The Naked Scientists
Toggle navigation
Login
Register
Podcasts
The Naked Scientists
eLife
Naked Genetics
Naked Astronomy
In short
Naked Neuroscience
Ask! The Naked Scientists
Question of the Week
Archive
Video
SUBSCRIBE to our Podcasts
Articles
Science News
Features
Interviews
Answers to Science Questions
Get Naked
Donate
Do an Experiment
Science Forum
Ask a Question
About
Meet the team
Our Sponsors
Site Map
Contact us
User menu
Login
Register
Search
Home
Help
Search
Tags
Member Map
Recent Topics
Login
Register
Naked Science Forum
General Discussion & Feedback
Just Chat!
Rubber-Johnny 2.0
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
Rubber-Johnny 2.0
3 Replies
2894 Views
0 Tags
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
RD
(OP)
Naked Science Forum GOD!
9094
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 163 times
Rubber-Johnny 2.0
«
on:
26/03/2013 10:33:59 »
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/03/26/bill_gates_wants_better_condoms/
Logged
Don_1
Naked Science Forum King!
6889
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 15 times
A stupid comment for every occasion.
Re: Rubber-Johnny 2.0
«
Reply #1 on:
26/03/2013 16:04:37 »
I had to read this bit again:
Quote
“have a testable hypothesis,
I thought I read 'testatable' first time around.
Should have gone to Specsavers! Ooer, I did! Or at least, I think I did. Not sure why I came out with a pound of sausages though???
The problem here is that its not just birth control which is required, it is more a case of preventing STDs, and for that you need an effective and reliable barrier. How about a brick wall?
The ol' rubber-Johnny needs to be a tight fit if it is to stay in place during
a damn good bonk
intercourse. Skin to skin contact must be avoided, so the only thing I can think of is loose fitting pair of rubber pants with a Tommy Dangler appendige pipe.
Sorry, I'm not going any further, I just know if I do, this post will end up in the gutter.
Logged
If brains were made of dynamite, I wouldn't have enough to blow my nose.
RD
(OP)
Naked Science Forum GOD!
9094
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 163 times
Re: Rubber-Johnny 2.0
«
Reply #2 on:
26/03/2013 18:24:30 »
How about a vending machine with a
3D printer
which manufacturers a bespoke Johnny. [
]
You'd have to stick more than a couple of quid in it though to provide it with the measurements.
Logged
Don_1
Naked Science Forum King!
6889
Activity:
0%
Thanked: 15 times
A stupid comment for every occasion.
Re: Rubber-Johnny 2.0
«
Reply #3 on:
27/03/2013 10:18:05 »
GOOD GRIEF!!!!
I say, old chap, don't you think it bad enough that some blokes already seem to have great trouble keeping it in their pants without inviting them to whip it out and stick it in a measuring device? They'll be queueing up outside the chemist (drug store).
I can see it now; "
Mine's bigger than your-orrs, ner-ner nah ner-ner
". "
Step aside 'tiny', let a real man in. Better make sure the latex bottle is full for
my
John Thomas
".
But wait! Actually, you could be on to something here, RD. If the measuring machine were made to look and react like a woman, perhaps they could negate the desire for a real woman. Self de-contaminating sex androids with computer generated vocals. Yes, I can see it now........ "
H-e-l-l-o b-i-g b-o-y. D-o y-o-u w-a-n-t s-o-m-e f-u-n?
I think I'd better go lay down in a darkened room. I just knew this was destined for the gutter.
Logged
If brains were made of dynamite, I wouldn't have enough to blow my nose.
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
Tags:
There was an error while thanking
Thanking...