Naked Science Forum
Non Life Sciences => Physics, Astronomy & Cosmology => Topic started by: diegostation on 10/05/2005 00:54:56
-
I've heard that it doesn't matter if you have an initial velocity or not when turning on a flashlight, the speed of the light is always 300,000 km per second, how can this be?
-
The answer is 'special relativity'.
Take an experiment where a pulse of light travels from A to B. There are two events here: the light leaves A, and the light arrives at B. To find the speed of the light you divide the distance from A to B by the time difference between the light leaving and arriving.
If someone else who is moving in the same direction as the light observes the experiment they will disagree about how far the light has traveled (because they are moving relative to A & B, so they see A & B moving relative to them, so in the time between the events B will have moved towards where A was when the light departed).
Different observers moving at different speeds can still agree about the result of the experiment (the speed of light) even though they disagree about the distance the light has traveled. This is because they also disagree about the time it took. Our friend moving in the direction of the light will have experienced less time pass during the experiment.
This isn't much of an explanation and even so i have fudged some details, but it should give you an idea of the shift in priorities. In the Newtonian view space (distance) and time are agreed on by all observers while all speeds are relative, but in relativity the speed of light is agreed on by all, while space and time become relative to the observer to fit this.
I will try to explain some of the evidence for this if i get time later, unless someone would like to beat me to it.
-
well Einstein is fake speed of light is not constant nothing which has particle nature can travel with a constant speed in this universe in the presence of gravity its just the lake of observation due to its very high speed
-
Sorry Q, its been measured many times in a gravitational field, and there is a red shift of wavelength, but fixed speed.
-
What in the known universe is not moving? From only that point could there be a constant speed of light whereby all other light would base it's speed from. In my opinion, to consider the speed of light from all emitting light bodies in motion as a constant, is equivilant to saying to earth is flat. Consider our milkyway one of a hundred billion galaxies in the universe. The light emitted from our gallaxy travels to the next neighboring galaxy , say Andromida, at 186,282mps. If that galaxy is approching us at a rate of 360,000mph (hour), then the light would be recieved by (them) at a doppler shifted 6,000mpm (minute) or 100mps (second).
Lets consider a black hole. We all understand that light emitted from the black hole can not escape the gravitational forces of the massive star. Like a baseball tossed in the air, the light arcs and returns to the star. On the flip side, external light that is captured by the black hole would accelerate as it approched the black hole. If we believed it were a constant, then we'd have to believe that light can be affected by gravity to slow down but external light is unaffected by gravity and continues toward the black hole at it's "speed limit" 186,282mps. To me, that's like saying the earth is round, but you'll fall of the edge if you go to far.
Lastly, I would like to argue the concept of speed. Distance per unit of time. Time is a man made concept. The universe only knows motion.
A hundred years ago, a vast majority of the worlds population road horses. In recent history, we've graduated from thinking the earth to be flat. We've gradutated from the idea that the sun rotated around the earth. When will we come to understand that the universe does not adjust it's "speed limit" to our medium sized galaxy, the milkyway.
-
the universe adjusts its speed limit to light...
-
Universal speed cameras? [:D]
-
I don't understand what satalink means...
Light doesn't get pulled in by the black hole's gravity as photons have no mass - light follows the path of space and it is the space which is getting warped and distorted by the black hole's gravity leading to the light falling into the black hole... Therefore there's no need for it to accelerate in the first place, meaning that the speed of light is constant?
"I have great faith in fools; self-confidence my friends call it."
-Edgar Allan Poe
-
qpan
Thats how i understood it to be.
Because there is no gravitational force acting directly on the photon, the force of gravity is instead acting on the space or path the photon has no choice but to follow.
There has got to be a difference between the two.
And also i thought as far as the photon is concerned it is still travelling in a perfectly straight line and so in the photons frame of reference it should be totally unaffected.
so in my mind the photon is unaffected by gravity its the space that the photons are moving through that is affected
can anybody clear this up
-
I think you've got it clearly already. The photon is freely falling, so it feels no gravitational force. The gravitational field acts on the space to curve it. The photon follows the spacial curvature, and moves in a geodesic.
-
Everything is fiction in regards to this topic...
Sept = 7;
Oct = 8;
Nov = 9;
Dec = 10;
-
the speed of light is a constant, this is a postulate of relativity and it doesn't require proof.
-
Last I checked, the "Theory of Relativity" was still a "Theory".
Sept = 7;
Oct = 8;
Nov = 9;
Dec = 10;
-
ive got a theory and my theory is that sooner or later
i will see your name in a reply to a future post
lets see if my theory is proved right
you always get one.
ps. you could always prove me wrong if you like
-
quote:
Originally posted by qazibasit
well Einstein is fake speed of light is not constant nothing which has particle nature can travel with a constant speed in this universe in the presence of gravity its just the lake of observation due to its very high speed
-
Let us keep in mind that we have yet to discover the nature of all exhisting mass in the known universe.We are the fleas,trying to size up the dog,not to mention the elephant////I would guess that an anti-matter object would be subject to anti-mass environment to an equal degree...
-
E=MC times pie or pie inverted
Just a thought.
-
I see where you're going with that. I've always had a problem with E=MC(squared) in that it does not account for area volume. Light is indeed emitted in 3D. So I would agree more with an equation that looked something like E=MC(Pie.R squared). Exception being that I don't think that the speed of light is a constant. So the C fails for me.
I've also toyed with the inversed equation (Big Bang?). M = sq.rt(E/C)
Sept = 7;
Oct = 8;
Nov = 9;
Dec = 10;
-
The inverse of E= mc^2 is M= E/c^2, and this is the form that Einstein wrote it in his 1905 paper. (except that he used L for energy).
Pablo Gonzalez
-
cool! What exactly does E=MC^2 mean? I know it is like Mass times the speed of light squared makes mass. but how does this work?
----------------------
-__- my website!!!!
http://www.simeonie.co.uk
has forums too!
Think about it! lolz
-
Energy = Mass * Velocity Squared is a newtonian concept. Einstein extrapolated that to Energy = Mass * the speed of light squared to say that 1) the speed of light was the maximum velocity, and that at that point the mass would turn into pure energy. It is an interesting thought, that he then poured a lot of thought into. It seems to work better than Newtonian physics so we use it for now. But do not dispare, there is always room for improvement.
And no, the speed of light is not constant. The speed of light appears to be constant in a vacuum (which is also mostly present in the low gravity form of space). Does gravity bend light as seen in the Einsteinium effect of distant stars? And why does light travel slower in air, water or oil? what is interacting with the photon to slow it down? Is it really the same photon that emerges or a photon that is regenerated from elastic reactions. But if so, why is the scattering angle so low. You know, there is a lot that we just don't know.
David
-
If you want to learn more about the meaning of E=mc^2, check this out http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/
Pablo Gonzalez
-
Hey Simeonie, if u want to know how this formula perform, u could find in some nucleusphysical book. But i mean it is so hard to reach an exact explanation for it. the reason maybe our energy at maximum level < 100Tev ( as i know)
-
1) Now, I'm not sure, if I'm correct or totaly crazy, David, but I got that idea, that actually, when light passes somethink, other than vacuum, it is absorbed, and almost at the same time, it is emmited, sometimes with different wavelength, sometimes with the same. But between those delays, the light would have the same speed. I'm not sure, if what I mean is clear.
2) I simply cannot agree with explanation of moth because, diegostation asked about when the source of the light is moving, and not when observer is moving next to the light.
3)"Lastly, I would like to argue the concept of speed. Distance per unit of time. Time is a man made concept. The universe only knows motion..
Quote from Satalink, about which I have somethink to say.
Time is not man made. It was here before we came. All that men did, was to start measuring the time and give certain period of time a name.
But if you say, that time is man made, it is the same, as saying, that all the three dimensions are man made, because we gave them a name (length, width, and depth), and we also found some way to measure it. But we certainly didnt make them, that would probably mean, that men did the "Big Beng", or however the universe started.
-
David sparkman ask "why does light travel more slowly in a dielectric medium", the answer is that it does not!
What happens is that the photons are absorbed and then re emitted by the atoms of the intervening medium each time this happens there is a small delay but between atoms the photons travel at their normal speed
syhprum
-
David sparkman ask "why does light travel more slowly in a dielectric medium", the answer is that it does not!
What happens is that the photons are absorbed and then re emitted by the atoms of the intervening medium each time this happens there is a small delay but between atoms the photons travel at their normal speed
syhprum
-
It is understood that the apparent slowing down of light in a dielectric medium is due to the absorption and remission of photons by the intervening atoms, could something similar be happening when light moves through 'empty' space where the photons move at infinite speed between the the spontaneously occurring particle/anti particle pairs that quantum theory postulates but interacts with them?
syhprum
-
It's an interesting idea. Infact, I had thought about it too.
In the Casimir effect http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect two plane metal plates very close together produce an "higher quantum void" in the space between, because not all the virtual photons can "fit" inside, so there is a net force pushing the two plates together, due to virtual photons radiation pressure, higher outside the plates than inside of them.
Maybe the electric properties inside this "higher quantum void", specifically the dielectric permittivity epsilon(0), are different, so that even the speed of light is different? If epsilon(0) were lower, c would be higher!
-
In the twenties and thirties when electronics were less sophisticated 'Lecher lines' see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lecher_lines
Were used to measure the frequency/wavelength of radio frequency generators.
Perhaps this technique could be used with a Casimir system as an experiment.
Sounds so simple someone must of done it already!
syhprum
-
quote:
Originally posted by darksat
E=MC times pie or pie inverted
Just a thought.
-
you can say all this mind bogglin stuff......
but how can u actually physically measure the speed of light??? you can't.... its all just made up numbers haha
-
There isn't the need to measure light's speed anylonger, now c = 299,792,458 m/s by definition.
-
E=MC^2 this formula gives the energy 'tied' up in mass, a joule=1Nm, c=3*10^8 m/s (approx) so the energy in 1kg of mass = 1 x 3*10^8 m/s^2 so thats 9*10^16 joules, thats a lot of energy in a bag of sugar! or enougth energy to accelerate 1 kg of mass to the speed of light in one second in Classical Newtonian Mechanics ((F=MA) and a vacuum), Now this you need to ponder!!
I could not join any group that would have me as a member!
-
Hey, it's pretty simple to measure the speed of light. Very simple, in fact, as long as you assume light bounces instantly off a mirror. Set a mirror into regular rotation with a known frequency. (You can use an elctric drill and an electronic tuner to set the speed). Bounce a laser from the rotating mirror to a stationary mirror, back to the rotating mirror and you can measure the deflection of the beam. Knowing the frequency gives you the time of travel and using the measured distances, you can easily calculate the speed. If you are careful enough, you can get 3.0*10^8 m/s to +/- 5% or so.
The speed of light was calculated from maxwell's equations to be the inverse of square root mu times epsilon (permiability and permitivity). This has been measure many times since the late 1800's.