0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
"the question, if absolute zero Kelvin is attained, heat energy cannot not exist, but WILL COLD exist?"Since the laws of physics prevent absolute zero being stained the question has no meaning.Cold clearly exists (that's why I just put the heating on), but only as a relative term.
OK, so why did I put the heating on?Cold clearly does exist- it's the relative absence of heat.
Quote from: Bored chemist on 01/04/2010 22:03:46OK, so why did I put the heating on?Cold clearly does exist- it's the relative absence of heat.Okdoky.So is "cold" negative thermal energy?
Quote from: Geezer on 01/04/2010 22:23:00Quote from: Bored chemist on 01/04/2010 22:03:46OK, so why did I put the heating on?Cold clearly does exist- it's the relative absence of heat.Okdoky.So is "cold" negative thermal energy?"it's the relative absence of heat."
Quote from: Bored chemist on 02/04/2010 11:18:06Quote from: Geezer on 01/04/2010 22:23:00Quote from: Bored chemist on 01/04/2010 22:03:46OK, so why did I put the heating on?Cold clearly does exist- it's the relative absence of heat.Okdoky.So is "cold" negative thermal energy?"it's the relative absence of heat."Certainly a new one on me. A reference perhaps?
It is amazing that the scientific world does not recognize that cold exists. Perhaps the super-heat Big Bang theory has substantially something to do with it, that everything started from heat which is incorrect. Spacetime came into being before Big Bang.. I believe we should recognize that cold exists by itself.
"Nouncold (plural colds)A condition of low temperature."fromhttp://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cold