0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
BEYOND SCIENCE AND SENSES.....THE GODGod………is………………complex intelligent energy ...
Every form of energy we have discussed is known only as a function of other variables, and I have been careful to say internal energy function, potential energy function, etc. Functions are pencil-and-paper constructs. I can't show you a function that has any substance, and that is why I can't show you a chunk of energy or why I can't define it or yell you what it is. It is just a mathematical or abstract or just a group of numbers. Thus we have no energy meters, not device we stick into a system which will record its energy. The whole thing is man-made.
all work is done by energy and through energy as everything is energy.
Quote from: pandey_23ajayall work is done by energy and through energy as everything is energy.This is a circular argument since energy is the result of work. Work is not done by energy, its done by a force. That which is using the force is also said to be expending energy in order to do the work. If this was not true then there would be a violation in the principle of the constancy of energy.
BEYOND SCIENCE AND SENSES.....THE GOD
when i say GOD IS COMPLEX ENERGY, i can not define that complex or i do not have knowledge of that complex, that is why i used COMPLEX ENERGY , perhaps our science may never be able to do that..BUT....I HOPE..IT DOESSO I AM NOT MISUSING THE TERM ENERGY...
Issue with many is that, they do not understand energy, ...
however they them self do not understand thermodynamics.
present science does not defines energy properly.
we still need to understand energy.so please do not misuse Thermodynamics,
[ please do not confine yourself to few laws of science.
the COMPLEX ENERGY (GOD) IS ABOVE ALL YOUR LAWS...
But energy is defined as ...
Quote from: Ethos_But energy is defined as ...You know that energy really can't be defined, right?
Quote from: PmbPhy on 21/02/2015 20:35:56Quote from: Ethos_But energy is defined as ...You know that energy really can't be defined, right?Yes I do Pete, I tried to get as close as I know how just to explain to the OP that complex energy was a false assumption. I realize my definition lacks in so many areas, it was just as close as I could come.