/09/2016 14:11:28Can you give an example of a physical equation where the speed of time plays a role?Probably most of the equations where time is involved, i.e d/t time dilation, but I can't write that using my keyboard. the speed of light etc etcBut it hardly matters , I think my explanation is 100% axiom fact and is unarguable and undeniable. What this affects I will leave you to decide, I know I am correct.
Time=Motion=fundamental energy of c. The time of motion only has the ability of distance of motion relative to c. Infinite time would = infinite c which we do not observe.
Quote from: Thebox on 02/09/2016 14:16:32Quote from: PhysBang on 02/09/2016 14:11:28Can you give an example of a physical equation where the speed of time plays a role?Probably most of the equations where time is involved, i.e d/t time dilation, but I can't write that using my keyboard. the speed of light etc etcBut it hardly matters , I think my explanation is 100% axiom fact and is unarguable and undeniable. What this affects I will leave you to decide, I know I am correct.None of your examples seem to be ones where the rate of time is used, rather, they are ones where a rate is given, i.e., a comparison of a quantity to time. Given the definition of "rate", your claim seems to be nonsense, not true.
Well it does not matter if I give no examples, my one explanation is surely an over ruling law that is 100% accurately true. Time can be measured at any rate .
Quote from: Thebox on 02/09/2016 16:48:09Well it does not matter if I give no examples, my one explanation is surely an over ruling law that is 100% accurately true. Time can be measured at any rate .If your explanation can't be used in physics, then it's not physics. The fact that you can't show an example is damning.
Posted by: Thebox« on: Today at 16:46:27 » "c is not time, there is no argument I could imagine you could give when considering any measurement greater than 0. Infinite time in no way presumes an infinite speed of light."What is your definition of time?
Motion causes time and everything is in motion. Existence and its cause are going to be debated for as long as conscious life exists. If everything were frozen in the universe existence of mass would remain but time would not.
You have a different definition and understanding of time than I do. How do you define time? Just is? Do you use terms without knowing their meaning often? How do you expect to explain things when you do not understand the words you are using to describe your thoughts?
Your bar for the truth is similar to presidential candidates Trump and Clinton.