0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Hey thanks JefferyH... for taking the trouble. This would appear to me "not" to be describing a theory of gravity but a theory of light. The title of "theory of gravity" and the axis describing magnitude of "escape velocity" is misleading. Light does not have to escape gravity in my model, it's massless.
In assuming that you are increasing these speeds of light by the same proportion that the equation that increases distances increases those distances, this graph would be useful in relation to my model if instead of the escape velocity you graphed the variable speeds of light against the distance the light has travelled at those speeds of light. It would be "really" useful if the graph could actually describe a relationship between 2 exact same bodies of mass - whereas the speed of light starts at 30000000 and ends at 300000000, and is reducing in the distance in-between the bodies of mass with the slowest point located at midpoint, and that these varying speeds should be corresponded by the distance travelled by the light at that speed.
By adding up these distances travelled, this would constitute my models "actual distance" between these bodies of mass.It would then be relevant to travel the light for the same amount of "time" it took the variable speeds of light to get from one body of mass to the other, (the length of a moment is expanded by the same proportion/ratio that the speed of light was reduced) while travelling the light for this "amount" of slower time "transposed" for the calculation back into the time that these slower times would take in relation to the length of an earth moment, and travelling the light at the 300000000 speed of light. Then by adding up this distance travelled, this is the "distance in time".By subtracting the "actual distance" from "the distance in time" you will have a numerical figure of distance on by how much "slow time" has expanded space between these bodies of mass.That would be "timey's" time theory of light and distance.
No one else appears interested any more so take this opportunity to bounce ideas off me because I don't mind.
The first thing you need to straighten out is exactly what you mean by light slowing down. With respect to what? It cannot be local observers otherwise you are violating the laws of physics.
Time is not caused by anything. Time measures the rate of change of the state of a system. The question you should be asking is what causes the change in the state of a system? This is the result of the various forces and governed by conservation laws. Your obsession with time is the problem. You could benefit from thinking about the role of dark energy on the spacetime metric. You could actually modify your theory in order to apply it to dark energy because that is what it models.
One last pointer. You need to determine a way to reconcile why should result in an expanding universe.
Quote from: jeffreyH on 02/08/2015 01:50:20One last pointer. You need to determine a way to reconcile why should result in an expanding universe.Please can I gently remind you that as a non mathematician I need a whiteboard explanation of your maths that includes a precursor of their objective and a walk through in words of their process if I am to understand what you are expressing.