0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
AS this is part of a project aiming at the "the unification of Quantum Theory and Relativity theories" and is out of the normal run of a Science Question and Answer Forum I am moving this to New Theories. This should not necessarily be taken as a criticism of the physics or rigor of the argument
Quote from: imatfaal on 04/04/2012 17:01:10AS this is part of a project aiming at the "the unification of Quantum Theory and Relativity theories" and is out of the normal run of a Science Question and Answer Forum I am moving this to New Theories. This should not necessarily be taken as a criticism of the physics or rigor of the argumentI was about to take it as an offense against the physics involved, but since you worded it so well, I cannot argue.
Present your views Wulf. It will be interesting reading you.
ÆthelwulfDoes time exist in the Universe, yes. Is that the whole picture, possibly not.
ÆthelwulfIf the prototype universe was born with equal quantities of matter and antimatter and the two different types of mass were gravitationally repulsive then the surviving particles could gravitationally sort themselves into two separate universes. Both going forward in time relative to themselves but going in opposite directions from the perspective of the other universe.
ÆthelwulfA positron can be thought of as an electron going backwards in time.
Quote from: MikeS on 05/04/2012 12:06:40ÆthelwulfA positron can be thought of as an electron going backwards in time.Only in Feynman diagrams. No scientist takes that seriously.
ÆthelwulfCould you quote references please?
Quote from: MikeS on 05/04/2012 12:29:18ÆthelwulfCould you quote references please?For creating a lump of antimatter... I will try and find it, sure. I think it was hydrogen, but don't qoute me just yet.
Quote from: Æthelwulf on 05/04/2012 12:14:38Quote from: MikeS on 05/04/2012 12:06:40ÆthelwulfA positron can be thought of as an electron going backwards in time.Only in Feynman diagrams. No scientist takes that seriously.I speculated four years ago antimatter may have antigravitational tendancies, and I based that on a principle of repulsion, that locally an electron and a positron repell each other such that it looks like antigravity, however, we have made a clump of antimatter recently and sad to say, I was wrong. There was no antigravitational tendacies.
Quote from: Æthelwulf on 05/04/2012 12:16:09Quote from: Æthelwulf on 05/04/2012 12:14:38Quote from: MikeS on 05/04/2012 12:06:40ÆthelwulfA positron can be thought of as an electron going backwards in time.Only in Feynman diagrams. No scientist takes that seriously.I speculated four years ago antimatter may have antigravitational tendancies, and I based that on a principle of repulsion, that locally an electron and a positron repell each other such that it looks like antigravity, however, we have made a clump of antimatter recently and sad to say, I was wrong. There was no antigravitational tendacies.Seriously?
ÆthelwulfThe article that you quoted only said that they had trapped a significant amount of hydrogen atoms. Not that they had weighed them.As far as I am aware the jury is still out.